Oppo Find X9 Ultra vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.82-inch Oppo Find X9 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on April 21, 2026, against the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL, which is powered by Google Tensor G5 and came out 8 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X9 Ultra
  • 2.6x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4231K versus 1617K)
  • Shows 60% longer battery life (37:00 vs 23:06 hours)
  • Comes with 1850 mAh larger battery capacity: 7050 vs 5200 mAh
  • The rear camera has a 10x optical zoom
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Delivers 43% higher peak brightness (3349 against 2336 nits)
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 45W)
  • Slow-motion recording at 480FPS
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
  • Has 33% more RAM: 16GB versus 12GB
  • More recent OS version: Android 17 versus 16

Review

Evaluation of Oppo Find X9 Ultra and Google Pixel 10 Pro XL crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
16 / 256 GB
37.3
(Mediocre)
Value Index
45.0
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED OLED
Size 6.82 inches 6.8 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3168 pixels 1344 x 2992 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.8:9 20:9
PPI 510 ppi 486 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1800 nits 3300 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3600 nits 2200 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz -
Screen protection Gorilla Glass Victus 2 Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Screen-to-body ratio 90% 89.5%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space 99.5% 96.2%
PWM 90 Hz 240 Hz
Response time 1 ms 3 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
3349 nits
2336 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 163.16 mm (6.42 inches) 162.8 mm (6.41 inches)
Width 76.97 mm (3.03 inches) 76.6 mm (3.02 inches)
Thickness 8.65 mm (0.34 inches) 8.5 mm (0.33 inches)
Weight 235 g (8.29 oz) 232 g (8.18 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP68
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Green, Orange White, Black, Gray, Green
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3.66/5)
Drop resistance - Excellent (A) · 270 drops
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Oppo Find X9 Ultra and Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Google Tensor G5
Max clock 4600 MHz 3780 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 5 + 2)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
- 2 cores at 2.25 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 5 cores at 3.05 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 1 core at 3.78 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Yes
GPU
Graphics Adreno 840 PowerVR DXT-48-1536
GPU shading units 1536 768
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~1689.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Oppo Find X9 Ultra and Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
10744
Compute Score (GPU)
27916
Compute Score (GPU) 27916 3760
Single-core score 3536 2305
Multi-core score 10744 6054
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
4231988
1617706
CPU 1184661 760240
GPU 1577144 181200
Memory 509054 267804
UX 961129 408462
Total score 4231988 1617706
Samples [5 tests] [3 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability - 93%
Graphics test - 8 FPS
Graphics score - 1012
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 17237
Video editing - 7203
Photo editing - 24584
Data manipulation - 14036
Writing score - 20213

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Oppo Find X9 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-21 (IlyaLub)AnTuTu 114231988
📘 2026-07-19 (KY.w)Geekbench 6 GPU23623
📘 2026-07-19 (KY.w)Geekbench 6 CPU3536 / 10744
📘 2026-07-19 (KY.w)AnTuTu 113766077
📘 2026-07-15 (IlyaLub)AnTuTu 114231988
Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-25 (Dolbaeb)AnTuTu 121549159
📘 2026-07-16 (fox_sky)AnTuTu 111629394
📘 2026-06-05 (dunkiegaming)Geekbench 6 GPU4116
📘 2026-06-05 (dunkiegaming)Geekbench 6 CPU2295 / 6133
📘 2026-05-17 (Dustigen)AnTuTu 111487891

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 16 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16 (Can be upgraded to Android 17)
ROM ColorOS 16 Stock Android
OS size 31.6 GB 23 GB
OS updates 5 years 7 years
Security updates 6 years 7 years

Battery

Capacity 7050 mAh 5200 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 45 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) Yes (23 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes -
Fast charging Yes (75% in 30 min) Yes (59% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:45 hr 1:22 hr
Battery cycles - 1000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 16:45 hr 11:06 hr
Watching video 26:15 hr 17:14 hr
Gaming 08:23 hr 05:08 hr
Standby 144 hr 81 hr
General battery life
37:00 hr
23:06 hr

Main camera

Matrix 200 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 16320 x 12240 8160 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 10x Optical, 5x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 240FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 480 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 120° 123°
Lenses 1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 200 MP
3) Telephoto: 50 MP
4) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 48 MP
3) Ultrawide: 48 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 200 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.5 f/1.7
Focal length 23 mm 25 mm
Sensor Sony LYTIA-901 Samsung GNV
Sensor size 1/1.12" (≈ 0.89 inch) 1/1.31" (≈ 0.76 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 1.2 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 200 MP 48 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.8
Focal length 70 mm 113 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV52A Samsung S5KGM5
Sensor size 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch)
Pixel size 0.61 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 48 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/1.7
Focal length 14 mm 12 mm
Sensor Sony LYTIA-600 Samsung S5KGM5
Sensor size 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 185 160
Zoom 173 141
Samples Photo samples of Oppo Find X9 Ultra from DxOMark Photo samples of Google Pixel 10 Pro XL from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 42 megapixels
Image resolution 8160 x 6128 3648 x 2736
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.2
Focal length 21 mm 17 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL JN5 Sony IMX858
Sensor size 1/2.75" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.51" (≈ 0.4 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.7 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Galileo
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No No
Speakers test
Max loudness
88.9 dB
85.9 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced April 2026 August 2025
Release date May 2026 August 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $1299 $1199
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Not included
Further details
Notes on Pixel 10 Pro XL:
    - Supports Bypass Charge.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Oppo Find X9 Ultra is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
21 (70%)
9 (30%)
Total votes: 30

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!