Nothing Phone (3) vs Google Pixel 9
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.67-inch Nothing Phone (3) (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4) that was released on July 2, 2025, against the Google Pixel 9, which is powered by Google Tensor G4 and came out 11 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Nothing Phone (3)
- The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
- 52% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2371K versus 1561K)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
- Supports higher wattage charging (65W versus 27W)
- Has a 0.37 inch larger screen size
- Has 2 SIM card slots
- The phone is 11 months newer
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 3.1
- 24% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2117 and 1707 points
Reasons to consider the Google Pixel 9
- Delivers 49% higher peak brightness (2244 against 1508 nits)
- More recent OS version: Android 17 versus 16
- Weighs 20 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.67 inches | 6.3 inches |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels | 1080 x 2424 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 460 ppi | 422 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1600 nits | 2700 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 4500 nits | 1800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.5% | 87.1% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| RGB color space | 95.5% | 99% |
| PWM | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Response time | 4 ms | 1 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | ∞ Infinity |
Screen space comparison
Phone (3)
6.67″ (20:9 ratio) = 16.6 in2
Pixel 9
6.3″ (20:9 ratio) = 14.9 in2
~12% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 160.6 mm (6.32 inches) | 152.8 mm (6.02 inches) |
| Width | 75.59 mm (2.98 inches) | 72 mm (2.83 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.99 mm (0.35 inches) | 8.5 mm (0.33 inches) |
| Weight | 218 g (7.69 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP68 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | - |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black | White, Black, Green, Pink |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | Good (3.34/5) | Good (3.5/5) |
| Drop resistance | Good (C) · 90 drops | Excellent (A) · 270 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Google Tensor G4 |
| Max clock | 3210 MHz | 3100 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 2 cores at 2.02 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 4 cores at 1.92 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 3 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.1 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | - |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 825 | Mali-G715 MC7 |
| GPU shading units | 1024 | 896 |
| GPU clock | 1150 MHz | 940 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~2355.2 GFLOPS | ~1684.4 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 18674 | 7536 |
| Single-core score | 2117 | 1707 |
| Multi-core score | 6798 | 4431 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 707936 | 576617 |
| GPU | 802873 | 410060 |
| Memory | 376970 | 210177 |
| UX | 483914 | 364573 |
| Total score | 2371693 | 1561427 |
| Samples | [9 tests] | [4 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 61% | 74% |
| Graphics test | 13 FPS | 8 FPS |
| Graphics score | 1749 | 1047 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 30 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 34 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 31 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 25 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 7966 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 13254 | 10043 |
| Video editing | 6510 | 7463 |
| Photo editing | 27186 | 21077 |
| Data manipulation | 13887 | 13349 |
| Writing score | 19394 | 15810 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#179th place)
Recent User Tests
Nothing Phone (3)
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-23 (Val) | AnTuTu 12 | 2658288 |
| 📘 2026-07-15 (Leo) | AnTuTu 11 | 2371693 |
| 📘 2026-07-10 (Sumit Pandit) | AnTuTu 11 | 2392977 |
| 📘 2026-03-14 (Michael) | AnTuTu 11 | 2428616 |
| 📘 2026-02-01 (TheFunder) | AnTuTu 11 | 2270521 |
Google Pixel 9
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-18 -> Oleg 16 cm | AnTuTu 11 | 1423579 |
| 📘 2026-06-13 (Plotwa) | CPU Throttle | 82% |
| 📘 2026-04-14 (LymXT) | AnTuTu 11 | 1577137 |
| 📘 2025-12-09 (enigma) | AnTuTu 11 | 1519937 |
| 📘 2025-11-28 (W1TRAY) | AnTuTu 11 | 1561427 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 4800 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 17) |
| ROM | Nothing OS 4.0 | Stock Android |
| OS size | 26 GB | 19 GB |
| OS updates | 5 years | 7 years |
| Security updates | 7 years | 7 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 5150 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Max charge power | 65 W | 27 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Ion |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (15 W) | Yes (12 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (63% in 30 min) | Yes (55% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:00 hr | 1:25 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1400 cycles | 1000 cycles |
| Web browsing | 08:36 hr | 10:01 hr |
| Watching video | 13:19 hr | 13:38 hr |
| Gaming | 05:45 hr | 05:41 hr |
| Standby | 117 hr | 98 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8160 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (1080p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 114° | 123° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 48 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV50H | Samsung GNK |
| Sensor size | 1/1.3" (≈ 0.77 inch) | 1/1.31" (≈ 0.76 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.2 micron | 1.2 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | - |
| Aperture | f/2.7 | - |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.75" (≈ 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Optical | - |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.7 |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | - | 75 |
| Preview | - | 83 |
| Zoom | - | 132 |
| Samples | - | Photo samples of Google Pixel 9 from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 10.5 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | - | 20 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/3.1" (≈ 0.32 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 1.22 micron |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | - |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | July 2025 | August 2024 |
| Release date | July 2025 | August 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | $799 |
| Successor | - | - Google Pixel 10 |
| SAR (head) | - | 0.99 W/kg |
| SAR (body) | - | 1.4 W/kg |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Not included |
Further details
Notes on Phone (3):
- The Indian model has a 5500 mAh battery, compared to 5150 mAh in the international one, (including the U.S. version).
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Nothing Phone (3). It has a better display, performance, gaming, and battery life.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 34