Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Oppo Find X9 Pro

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.9-inch Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on February 25, 2026, against the Oppo Find X9 Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9500 and came out 5 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • Delivers 55% higher peak brightness (2776 against 1795 nits)
  • The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
  • 12% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3939K versus 3508K)
  • 11% higher pixel density (500 vs 450 PPI)
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X9 Pro
  • Comes with 2500 mAh larger battery capacity: 7500 vs 5000 mAh
  • Shows 22% longer battery life (35:19 vs 28:50 hours)
  • Better camera quality (According to DxOMark rating)
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • Slow-motion recording at 480FPS
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • Supports higher wattage charging (80W versus 60W)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
  • Has a built-in infrared port

Review

Evaluation of Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Oppo Find X9 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
33.7
(Mediocre)
Value Index
42.0
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type Dynamic AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.9 inches 6.78 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3120 pixels 1264 x 2780 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
PPI 500 ppi 450 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1500 nits 1800 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 2600 nits 3600 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 240 Hz 240 Hz
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Armor 2 Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Screen-to-body ratio 91.4% 90%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space - 98.3%
PWM - 354 Hz
Response time - 7 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
2776 nits
1795 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 163.6 mm (6.44 inches) 161.26 mm (6.35 inches)
Width 78.1 mm (3.07 inches) 76.46 mm (3.01 inches)
Thickness 7.9 mm (0.31 inches) 8.25 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 214 g (7.55 oz) 224 g (7.9 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Silver, Blue, Pink, Purple White, Gray, Red
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3.82/5)
Drop resistance - Good (C) · 90 drops
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Oppo Find X9 Pro
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
Max clock 4740 MHz 4210 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
- 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro
- 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium
- 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra
L3 cache 8 MB 16 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon MediaTek NPU 990
GPU
Graphics Adreno 840 Mali-G1 Ultra MP12
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1716 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~5271.5 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Oppo Find X9 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
11049
10065
Compute Score (GPU)
28391
26944
Compute Score (GPU) 28391 26944
Single-core score 3624 3422
Multi-core score 11049 10065
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
3939244
3508681
CPU 1168602 1098383
GPU 1520337 1275843
Memory 448779 378116
UX 801526 756339
Total score 3939244 3508681
Samples [32 tests] [17 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
3009
Stability 67% 52%
Graphics test 20 FPS 22 FPS
Graphics score 2737 3009
3DMark Solar Bay
13319
Graphics test 46 FPS 51 FPS
Section 1 58 FPS 55 FPS
Section 2 42 FPS 52 FPS
Section 3 37 FPS 43 FPS
Graphics score 11990 13319
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Graphics test 42 FPS -
Graphics score 7123 -
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
21111
13143
Web score 23390 11183
Video editing 8217 5850
Photo editing 37389 22747
Data manipulation 18322 13395
Writing score 32854 19055
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (32nd and 51st place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-03 -> RennsportGeekbench 7 GPU16267
📘 2026-10-03 -> RennsportGeekbench 7 CPU3022 / 9141
📘 2026-09-23 (Raze)AnTuTu 123920421
📘 2026-09-19 (Niko)AnTuTu 123439980
📘 2026-09-18 (KEKRiLL)AnTuTu 124208433
Oppo Find X9 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-29 -> StevenSAnTuTu 123322691
📘 2026-09-25 (7kxlz)AnTuTu 123626063
📘 2026-07-26 -> FrostbyteXAnTuTu 113454088
📘 2026-07-14 (7kxlz)AnTuTu 113520797
📘 2026-05-23 (Valerij)AnTuTu 113562181

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz 5333 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM One UI 8.5 ColorOS 16
OS size 33.2 GB 58 GB
OS updates 7 years 5 years
Security updates 7 years 6 years

Battery

Capacity 5000 mAh 7500 mAh
Max charge power 60 W 80 W
Battery type Li-Ion Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (25 W) Yes (50 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes (84% in 30 min) Yes (54% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:43 hr 1:20 hr
Battery cycles - 1300 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 10:12 hr 19:04 hr
Watching video 21:39 hr 25:00 hr
Gaming 06:42 hr 10:24 hr
Standby 130 hr 107 hr
General battery life
28:50 hr
35:19 hr

Main camera

Matrix 200 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 16320 x 12240 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 5x Optical, 3x
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 240FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 480 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens 120° 120°
Lenses 1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Telephoto: 10 MP
4) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 200 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 200 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.4 f/1.5
Focal length 23 mm 23 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL S5KHP2 Sony LYT-828
Sensor size 1/1.3" (≈ 0.77 inch) 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch)
Pixel size 0.6 micron 1.22 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/2.9 f/2.1
Focal length 111 mm 70 mm
Sensor Sony IMX854 Samsung ISOCELL HP5
Sensor size 1/2.52" (≈ 0.4 inch) 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 0.5 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/2.0
Focal length 13 mm 15 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN3 Samsung S5KJN5
Sensor size 1/2.5" (≈ 0.4 inch) 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 165 180
Zoom 141 131
Samples Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra from DxOMark Photo samples of Oppo Find X9 Pro from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 12 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 4000 x 3000 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 23 mm 21 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL S5K3LU Samsung S5KJN5
Sensor size 1/3.2" (≈ 0.31 inch) 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 0.64 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port No Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 1 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
92 dB
86.4 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced February 2026 October 2025
Release date March 2026 October 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $1299 $1299
SAR (head) 1.28 W/kg -
SAR (body) 1.35 W/kg -
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 80 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the battery life is more important to you, then choose the Oppo Find X9 Pro. But if the display, software, and sound are more of a priority – go for the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
110 (35.4%)
201 (64.6%)
Total votes: 311

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
bbk electronics top March 24, 2026 at 01:30 PM
basically oppo wins in every aspect that actually matters.
+11 Reply
Avatar
ComputerNerd February 22, 2026 at 09:52 AM
Big advantages for the Oppo X9 Pro are the battery life, less motion blurr, and selfie camera photos. S26 Ultra has the marginally better CPU, special features, and easier access globally. Also, Samsung works with more cellular carriers globally.
+28 Reply