Home > Smartphone comparison > Find X9 Pro vs OnePlus 15 – which one to choose?

Oppo Find X9 Pro vs OnePlus 15

93 out of 100
Oppo Find X9 Pro
VS
93 out of 100
OnePlus 15
Oppo Find X9 Pro
OnePlus 15

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.78-inch Oppo Find X9 Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 9500) that was released on October 16, 2025, against the OnePlus 15, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 . On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments (3)

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X9 Pro
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
Reasons to consider the OnePlus 15
  • Delivers 88% higher peak brightness (3365 against 1790 nits)
  • Higher display refresh rate – 165 Hz
  • Shows 11% longer battery life (39:14 vs 35:19 hours)
  • The rear camera has a 3.5x optical zoom
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 80W)
  • 14% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4008K versus 3508K)

Review

Evaluation of Oppo Find X9 Pro and OnePlus 15 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
42.0
(Average)
Value Index
66.9
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
Find X9 Pro
vs
OnePlus 15

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.78 inches 6.78 inches
Resolution 1264 x 2780 pixels 1272 x 2772 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
PPI 450 ppi 450 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1800 nits 1800 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3600 nits 6000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 240 Hz 330 Hz
Screen protection Gorilla Glass Victus 2 Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Screen-to-body ratio 90% 91.2%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 98.3% 99.9%
PWM 354 Hz 120 Hz
Response time 7 ms 3 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
Find X9 Pro
1790 nits
OnePlus 15 +88%
3365 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 161.26 mm (6.35 inches) 161.42 mm (6.36 inches)
Width 76.46 mm (3.01 inches) 76.67 mm (3.02 inches)
Thickness 8.25 mm (0.32 inches) 8.1 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 224 g (7.9 oz) 211 g (7.44 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Gray, Red Black, Gold, Purple
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Good (3.82/5) Good (3.69/5)
Drop resistance Good (C) · 90 drops Good (C) · 90 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
Find X9 Pro
90%
OnePlus 15 +1%
91.2%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Oppo Find X9 Pro and OnePlus 15
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9500 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Max clock 4210 MHz 4600 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro
- 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium
- 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra		 - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
L3 cache 16 MB 12 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 990 Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 Adreno 840
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1716 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~5271.5 GFLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Oppo Find X9 Pro and OnePlus 15
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Find X9 Pro
3422
OnePlus 15 +5%
3607
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Find X9 Pro
10065
OnePlus 15 +7%
10732
Compute Score (GPU)
Find X9 Pro +10%
26944
OnePlus 15
24461
Compute Score (GPU) 26944 24461
Single-core score 3422 3607
Multi-core score 10065 10732
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Find X9 Pro
3508681
OnePlus 15 +14%
4008294
CPU 1098383 1184036
GPU 1275843 1490867
Memory 378116 402813
UX 756339 930578
Total score 3508681 4008294
Samples [17 tests] [45 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Find X9 Pro +11%
3009
OnePlus 15
2699
Stability 52% 78%
Graphics test 22 FPS 20 FPS
Graphics score 3009 2699
3DMark Solar Bay
Find X9 Pro +6%
13319
OnePlus 15
12540
Graphics test 51 FPS 48 FPS
Section 1 55 FPS 56 FPS
Section 2 52 FPS 47 FPS
Section 3 43 FPS 39 FPS
Graphics score 13319 12540
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Find X9 Pro
13143
OnePlus 15 +19%
15658
Web score 11183 15531
Video editing 5850 6678
Photo editing 22747 26644
Data manipulation 13395 14971
Writing score 19055 20874
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (43rd and 19th place)
Submit your benchmark results

