Oppo Find X8 Ultra vs Honor Magic 8

90 out of 100
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
VS
90 out of 100
Honor Magic 8

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.82-inch Oppo Find X8 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite) that was released on April 10, 2025, against the Honor Magic 8, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and came out 6 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X8 Ultra
  • The rear camera has a 6x optical zoom
  • Slow-motion recording at 480FPS
  • 11% higher pixel density (510 vs 461 PPI)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
Reasons to consider the Honor Magic 8
  • Comes with 900 mAh larger battery capacity: 7000 vs 6100 mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • 27% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4037K versus 3183K)
  • 20% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3722 and 3103 points
  • Weighs 21 grams less
  • The phone is 6 months newer
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Oppo Find X8 Ultra and Honor Magic 8 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
34.0
(Mediocre)
Value Index
86.7
(Very good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED OLED
Size 6.82 inches 6.58 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3168 pixels 1256 x 2760 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 510 ppi 461 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1600 nits 1800 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 2500 nits 6000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 240 Hz -
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass Giant Rhino Glass
Screen-to-body ratio 89.7% 89.9%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 100% -
PWM 121 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Screen space comparison
Find X8 Ultra
6.82″ (20:9 ratio) = 17.4 in2
Magic 8
6.58″ (20:9 ratio) = 16.2 in2
~7% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
1166 nits
n/a
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 163.09 mm (6.42 inches) 157.1 mm (6.19 inches)
Width 76.8 mm (3.02 inches) 74 mm (2.91 inches)
Thickness 8.78 mm (0.35 inches) 8 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 226 g (7.97 oz) 205 g (7.23 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass -
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Pink White, Black, Gold, Green
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio
89.9%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Oppo Find X8 Ultra and Honor Magic 8
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Max clock 4320 MHz 4600 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
- 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
L3 cache 8 MB 12 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 830 Adreno 840
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1100 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Oppo Find X8 Ultra and Honor Magic 8
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Magic 8 +20%
3722
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Magic 8 +17%
11420
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 25197 -
Single-core score 3103 3722
Multi-core score 9772 11420
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
3183101
Magic 8 +27%
4037547
CPU 961436 1237864
GPU 1059315 1445114
Memory 516419 464843
UX 645931 889726
Total score 3183101 4037547
Samples Less than 3 [6 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 72% -
Graphics test 19 FPS -
Graphics score 2512 -
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 44 FPS -
Section 1 49 FPS -
Section 2 44 FPS -
Section 3 37 FPS -
Graphics score 11466 -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Stability 67% -
Graphics test 37 FPS -
Graphics score 6180 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 21490 -
Video editing 8016 -
Photo editing 29166 -
Data manipulation 17803 -
Writing score 23531 -
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (65th and 14th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
No benchmark results yet
Honor Magic 8
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-06-04 (ven)AnTuTu3838361
📘 2026-04-23 (neoneos4zoom)AnTuTu4084669
📘 2026-04-10 (neoneos4zoom)GeekBench CPU3722 / 11420
📘 2026-04-10 (neoneos4zoom)AnTuTu4037547
📘 2026-04-09 (neoneos4zoom)GeekBench CPU3712 / 11192

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 16
ROM ColorOS 16 MagicOS 10
OS updates 4 years 7 years
Security updates 5 years 7 years

Battery

Capacity 6100 mAh 7000 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 90 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) Yes (80 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging - Yes
Fast charging Yes (58% in 15 min) Yes
Full charging time 0:37 hr -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 13:45 hr -
Watching video 18:49 hr -
Gaming 06:44 hr -
Standby 109 hr -
General battery life
28:25 hr
n/a

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 6x Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 480 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 120° 122°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Telephoto: 50 MP
4) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 64 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.9
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-900 -
Sensor size 1/1" (≈ 1 inch) 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1.6 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 64 MP
Aperture f/2.1 f/2.5
Focal length 70 mm -
Sensor Sony LYT-700C -
Sensor size 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) -
Pixel size 1 micron -
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 15 mm 12 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN5 -
Sensor size 1/2.75" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.61 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 175 -
Zoom 151 -
Samples Photo samples of Oppo Find X8 Ultra from DxOMark -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 6560 x 4928 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.0
Focal length 21 mm 21 mm
Sensor LYT-506 -
Sensor size 1/2.74" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.93" (≈ 0.34 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.6 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes, DP 1.2
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
84.2 dB
n/a

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced April 2025 October 2025
Release date April 2025 October 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $999 $630
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Face recognition sensor
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 100 W -
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the camera and sound are more important to you, then choose the Oppo Find X8 Ultra. But if the gaming, battery life, software, and design are more of a priority – go for the Honor Magic 8.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
1 (25%)
3 (75%)
Total votes: 4

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!