Oppo Find X9 Ultra vs Huawei Pura X View
95
out of 100
VS
78
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.82-inch Oppo Find X9 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on April 21, 2026, against the Huawei Pura X View, which is powered by HiSilicon Kirin 9030S and came out 4 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X9 Ultra
- 3.2x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4231K versus 1322K)
- The rear camera has a 10x optical zoom
- 26% higher pixel density (510 vs 406 PPI)
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- Has a 0.43 inch larger screen size
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 66W)
- Better grip in hands – the body is 10.03 mm narrower
- 2.8x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3536 and 1265 points
- More energy-efficient CPU – Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Reasons to consider the Huawei Pura X View
- Weighs 34 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.82 inches | 6.39 inches |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels | 1320 x 2232 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.8:9 | 16:9.5 |
| PPI | 510 ppi | 406 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | - |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 3600 nits | 6500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10 |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Kunlun Glass 2 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 92.3% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.5% | - |
| PWM | 90 Hz | - |
| Response time | 1 ms | - |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | - |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 163.16 mm (6.42 inches) | 144.1 mm (5.67 inches) |
| Width | 76.97 mm (3.03 inches) | 87 mm (3.43 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.65 mm (0.34 inches) | 6.7 mm (0.26 inches) |
| Weight | 235 g (8.29 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Green, Orange | White, Black, Gray, Red |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | HiSilicon Kirin 9030S |
| Max clock | 4600 MHz | 2700 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance - 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime |
- 4 cores at 1.62 GHz: Taishan v124 Little - 3 cores at 2.15 GHz: Taishan v124 Mid - 1 core at 2.7 GHz: Taishan v124 Big |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | SMIC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 5 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Da Vinci |
| Graphics | Adreno 840 | Maleoon 935F |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 933 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS | ~1433.1 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 27916 | 4482 |
| Single-core score | 3536 | 1265 |
| Multi-core score | 10744 | 4432 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 1184661 | 471010 |
| GPU | 1577144 | 249478 |
| Memory | 509054 | 313210 |
| UX | 961129 | 289223 |
| Total score | 4231988 | 1322921 |
| Samples | [5 tests] | Less than 3 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#17th place)
Recent User Tests
Oppo Find X9 Ultra
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-07-21 (IlyaLub) | AnTuTu 11 | 4231988 |
| 📘 2026-07-19 (KY.w) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 23623 |
| 📘 2026-07-19 (KY.w) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 3536 / 10744 |
| 📘 2026-07-19 (KY.w) | AnTuTu 11 | 3766077 |
| 📘 2026-07-15 (IlyaLub) | AnTuTu 11 | 4231988 |
Huawei Pura X View
No benchmark results yet
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 5300 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | HarmonyOS 7.0 |
| ROM | ColorOS 16 | - |
| OS size | 31.6 GB | - |
| OS updates | 5 years | - |
| Security updates | 6 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 7050 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 100 W | 66 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (50 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | Yes | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (75% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full charging time | 0:45 hr | - |
| Web browsing | 16:45 hr | - |
| Watching video | 26:15 hr | - |
| Gaming | 08:23 hr | - |
| Standby | 144 hr | - |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#9th place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 megapixels | 200 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 16320 x 12240 | - |
| Zoom | Optical, 10x | Optical, 3.7x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 240FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 480 FPS (720p) | - |
| Angle of widest lens | 120° | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 200 MP 2) Telephoto: 200 MP 3) Telephoto: 50 MP 4) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 200 MP 2) Telephoto: 200 MP 3) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYTIA-901 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.12" (≈ 0.89 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | 70 mm | 88 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV52A | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.61 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 14 mm | 16 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYTIA-600 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 185 | - |
| Zoom | 173 | - |
| Samples | Photo samples of Oppo Find X9 Ultra from DxOMark | - |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8160 x 6128 | - |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | - |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL JN5 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.75" (≈ 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | April 2026 | September 2026 |
| Release date | May 2026 | October 2026 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1299 | - |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Hall-effect sensor - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 100 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Oppo Find X9 Ultra is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1