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Oppo Find X9 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-26 -> FrostbyteXAnTuTu 113454088
📘 2026-07-14 (7kxlz)AnTuTu 113520797
📘 2026-05-23 (Valerij)AnTuTu 113562181
📘 2026-05-23 (Awie97#)AnTuTu 113515251
📘 2026-04-29 (Alijka)AnTuTu 113473300
Add View all (25)
OnePlus 15
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-08 -> aleshkaAnTuTu 123914618
📘 2026-09-05 (Mehdi)AnTuTu 113651261
📘 2026-08-24 -> Ang3L4DAnTuTu 114057387
📘 2026-08-15 (YurOk)AnTuTu 113870500
📘 2026-08-07 (@zokhidjonovch)AnTuTu 114470263
Add View all (58)

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5333 MHz 5333 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM ColorOS 16 OxygenOS 16
OS size 58 GB 26 GB
OS updates 5 years 4 years
Security updates 6 years 6 years

Battery

Capacity 7500 mAh 7300 mAh
Max charge power 80 W 120 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) Yes (50 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes (54% in 30 min) Yes (50% in 15 min)
Full charging time 1:20 hr 0:43 hr
Battery cycles 1300 cycles 1100 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 19:04 hr 18:32 hr
Watching video 25:00 hr 28:44 hr
Gaming 10:24 hr 10:01 hr
Standby 107 hr 139 hr
General battery life
Find X9 Pro
35:19 hr
OnePlus 15 +11%
39:14 hr
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 3.5x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 120FPS
Slow motion 480 FPS (720p) 480 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens 120° 116°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 200 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support		 - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.5 f/1.8
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-828 Sony IMX906
Sensor size 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1.22 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 200 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.1 f/2.8
Focal length 70 mm 85 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL HP5 Samsung S5KJN5
Sensor size 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.5 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 15 mm 16 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN5 OmniVision OV50D
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.612 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 180 -
Zoom 131 -
Samples Photo samples of Oppo Find X9 Pro from DxOMark -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 6560 x 4928
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.4
Focal length 21 mm 21 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN5 Sony IMX709
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.74" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.64 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
Find X9 Pro +7%
86.4 dB
OnePlus 15
80.4 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced October 2025 October 2025
Release date October 2025 October 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $1299 $899
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint		 - Hall-effect sensor
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 80 W Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the sound is more important to you, then choose the Oppo Find X9 Pro. But if the software is more of a priority – go for the OnePlus 15.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
378 (37.6%)
627 (62.4%)
Total votes: 1005

Related comparisons

1. Oppo Find X9 Pro vs Oppo Find X8 Pro
2. Oppo Find X9 Pro vs Oppo Find X8 Ultra (2)
3. Oppo Find X9 Pro vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro
4. Oppo Find X9 Pro vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (4)
5. Oppo Find X9 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro (21)
6. OnePlus 15 vs Apple iPhone 17 (3)
7. OnePlus 15 vs OnePlus 13 (6)
8. OnePlus 15 vs Google Pixel 10 Pro
9. OnePlus 15 vs OnePlus 12
10. OnePlus 15 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (3)
Compare other phones (860+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Nesha August 18, 2026 at 03:41 PM
Both devices are brilliant, the price for me is identical, I decided on the OnePlus 15 - 16/512 and I was not wrong, it arrived 3 months earlier here, it is a question of different processors and with Oppo only 1 is the strongest weaker than 2 stronger with 1+ but I give credit to the Oppo find x9 pro because you get a charger in a vacuum package, with this one no, a big minus, produced at the same time. The original charger cannot be bought in Serbia, while for Realme it costs €80, and there is only a 50w Xiaomi wireless charger and it is very ugly. Good lack! 😎
+1 Reply
Avatar
SPLIX December 10, 2025 at 05:09 AM
the screen on the OnePlus 15 is better but i don't think a person will notice the difference. the camera is better on the oppo find x9 pro , not that much, the battery about the same and 1 extra point on the sound for oppo, over all for numbers and points OnePlus 15 wins👑. in reality it's about the price. u should keep in mind OnePlus 15 doesn't include charger.
+4 Reply
Avatar
No Charger :( December 18, 2025 at 02:15 AM
In EU. Hate this BS. Same for flaky USB-C ports. Convenient in use, but sucky durability.
+3 Reply
EnglishРусский