Oppo Find X9s Pro vs X9 Pro
91
out of 100
VS
93
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.32-inch Oppo Find X9s Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 9500) that was released on April 21, 2026, against the Oppo Find X9 Pro, which is powered by the same chip and came out 6 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X9s Pro
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.1)
- The phone is 6 months newer
- Weighs 26 grams less
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X9 Pro
- Delivers 63% higher peak brightness (1790 against 1099 nits)
- The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
- Has a 0.46 inch larger screen size
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.32 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1216 x 2640 pixels | 1264 x 2780 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 460 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | 1800 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 3600 nits | 3600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9% | 90% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.4% | 98.3% |
| PWM | 167 Hz | 354 Hz |
| Response time | 3 ms | 7 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | ∞ Infinity |
Screen space comparison
Find X9 Pro
6.78″ (20:9 ratio) = 17.2 in2
Find X9s Pro
6.32″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 15.2 in2
~13% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 150.5 mm (5.93 inches) | 161.26 mm (6.35 inches) |
| Width | 71.7 mm (2.82 inches) | 76.46 mm (3.01 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm (0.33 inches) | 8.25 mm (0.32 inches) |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 224 g (7.9 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Gray, Blue, Orange | White, Gray, Red |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | - | Good (3.82/5) |
| Drop resistance | - | Good (C) · 90 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| Max clock | 4210 MHz | 4210 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro - 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium - 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra |
- 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro - 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium - 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 16 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 990 | MediaTek NPU 990 |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1716 MHz | 1716 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~5271.5 GFLOPS | ~5271.5 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | - | 26944 |
| Single-core score | 3302 | 3422 |
| Multi-core score | 10598 | 10065 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 909385 | 1098383 |
| GPU | 1204662 | 1275843 |
| Memory | 403028 | 378116 |
| UX | 757015 | 756339 |
| Total score | 3274090 | 3508681 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [17 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 52% |
| Graphics test | - | 22 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 3009 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | - | 51 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 55 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 52 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 43 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 13319 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 11183 |
| Video editing | - | 5850 |
| Photo editing | - | 22747 |
| Data manipulation | - | 13395 |
| Writing score | - | 19055 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (58th and 43rd place)
Recent User Tests
Oppo Find X9s Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-07-27 (zwatoo) | AnTuTu 11 | 3274090 |
Oppo Find X9 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-07-26 -> FrostbyteX | AnTuTu 11 | 3454088 |
| 📘 2026-07-14 (7kxlz) | AnTuTu 11 | 3520797 |
| 📘 2026-05-23 (Valerij) | AnTuTu 11 | 3562181 |
| 📘 2026-05-23 (Awie97#) | AnTuTu 11 | 3515251 |
| 📘 2026-04-29 (Alijka) | AnTuTu 11 | 3473300 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | - | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| ROM | ColorOS 16 | ColorOS 16 |
| OS size | 58 GB | 58 GB |
| OS updates | 5 years | 5 years |
| Security updates | 6 years | 6 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 7025 mAh | 7500 mAh |
| Max charge power | 80 W | 80 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (50 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes (54% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | - | 1:20 hr |
| Battery cycles | - | 1300 cycles |
| Web browsing | - | 19:04 hr |
| Watching video | - | 25:00 hr |
| Gaming | - | 10:24 hr |
| Standby | - | 107 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#13th place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 2.8x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 120FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 240FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 480 FPS (720p) | 480 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 120° | 120° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 200 MP 2) Telephoto: 200 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 200 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.5 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP9 | Sony LYT-828 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) | 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 1.22 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/2.1 |
| Focal length | 65 mm | 70 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP5 | Samsung ISOCELL HP5 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 0.5 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL JN5 | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | - | 180 |
| Zoom | - | 131 |
| Samples | - | Photo samples of Oppo Find X9 Pro from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | - | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.1 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | - | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | April 2026 | October 2025 |
| Release date | May 2026 | October 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $780 | $1299 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 80 W | Yes, 80 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Oppo Find X9 Pro. It has a better camera, connectivity, and sound.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 203