Home > Smartphone comparison > Reno 14 vs Honor 400 – which one to choose?

Oppo Reno 14 vs Honor 400

72 out of 100
Oppo Reno 14
VS
69 out of 100
Honor 400
Oppo Reno 14
Honor 400

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.59-inch Oppo Reno 14 (with MediaTek Dimensity 8350) that was released on May 15, 2025, against the Honor 400, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments (2)

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 14
  • The rear camera has a 3.5x optical zoom
  • 59% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1724K versus 1087K)
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • 16% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1319 and 1136 points
Reasons to consider the Honor 400
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15

Review

Evaluation of Oppo Reno 14 and Honor 400 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Reno 14
76*
Honor 400
80*
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Reno 14
72*
Honor 400
69*
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 256 GB
102.8
(Excellent)
Value Index
53.2
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
Reno 14
vs
Honor 400

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.59 inches 6.55 inches
Resolution 1256 x 2760 pixels 1264 x 2736 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
PPI 460 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes
Max rated brightness 600 nits 1600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 1200 nits 5000 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 240 Hz 240 Hz
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 7i Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 88.8% 90.2%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Peak brightness test (auto)
Reno 14
n/a
Honor 400
1540 nits

Design and build

Height 157.9 mm (6.22 inches) 156.5 mm (6.16 inches)
Width 74.73 mm (2.94 inches) 74.6 mm (2.94 inches)
Thickness 7.42 mm (0.29 inches) 7.3 mm (0.29 inches)
Weight 187 g (6.6 oz) 184 g (6.49 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP66
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Plastic
Frame material Metal Plastic
Colors White, Black, Green Black, Silver, Gold, Blue
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Good (3.74/5) Good (3.63/5)
Drop resistance Very good (B) Β· 180 drops Very good (B) Β· 180 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
Reno 14
88.8%
Honor 400 +2%
90.2%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Oppo Reno 14 and Honor 400
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
Max clock 3350 MHz 2630 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A510
- 3 cores at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-A715
- 1 core at 3.35 GHz: Cortex-A715		 - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A510)
- 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A715)
- 1 core at 2.63 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A715)
L3 cache 4 MB 3 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 780 Yes
GPU
Graphics Mali-G615 MP6 Adreno 720
GPU shading units 768 512
GPU clock 1400 MHz 975 MHz
FLOPS ~2150.4 GFLOPS ~998.4 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Oppo Reno 14 and Honor 400
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Reno 14 +16%
1319
Honor 400
1136
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Reno 14 +31%
4067
Honor 400
3107
Compute Score (GPU)
Reno 14 +110%
8534
Honor 400
4060
Compute Score (GPU) 8534 4060
Single-core score 1319 1136
Multi-core score 4067 3107
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Reno 14 +59%
1724757
Honor 400
1087525
CPU 514672 403084
GPU 480538 207834
Memory 275946 216538
UX 453601 260069
Total score 1724757 1087525
Samples [14 tests] [32 tests]
Submit your benchmark results

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Oppo Reno 14
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-19 (K)AnTuTu 111656870
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-20 (Vishal)AnTuTu 111588535
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-13 (Wal)AnTuTu 111732207
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-28 (Jj_Cnstn)AnTuTu 111743814
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-15 (Gabriel Pereira)AnTuTu 111724757
Add View all (18)
Honor 400
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-11 (Baclaven)AnTuTu 11947758
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-15 (Iulitic211Rg)AnTuTu 111102591
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-04 (TheOdin)AnTuTu 111098513
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-08 (brozzlex)AnTuTu 111089031
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-02 (ElijaHaH)Geekbench 6 GPU3475
Add View all (39)

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM ColorOS 15 MagicOS 10
OS updates 6 years 6 years
Security updates - 6 years

Battery

Capacity 6000 mAh 6000 mAh
Max charge power 80 W 80 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging - Yes
Fast charging Yes (75% in 30 min) Yes (80% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:50 hr 0:41 hr
Battery cycles 1600 cycles 1200 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing - 09:20 hr
Watching video - 12:17 hr
Gaming - 05:43 hr
Standby - 121 hr
General battery life
Reno 14
n/a
Honor 400
23:16 hr
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 200 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 16384 x 12288
Zoom Optical, 3.5x Digital
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (720p) -
Angle of widest lens 116Β° 112Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Ultrawide: 12 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.9
Focal length 26 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX882 Samsung ISOCELL HP3
Sensor size 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch) 1/1.4" (β‰ˆ 0.71 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.56 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP -
Aperture f/2.8 -
Focal length 80 mm -
Sensor Samsung S5KJN5 -
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) -
Pixel size 0.6 micron -
Stabilization Optical -
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX355 -
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 21 mm -
Sensor Samsung S5KJN5 CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) -
Pixel size 0.6 micron 0.64 micron
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No No

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced May 2025 May 2025
Release date May 2025 May 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $400 $499
Successor - Oppo Reno 15 - Honor 500
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint		 - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 80 W Yes, 100 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the performance, gaming, battery life, and design are more important to you, then choose the Oppo Reno 14. But if the camera, software, and sound are more of a priority – go for the Honor 400.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
118 (71.5%)
47 (28.5%)
Total votes: 165

Related comparisons

1. Honor 400 vs Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (7)
2. Honor 400 vs Honor 400 Pro
3. Honor 400 vs Honor X9c
4. Honor 400 vs Honor 200 (4)
5. Honor 400 vs Honor 400 Lite
6. Honor 400 vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
7. Honor 400 vs Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
8. Oppo Reno 14 vs Oppo Reno 14 Pro (4)
9. Oppo Reno 14 vs Oppo Reno 14 F 5G
10. Oppo Reno 14 vs Oppo Reno 13 5G (2)
Compare other phones (860+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Zelegor December 22, 2025 at 01:38 AM
Honor 400 has android update support for 6 years. Every other phone has only 4 years. This made an instant decision in this price categorie, i was even thinking about Motorola edge 60, Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro, even Xiaomi 15T and ofc Oppo. But i was looking for a phone for long-term, for atleast an other 6 years. Currently i have a Huawei P10 Lite and i still using it daily since 2017. I would like to support the that company which creates phone for years of usage, not for "trend". I'm sure i wont use 90% of Honor 400's features, but i will have it for 6 years atleast. People should use their phones for years too, so companies less likely make phones with planned obsolescence. People who buying new phones by trend should understand the impact of their behaviour. Companies could create phones for 10 years and their software updates wouldn't cause slowed interface if people would stop changing their phones constantly.
+4 Reply
Avatar
Hani June 9, 2025 at 05:26 PM
OPPO’s Reno 14 Pro 5G Certified by NBTC, IMDA, and BIS Authorities; Reno 14 and Reno 14 Pro Also Revealed to Support eSIM TECH WHISPERS
+2 Reply
EnglishРусский