Oppo Reno 15 Pro Max vs Honor Win
81
out of 100
VS
91
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.78-inch Oppo Reno 15 Pro Max (with MediaTek Dimensity 8450) that was released on January 2, 2026, against the Honor Win, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 15 Pro Max
- The rear camera has a 3.5x optical zoom
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
- Weighs 24 grams less
- Ready for eSIM technology
- Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Honor Win
- 87% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3991K versus 2131K)
- Comes with 3500 mAh larger battery capacity: 10000 vs 6500 mAh
- Higher display refresh rate β 185 Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 80W)
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 3.1
- 2.3x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3663 and 1608 points
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 inches | 6.83 inches |
| Resolution | 1272 x 2772 pixels | 1272 x 2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 450 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 185 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | 2000 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 3600 nits | 6000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 240 Hz | 480 Hz |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.6% | 90.2% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | - | 100% |
| PWM | - | 120 Hz |
| Response time | - | 1 ms |
| Contrast | - | β Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 161.26 mm (6.35 inches) | 163.1 mm (6.42 inches) |
| Width | 76.46 mm (3.01 inches) | 76.6 mm (3.02 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.65 mm (0.3 inches) | 8.3 mm (0.33 inches) |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 229 g (8.08 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Active fan |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gold, Brown | White, Black, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8450 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Max clock | 3250 MHz | 4610 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.1 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-A725 |
- 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance - 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 12 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 880 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G720 MP7 | Adreno 840 |
| GPU shading units | 896 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~2329.6 GFLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 12469 | 29142 |
| Single-core score | 1608 | 3663 |
| Multi-core score | 6321 | 10928 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 671568 | 1105325 |
| GPU | 654429 | 1579293 |
| Memory | 282208 | 469071 |
| UX | 523415 | 837485 |
| Total score | 2131620 | 3991174 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [17 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 70% |
| Graphics test | - | 20 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 2741 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | - | 45 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 53 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 45 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 38 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 11768 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 23048 |
| Video editing | - | 9158 |
| Photo editing | - | 40165 |
| Data manipulation | - | 18912 |
| Writing score | - | 25912 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#28th place)
Recent User Tests
Oppo Reno 15 Pro Max
No benchmark results yet
Honor Win
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-05 (Pyro) | AnTuTu 11 | 3918165 |
| π 2026-08-21 (Ilya) | AnTuTu 11 | 4007911 |
| π 2026-08-10 (SmileSoul) | AnTuTu 11 | 4260414 |
| π 2026-07-29 (SmileSoul) | AnTuTu 11 | 4119462 |
| π 2026-07-24 (Ilya) | AnTuTu 11 | 3927863 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 4266 MHz | 5300 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| ROM | ColorOS 16 | MagicOS 10 |
| OS size | - | 25 GB |
| OS updates | 5 years | 7 years |
| Security updates | 6 years | 7 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 6500 mAh | 10000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 80 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (50 W) | Yes (80 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (70% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 27 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:58 hr | 1:05 hr |
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 16320 x 12240 | 8160 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.5x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 120FPS |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (720p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 100Β° | 112Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 200 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | - |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP5 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.5 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 85 mm | - |
| Sensor size | - | 1/2" (β 0.5 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 0.8 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 16 mm | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 18 mm | 22 mm |
| Sensor | - | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | January 2026 | December 2025 |
| Release date | January 2026 | January 2026 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $800 | $699 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Face recognition sensor - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 80 W | Yes, 100 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Honor Win is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1
Related comparisons
8.
Honor Win vs Honor Win RT (3)