Nothing Phone (3a) vs Honor 200

66 out of 100
Nothing Phone (3a)
VS
67 out of 100
Honor 200

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.77-inch Nothing Phone (3a) (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3) that was released on March 4, 2025, against the Honor 200, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 and came out 9 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Nothing Phone (3a)
  • Water-resistant body (IP64 classification)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
  • The phone is 9 months newer
Reasons to consider the Honor 200
  • The rear camera has a 2.5x optical zoom
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 50W)
  • Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR5 3200 MHz
  • 13% higher pixel density (436 vs 387 PPI)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 3.1 versus UFS 2.2
  • Reverse charging feature
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
  • Ready for eSIM technology
  • Has a built-in infrared port

Review

Evaluation of Nothing Phone (3a) and Honor 200 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 128 GB
VS
8 / 256 GB
72.8
(Good)
Value Index
68.4
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type AMOLED OLED
Size 6.77 inches 6.7 inches
Resolution 1080 x 2392 pixels 1200 x 2664 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.9:9 19.98:9
PPI 387 ppi 436 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1300 nits 1200 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3000 nits 4000 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, HDR10+
Screen protection Panda Glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 87.7% 90%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.8% -
PWM 90 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Peak brightness test (auto)
1270 nits
n/a
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 163.52 mm (6.44 inches) 161.5 mm (6.36 inches)
Width 77.5 mm (3.05 inches) 74.6 mm (2.94 inches)
Thickness 8.35 mm (0.33 inches) 7.7 mm (0.3 inches)
Weight 201 g (7.09 oz) 187 g (6.6 oz)
Waterproof IP64 No
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber -
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Plastic Plastic
Colors White, Black, Blue White, Green, Pink
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Average (2.84/5) -
Drop resistance Good (C) · 90 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio
87.7%
Honor 200 +3%
90%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Nothing Phone (3a) and Honor 200
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
Max clock 2500 MHz 2630 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520)
- 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720)
- 1 core at 2.5 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720)
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A510)
- 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A715)
- 1 core at 2.63 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A715)
L3 cache - 3 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
GPU
Graphics Adreno 810 Adreno 720
GPU shading units 256 512
GPU clock 1050 MHz 975 MHz
FLOPS ~537.6 GFLOPS ~998.4 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Nothing Phone (3a) and Honor 200
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
1158
1147
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
3276
3214
Compute Score (GPU)
Phone (3a) +24%
4435
3581
Compute Score (GPU) 4435 3581
Single-core score 1158 1147
Multi-core score 3276 3214
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
1050601
1002480
CPU 402549 364727
GPU 179108 228932
Memory 194640 164585
UX 274304 244236
Total score 1050601 1002480
Samples [38 tests] [36 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Honor 200 +39%
525
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 3 FPS 4 FPS
Graphics score 379 525
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
12382
n/a
Web score 11533 -
Video editing 6290 -
Photo editing 20294 -
Data manipulation 10511 -
Writing score 16899 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Nothing Phone (3a)
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-10 -> ratulislam-55CPU Throttle82%
📘 2026-07-10 -> ratulislam-55GeekBench GPU3328
📘 2026-07-10 -> ratulislam-55GeekBench CPU1158 / 3276
📘 2026-06-07 (Aames Ng)AnTuTu1069149
📘 2026-06-03 (xperz3650)AnTuTu1065584
Honor 200
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-02 (Ryno)AnTuTu997900
📘 2026-06-30 (Empire)AnTuTu1094330
📘 2026-04-26 (Seitekx)AnTuTu987155
📘 2026-04-20 (Pro100Goose)AnTuTu1019297
📘 2026-04-04 -> AlexxAnTuTu1005948

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory clock 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 3.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM Nothing OS 4.0 MagicOS 10
OS updates 3 years 2 years
Security updates 4 years 3 years

Battery

Capacity 5000 mAh 5200 mAh
Max charge power 50 W 100 W
Battery type Li-Po Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No Yes
Bypass charging No No
Fast charging Yes (61% in 30 min) Yes (75% in 30 min)
Full charging time 1:06 hr 0:45 hr
Battery cycles 1400 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 08:06 hr -
Watching video 16:25 hr -
Gaming 05:49 hr -
Standby 131 hr -
General battery life
25:03 hr
n/a

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 2x Optical, 2.5x
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (720p) -
Angle of widest lens 120° 112°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/2.0
Focal length 24 mm -
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL S5KGN9 Sony IMX906
Sensor size 1/1.57" (≈ 0.64 inch) 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.6 f/2.4
Focal length 50 mm -
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL Sony IMX856
Sensor size 1/2.74" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.51" (≈ 0.4 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron -
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX355 -
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh - 65
Preview - 61
Zoom - 124
Samples - Photo samples of Honor 200 from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 6560 x 4928 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.1
Focal length 22 mm -
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL CMOS
Sensor size 1/3.44" (≈ 0.29 inch) -
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port No Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* - 18
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No No
Speakers test
Max loudness
90.5 dB
n/a

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced March 2025 May 2024
Release date March 2025 May 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $329 $499
Successor - Nothing Phone (4a) - Honor 500
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 100 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the gaming, battery life, and software are more important to you, then choose the Honor 200. But if the design is more of a priority – go for the Nothing Phone (3a).

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
25 (16.2%)
129 (83.8%)
Total votes: 154

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!