Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Razr 60
83
out of 100
VS
60
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 7-inch Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite) that was released on April 24, 2025, against the Motorola Razr 60, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 7400X. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 3.3x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2962K versus 886K)
- Shows 73% longer battery life (26:54 vs 15:31 hours)
- Higher display refresh rate – 165 Hz
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Delivers 25% higher peak brightness (1500 against 1199 nits)
- Supports higher wattage charging (68W versus 30W)
- Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- 12% higher pixel density (464 vs 413 PPI)
- 3.7x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2936 and 783 points
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 2.2
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | POLED | POLED |
| Size | 7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2912 pixels | 1080 x 2640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 22:9 | 22:9 |
| PPI | 464 ppi | 413 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | - | 1200 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 4500 nits | 3000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Ceramic | Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.3% | 85% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.8% | - |
| PWM | 707 Hz | - |
| Response time | 2 ms | - |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | - |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 171.48 mm (6.75 inches) | 171.3 mm (6.74 inches) |
| Width | 73.99 mm (2.91 inches) | 73.99 mm (2.91 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.19 mm (0.28 inches) | 7.25 mm (0.29 inches) |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP48 | IP48 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | - |
| Rear material | - | Eco-leather |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Green, Red | Gray, Blue, Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-button | Yes, in-button |
| Repairability | Good (3.42/5) | Good (3.63/5) |
| Drop resistance | Average (D) · 50 drops | Average (D) · 70 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 7400X |
| Max clock | 4320 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M) - 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L) |
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 4 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | Adreno 830 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 256 |
| GPU clock | 1100 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3379.2 GFLOPS | ~665.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 24419 | 3185 |
| Single-core score | 2936 | 783 |
| Multi-core score | 8883 | 2559 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 873381 | 343634 |
| GPU | 1071286 | 156189 |
| Memory | 406568 | 134537 |
| UX | 610859 | 252317 |
| Total score | 2962094 | 886677 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 69% | 98% |
| Graphics test | 17 FPS | 3 FPS |
| Graphics score | 2320 | 409 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 41 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 47 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 41 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 34 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 10737 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 22854 | 19413 |
| Video editing | 8223 | 8033 |
| Photo editing | 34910 | 32900 |
| Data manipulation | 17923 | 10903 |
| Writing score | 27044 | 19391 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#106th place)
Recent User Tests
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-08-03 (Alex) | AnTuTu | 2962094 |
Motorola Razr 60
No benchmark results yet
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 5300 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage size | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| ROM | Hello UI | Hello UI |
| OS updates | 3 years | 3 years |
| Security updates | 4 years | 4 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 4700 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Max charge power | 68 W | 30 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (30 W) | Yes (15 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes, (wireless) |
| Fast charging | Yes (78% in 30 min) | Yes (61% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:45 hr | 0:55 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1000 cycles | 1000 cycles |
| Web browsing | 12:47 hr | 07:02 hr |
| Watching video | 17:04 hr | 11:44 hr |
| Gaming | 05:53 hr | 04:09 hr |
| Standby | 110 hr | 55 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#107th place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (1080p) | - |
| Angle of widest lens | 122° | 120° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | - | Samsung ISOCELL GN8 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) | 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 12 mm | - |
| Sensor | - | Sony IMX258 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/3.0" (≈ 0.33 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.6 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 6528 x 4896 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | - | 25 mm |
| Sensor | - | OmniVision OV32B |
| Sensor size | - | 1/3.14" (≈ 0.32 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Autofocus | - | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | April 2025 | April 2025 |
| Release date | April 2025 | April 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1299 | $799 |
| Sensors | - Hall-effect sensor - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Hall-effect sensor - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 68 W | Not included |
Further details
Notes on Razr 60 Ultra:
- It is also known as the Motorola Razr Ultra in Europe.
Notes on Razr 60:
- There is a version with two physical SIM cards and no eSIM.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 8