Home > Smartphone comparison > Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE vs Razr 60 – which one to choose?

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE vs Motorola Razr 60

71 out of 100
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
VS
59 out of 100
Motorola Razr 60
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
Motorola Razr 60

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.7-inch Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (with Exynos 2400) that was released on July 9, 2025, against the Motorola Razr 60, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 7400X and came out 3 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
  • 2.1x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1841K versus 886K)
  • Shows 7% longer battery life (16:34 vs 15:31 hours)
  • Delivers 21% higher peak brightness (1454 against 1198 nits)
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 2.2
  • 2.7x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2085 and 783 points
  • CPU with a higher amount of cores (+2)

Review

Evaluation of Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE and Motorola Razr 60 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 128 GB
VS
8 / 256 GB
31.6
(Mediocre)
Value Index
23.5
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
vs
Razr 60

Display

Type Dynamic AMOLED POLED
Size 6.7 inches 6.9 inches
Resolution 1080 x 2640 pixels 1080 x 2640 pixels
Aspect ratio 22:9 22:9
PPI 426 ppi 413 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1600 nits 1200 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 2600 nits 3000 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate - 300 Hz
Screen protection Gorilla Glass Victus 2 Gorilla Glass Victus
Screen-to-body ratio 85.4% 85%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Peak brightness test (auto)
Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE +21%
1454 nits
Razr 60
1198 nits

Design and build

Height 165.1 mm (6.5 inches) 171.3 mm (6.74 inches)
Width 71.9 mm (2.83 inches) 73.99 mm (2.91 inches)
Thickness 6.9 mm (0.27 inches) 7.25 mm (0.29 inches)
Weight 187 g (6.6 oz) 188 g (6.63 oz)
Waterproof IP48 IP48
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber -
Rear material Glass Eco-leather
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black Gray, Blue, Green
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-button Yes, in-button
Repairability Average (2.95/5) Good (3.63/5)
Drop resistance Very good (B) · 210 drops Average (D) · 70 drops
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE and Motorola Razr 60
SoC
Chipset Samsung Exynos 2400 MediaTek Dimensity 7400X
Max clock 3200 MHz 2600 MHz
CPU cores 10 (1 + 2 + 3 + 4) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 3 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 2 cores at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4		 - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A78
L3 cache 8 MB 4 MB
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 655
GPU
Graphics Xclipse 940 Mali-G615 MP2
GPU shading units 768 256
GPU clock 1095 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~3406.8 GFLOPS ~665.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE and Motorola Razr 60
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE +166%
2085
Razr 60
783
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE +154%
6507
Razr 60
2559
Compute Score (GPU)
Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE +384%
15403
Razr 60
3185
Compute Score (GPU) 15403 3185
Single-core score 2085 783
Multi-core score 6507 2559
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE +108%
1841283
Razr 60
886677
CPU 558771 343634
GPU 377597 156189
Memory 404155 134537
UX 500760 252317
Total score 1841283 886677
Samples Less than 3 Less than 3
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability - 98%
Graphics test - 3 FPS
Graphics score - 409
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 19413
Video editing - 8033
Photo editing - 32900
Data manipulation - 10903
Writing score - 19391
Submit your benchmark results

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory clock - 2133 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 2.2
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 15
ROM One UI 8.0 Hello UI
OS size 29.5 GB -
OS updates 7 years 3 years
Security updates 7 years 4 years

Battery

Capacity 4000 mAh 4500 mAh
Max charge power 25 W 30 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (15 W) Yes (15 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes -
Fast charging Yes (54% in 30 min) Yes (61% in 30 min)
Full charging time 1:29 hr 0:55 hr
Battery cycles 1700 cycles 1000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 06:11 hr 07:02 hr
Watching video 13:16 hr 11:44 hr
Gaming 04:15 hr 04:09 hr
Standby 67 hr 55 hr
General battery life
Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE +7%
16:34 hr
Razr 60
15:31 hr
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8160 x 6120 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) -
Angle of widest lens 123° 120°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 12 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 13 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.7
Focal length 23 mm 25 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL GN3 Samsung ISOCELL GN8
Sensor size 1/1.57" (≈ 0.64 inch) 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 0.8 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 12 MP 13 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 13 mm -
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL 3LU Sony IMX258
Sensor size 1/3.2" (≈ 0.31 inch) 1/3.0" (≈ 0.33 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 10 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 3648 x 2736 6528 x 4896
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.4
Focal length 23 mm 25 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL 3J1 OmniVision OV32B
Sensor size 1/3.0" (≈ 0.33 inch) 1/3.14" (≈ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size 1.22 micron 0.7 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 1 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby -
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced July 2025 April 2025
Release date July 2025 April 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $899 $799
SAR (head) 0.84 W/kg -
SAR (body) 1.54 W/kg -
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint		 - Hall-effect sensor
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Not included
Further details
Notes on Razr 60:
    - There is a version with two physical SIM cards and no eSIM.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
5 (50%)
5 (50%)
Total votes: 10

Related comparisons

1. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6
2. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7
3. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE vs Motorola Razr (2025)
4. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE vs Motorola Razr (2024)
Compare other phones (860+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский