Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
83
out of 100
VS
72
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 7-inch Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite) that was released on April 24, 2025, against the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold, which is powered by Google Tensor G5 and came out 4 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 91% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2962K versus 1553K)
- Higher display refresh rate – 165 Hz
- Supports higher wattage charging (68W versus 30W)
- Better grip in hands – the body is 76.41 mm narrower
- 24% higher pixel density (464 vs 374 PPI)
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- Weighs 59 grams less
- 29% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2936 and 2276 points
Reasons to consider the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
- The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
- Has a 1 inch larger screen size
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
- Has 33% more RAM: 16GB versus 12GB
- Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
- More recent OS version: Android 17 versus 15
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | POLED | OLED |
| Size | 7 inches | 8 inches |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2912 pixels | 2076 x 2152 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 22:9 | 1:1 |
| PPI | 464 ppi | 374 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | - | 3000 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 4500 nits | 1800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Ceramic | Ultra Thin Glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.3% | 88.5% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| RGB color space | 99.8% | - |
| PWM | 707 Hz | - |
| Response time | 2 ms | - |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | - |
Screen space comparison
Pixel 10 Pro Fold
8″ (1:1 ratio) = 32 in2
Razr 60 Ultra
7″ (22:9 ratio) = 17.2 in2
~86% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 171.48 mm (6.75 inches) | 155.2 mm (6.11 inches) |
| Width | 73.99 mm (2.91 inches) | 150.4 mm (5.92 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.19 mm (0.28 inches) | 5.2 mm (0.2 inches) |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 258 g (9.1 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP48 | IP68 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | - | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Green, Red | Gray, Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-button | Yes, in-button |
| Repairability | Good (3.42/5) | Good (3.43/5) |
| Drop resistance | Average (D) · 50 drops | Very good (B) · 210 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Google Tensor G5 |
| Max clock | 4320 MHz | 3780 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 5 + 2) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M) - 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L) |
- 2 cores at 2.25 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 5 cores at 3.05 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 1 core at 3.78 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 830 | PowerVR DXT-48-1536 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 1100 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3379.2 GFLOPS | ~1689.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 24419 | 4160 |
| Single-core score | 2936 | 2276 |
| Multi-core score | 8883 | 6173 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 873381 | 793606 |
| GPU | 1071286 | 103617 |
| Memory | 406568 | 269668 |
| UX | 610859 | 386118 |
| Total score | 2962094 | 1553009 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 69% | 93% |
| Graphics test | 17 FPS | 8 FPS |
| Graphics score | 2320 | 1012 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 41 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 47 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 41 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 34 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 10737 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 22854 | 17237 |
| Video editing | 8223 | 7203 |
| Photo editing | 34910 | 24584 |
| Data manipulation | 17923 | 14036 |
| Writing score | 27044 | 20213 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#119th place)
Recent User Tests
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-08-03 (Alex) | AnTuTu 11 | 2962094 |
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
No benchmark results yet
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 5300 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 16 (Can be upgraded to Android 17) |
| ROM | Hello UI | Stock Android |
| OS updates | 3 years | 7 years |
| Security updates | 4 years | 7 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 4700 mAh | 5015 mAh |
| Max charge power | 68 W | 30 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (30 W) | Yes (15 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes |
| Bypass charging | - | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (78% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:45 hr | 1:30 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1000 cycles | 1000 cycles |
| Web browsing | 12:47 hr | - |
| Watching video | 17:04 hr | - |
| Gaming | 05:53 hr | - |
| Standby | 110 hr | - |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#108th place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 48 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8000 x 6000 |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 5x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (1080p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 122° | 127° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 48 MP 2) Telephoto: 10.8 MP 3) Ultrawide: 10.5 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | - | Samsung GN8 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) | 1/1.96" (≈ 0.51 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | - | 10.8 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/3.0 |
| Focal length | - | 112 mm |
| Sensor | - | Samsung S5K3J1 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/2.65" (≈ 0.38 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 1.22 micron |
| Stabilization | - | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 10.5 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 12 mm | - |
| Sensor | - | Samsung S5K3J1 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/2.65" (≈ 0.38 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.6 micron | 1.22 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | - |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | - | 23 mm |
| Sensor | - | Samsung S5K3K1 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/3.94" (≈ 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | - | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | - | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | April 2025 | August 2025 |
| Release date | April 2025 | October 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1299 | $1799 |
| Sensors | - Hall-effect sensor - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 68 W | Not included |
Further details
Notes on Razr 60 Ultra:
- It is also known as the Motorola Razr Ultra in Europe.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 1