Samsung Galaxy S24 FE vs Oppo Reno 13 Pro 5G

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.7-inch Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (with Exynos 2400e) that was released on September 26, 2024, against the Oppo Reno 13 Pro 5G, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8350 and came out 2 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
  • Handles wireless charging up to 15W
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • 19% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1977K versus 1662K)
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 3.1
  • CPU with a higher amount of cores (+2)
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • 43% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2045 and 1432 points
  • Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 13 Pro 5G
  • Comes with 1100 mAh larger battery capacity: 5800 vs 4700 mAh
  • Shows 24% longer battery life (28:38 vs 23:02 hours)
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (80W versus 25W)
  • The rear camera has a 3.5x optical zoom
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • 17% higher pixel density (450 vs 385 PPI)
  • Has a built-in infrared port

Review

Evaluation of Samsung Galaxy S24 FE and Oppo Reno 13 Pro 5G crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 128 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
67.9
(Good)
Value Index
50.1
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type Dynamic AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.7 inches 6.83 inches
Resolution 1080 x 2340 pixels 1272 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 -
PPI 385 ppi 450 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes
Max rated brightness 1300 nits 1200 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 1900 nits -
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, HDR10+
Screen protection Gorilla Glass Victus Plus Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 88% 90.9%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 100% -
PWM 120 Hz -
Response time 2 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Peak brightness test (auto)
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 162 mm (6.38 inches) 162.8 mm (6.41 inches)
Width 77.3 mm (3.04 inches) 76.6 mm (3.02 inches)
Thickness 8 mm (0.31 inches) 7.6 mm (0.3 inches)
Weight 213 g (7.51 oz) 197 g (6.95 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Gray, Blue, Green, Yellow Black, Pink, Purple
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Good (3.11/5) Good (3.37/5)
Drop resistance Excellent (A) · 270 drops Good (C) · 120 drops
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Samsung Galaxy S24 FE and Oppo Reno 13 Pro 5G
SoC
Chipset Samsung Exynos 2400e MediaTek Dimensity 8350
Max clock 3110 MHz 3350 MHz
CPU cores 10 (1 + 2 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 3 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 2 cores at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.11 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A510
- 3 cores at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-A715
- 1 core at 3.35 GHz: Cortex-A715
L3 cache 8 MB 4 MB
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 780
GPU
Graphics Xclipse 940 Mali-G615 MP6
GPU shading units 768 768
GPU clock 1095 MHz 1400 MHz
FLOPS ~3406.8 GFLOPS ~2150.4 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Samsung Galaxy S24 FE and Oppo Reno 13 Pro 5G
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2045
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
6397
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 16611 -
Single-core score 2045 1432
Multi-core score 6397 4258
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
1977269
1662456
CPU 675682 459497
GPU 670589 489918
Memory 229976 276771
UX 401022 436240
Total score 1977269 1662456
Samples [55 tests] [3 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
1769
Stability 70% 65%
Graphics test 13 FPS 9 FPS
Graphics score 1769 1174
3DMark Solar Bay
7699
Graphics test 29 FPS 18 FPS
Section 1 35 FPS 19 FPS
Section 2 28 FPS 18 FPS
Section 3 24 FPS 16 FPS
Graphics score 7699 4723
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 15997 -
Video editing 8031 -
Photo editing 33878 -
Data manipulation 12347 -
Writing score 19836 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-21 (Vishnu)AnTuTu 122276561
📘 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShCPU Throttle81%
📘 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShAnTuTu 122134029
📘 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShCPU Throttle0%
📘 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShGeekbench 6 CPU2014 / 6373
Oppo Reno 13 Pro 5G
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-16 (Parvej)AnTuTu 121663473
📘 2025-12-23 (SHOUVIK SAHA)AnTuTu 111728323
📘 2025-11-29 (SHOUVIK SAHA)AnTuTu 111662456
📘 2025-11-28 (SHOUVIK SAHA)AnTuTu 111628998

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Memory clock 4200 MHz 3200 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 15
ROM One UI 8.0 ColorOS 15
OS size 23.5 GB -
OS updates 4 years 2 years
Security updates 7 years 4 years

Battery

Capacity 4700 mAh 5800 mAh
Max charge power 25 W 80 W
Battery type Li-Ion -
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (15 W) No
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes
Bypass charging No No
Fast charging Yes (56% in 30 min) Yes (77% in 30 min)
Full charging time 1:10 hr 0:42 hr
Battery cycles 2000 cycles 1600 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 07:20 hr 11:34 hr
Watching video 13:33 hr 18:04 hr
Gaming 05:11 hr 07:25 hr
Standby 129 hr 132 hr
General battery life
23:02 hr
28:38 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8160 x 6120 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 3.5x
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 123° 116°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 8 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.8
Focal length 24 mm 24 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL S5KGN3 Sony IMX890
Sensor size 1/1.57" (≈ 0.64 inch) 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 8 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.8
Focal length 75 mm 85 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV08A10 -
Sensor size 1/4.4" (≈ 0.23 inch) -
Pixel size 1 micron -
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 12 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 13 mm 15 mm
Sensor Samsung S5K3L6 -
Sensor size 1/3.0" (≈ 0.33 inch) 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 60 -
Preview 69 -
Zoom 126 -
Samples Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S24 FE from DxOMark -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 10 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 3648 x 2736 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.0
Focal length 26 mm 21 mm
Sensor Samsung S5K3J1 -
Sensor size 1/2.65" (≈ 0.38 inch) -
Pixel size 1.22 micron -
Autofocus No -
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port No Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 1 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes No
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* 20 -
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Flagship Mid-range
Announced September 2024 November 2024
Release date October 2024 November 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $649 $600
Successor - Samsung Galaxy S25 FE - Oppo Reno 15 Pro
SAR (head) 0.86 W/kg -
SAR (body) 1.29 W/kg -
Sensors - Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 80 W
Further details
Notes on Galaxy S24 FE:
    - The 128 GB variant features UFS 3.1 memory, other models have UFS 4.0.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the performance, gaming, connectivity, software, and sound are more important to you, then choose the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE. But if the camera and battery life are more of a priority – go for the Oppo Reno 13 Pro 5G.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
55 (58.5%)
39 (41.5%)
Total votes: 94

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!