Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 18 Pro Max

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.9-inch Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on February 25, 2026, against the Apple iPhone 18 Pro Max, which is powered by Apple A20 Pro and came out 6 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
  • Fingerprint scanner
  • 12% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3939K versus 3504K)
  • CPU with a higher amount of cores (+2)
  • Weighs 35 grams less
Reasons to consider the Apple iPhone 18 Pro Max
  • Shows 18% longer battery life (33:56 vs 28:50 hours)
  • The phone is 6 months newer
  • 30% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 4725 and 3624 points

Review

Evaluation of Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Apple iPhone 18 Pro Max crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
33.7
(Mediocre)
Value Index
38.2
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type Dynamic AMOLED OLED
Size 6.9 inches 6.9 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3120 pixels 1320 x 2868 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
PPI 500 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1500 nits 3000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 2600 nits 1600 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 240 Hz -
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Armor 2 Ceramic Shield 2
Screen-to-body ratio 91.4% 91.6%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Peak brightness test (auto)
2823 nits
2747 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 163.6 mm (6.44 inches) 163.4 mm (6.43 inches)
Width 78.1 mm (3.07 inches) 78 mm (3.07 inches)
Thickness 7.9 mm (0.31 inches) 8.75 mm (0.34 inches)
Weight 214 g (7.55 oz) 249 g (8.78 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP68
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Silver, Blue, Pink, Purple Black, Silver, Blue, Burgundy
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display No
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Apple iPhone 18 Pro Max
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Apple A20 Pro
Max clock 4740 MHz 4930 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 6 (2 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
- 4 cores at 2.64 GHz:
- 2 cores at 4.93 GHz:
L3 cache 12 MB -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 2 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Apple Neural Engine
GPU
Graphics Adreno 840 7 core Apple GPU
GPU shading units 1536 896
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1620 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~2903 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Apple iPhone 18 Pro Max
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 28391 55104
Single-core score 3624 4725
Multi-core score 11049 12575
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
3939244
CPU 1168602 964766
GPU 1520337 1393271
Memory 448779 400483
UX 801526 745645
Total score 3939244 3504165
Samples [32 tests] Less than 3
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 67% -
Graphics test 20 FPS -
Graphics score 2737 -
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 46 FPS -
Section 1 58 FPS -
Section 2 42 FPS -
Section 3 37 FPS -
Graphics score 11990 -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Graphics test 42 FPS -
Graphics score 7123 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 23390 -
Video editing 8217 -
Photo editing 37389 -
Data manipulation 18322 -
Writing score 32854 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Raze)AnTuTu 123920421
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 (Niko)AnTuTu 123439980
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-18 (KEKRiLL)AnTuTu 124208433
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-14 -> Mi7haAnTuTu 124485552
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 (Pavel)AnTuTu 113959848
Apple iPhone 18 Pro Max
No benchmark results yet

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz 4800 MHz
Channels 4 3
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 NVMe
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 iOS 27
ROM One UI 8.5 -
OS size 33.2 GB -
OS updates 7 years 7 years
Security updates 7 years 7 years

Battery

Capacity 5000 mAh 5567 mAh
Max charge power 60 W 60 W
Battery type Li-Ion Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (25 W) Yes (25 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes
Bypass charging Yes No
Fast charging Yes (84% in 30 min) Yes (81% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:43 hr 0:55 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 10:12 hr 14:13 hr
Watching video 21:39 hr 22:52 hr
Gaming 06:42 hr 08:36 hr
Standby 130 hr 146 hr
General battery life
28:50 hr
33:56 hr

Main camera

Matrix 200 megapixels 48 megapixels
Image resolution 16320 x 12240 8064 x 6048
Zoom Optical, 5x Optical, 4x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 240FPS Up to 120FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 120Β° 120Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Telephoto: 10 MP
4) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 48 MP
2) Telephoto: 48 MP
3) Ultrawide: 48 MP
4) Depth
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 200 MP 48 MP
Aperture f/1.4 f/1.5 - 4.0
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL S5KHP2 -
Sensor size 1/1.3" (β‰ˆ 0.77 inch) 1/1.28" (β‰ˆ 0.78 inch)
Pixel size 0.6 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 48 MP
Aperture f/2.9 f/2.8
Focal length 111 mm 100 mm
Sensor Sony IMX854 -
Sensor size 1/2.52" (β‰ˆ 0.4 inch) 1/2.55" (β‰ˆ 0.39 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 48 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/2.2
Focal length 13 mm 13 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN3 -
Sensor size 1/2.5" (β‰ˆ 0.4 inch) 1/2.55" (β‰ˆ 0.39 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 165 -
Zoom 141 -
Samples Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra from DxOMark -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 12 megapixels 18 megapixels
Image resolution 4000 x 3000 4896 x 3672
Aperture f/2.2 f/1.9
Focal length 23 mm 20 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL S5K3LU CMOS
Sensor size 1/3.2" (β‰ˆ 0.31 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Optical
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No Yes

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 1 -
Type of SIM card Nano eSIM
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced February 2026 September 2026
Release date March 2026 September 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $1299 $1299
SAR (head) 1.28 W/kg -
SAR (body) 1.35 W/kg -
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Face recognition sensor
Bundled charger Not included Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Apple iPhone 18 Pro Max. It has a better battery life and software.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
381 (70.8%)
157 (29.2%)
Total votes: 538

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Curious September 21, 2026 at 02:51 AM
I have lived long enough to see iPhone having more battery than samsung
+9 Reply
Avatar
Shogun of Konoha September 27, 2026 at 09:28 PM
Broooooooooo 😭😭😭😭
0 Reply
Avatar
Tech lover September 9, 2026 at 08:05 PM
A battle between two repetitive phones featuring only minuscule innovations. Honestly, how much of a difference is there really between them and the S23 Ultra or 15 Pro Max?
+6 Reply
Avatar
Nkc September 9, 2026 at 08:13 PM
For the average consumer , there is none
+6 Reply
Avatar
ComputerNerd September 9, 2026 at 10:22 PM
Yes! CPU performance and SSD download speeds are noticable better. Especially filming in 8k 30hz for Samsung. Also, night photos got massively better for Samsung since the S23 Ultra. IPhones added more RAM and improved battery life with a noticable battery size increase (5567 mAh).
0 Reply
Avatar
paul September 26, 2026 at 11:56 AM
ComputerNerd, anything past 8k is useless
0 Reply
Omar Karimi September 9, 2026 at 07:06 PM
The competition seems unfair since s26ultra has 8elete gen5 which is 2025 chop btw, but I would still go with s26ultra due to the prices.
0 Reply
Avatar
Niloy September 25, 2026 at 02:14 AM
26 ultra's camera is very disappointing my vivo x300 camera is better than Samsung.
+1 Reply
Avatar
paul September 26, 2026 at 11:55 AM
ur an idiot both phones were released the same year and thats samsungs fault for using outdated chips in modern phones so...cope
0 Reply