Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 vs Motorola Razr (2025)
76
out of 100
VS
56
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.9-inch Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (with Exynos 2500) that was released on July 9, 2025, against the Motorola Razr (2025), which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 7400X and came out 3 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7
- 2.6x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2289K versus 877K)
- Shows 36% longer battery life (21:06 vs 15:31 hours)
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- Delivers 24% higher peak brightness (1481 against 1198 nits)
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 2.2
- 2.1x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2285 and 1064 points
- CPU with a higher amount of cores (+2)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | Dynamic AMOLED | POLED |
| Size | 6.9 inches | 6.9 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2520 pixels | 1080 x 2640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 21:9 | 22:9 |
| PPI | 397 ppi | 413 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1600 nits | 1200 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 2600 nits | 3000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | - | 300 Hz |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.7% | 85% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.7% | - |
| PWM | 240 Hz | - |
| Response time | 1 ms | - |
| Contrast | β Infinity | - |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 166.7 mm (6.56 inches) | 171.3 mm (6.74 inches) |
| Width | 75.2 mm (2.96 inches) | 73.99 mm (2.91 inches) |
| Thickness | 6.5 mm (0.26 inches) | 7.25 mm (0.29 inches) |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP48 | IP48 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | - |
| Rear material | Glass | Eco-leather |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green, Red | Gray, Blue, Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-button | Yes, in-button |
| Repairability | Average (2.96/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Very good (B) Β· 210 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 2500 | MediaTek Dimensity 7400X |
| Max clock | 3300 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| CPU cores | 10 (1 + 2 + 5 + 2) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 2 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 5 cores at 2.36 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 2 cores at 2.74 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 4 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | Xclipse 950 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| GPU shading units | 1024 | 256 |
| GPU clock | 999 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~4091.9 GFLOPS | ~665.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 18873 | 3119 |
| Single-core score | 2285 | 1064 |
| Multi-core score | 7874 | 2980 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 771016 | 349816 |
| GPU | 723824 | 142976 |
| Memory | 356421 | 163300 |
| UX | 438435 | 220918 |
| Total score | 2289696 | 877010 |
| Samples | [7 tests] | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 54% | 98% |
| Graphics test | 17 FPS | 3 FPS |
| Graphics score | 2231 | 409 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 36 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 43 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 35 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 29 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 9397 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 15720 | 19413 |
| Video editing | 8133 | 8033 |
| Photo editing | 32035 | 32900 |
| Data manipulation | 11954 | 10903 |
| Writing score | 22532 | 19391 |
Recent User Tests
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-05-16 -> INFC | AnTuTu 11 | 2220403 |
| π 2026-01-01 (Koss) | AnTuTu 11 | 2437711 |
| π 2025-12-19 (Yell) | AnTuTu 11 | 2112394 |
| π 2025-11-26 -> everviolet12 | Geekbench 6 GPU | 18873 |
| π 2025-11-26 -> everviolet12 | AnTuTu 11 | 2496663 |
Motorola Razr (2025)
No benchmark results yet
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | - | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| ROM | One UI 8.0 | Hello UI |
| OS size | 27 GB | - |
| OS updates | 7 years | 3 years |
| Security updates | 7 years | 4 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 4300 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Max charge power | 25 W | 30 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (15 W) | Yes (15 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | Yes | - |
| Fast charging | Yes (46% in 30 min) | Yes (61% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:31 hr | 0:55 hr |
| Battery cycles | 2000 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | 08:49 hr | 07:02 hr |
| Watching video | 15:58 hr | 11:44 hr |
| Gaming | 04:38 hr | 04:09 hr |
| Standby | 84 hr | 55 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8160 x 6120 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (1080p) | - |
| Angle of widest lens | 123Β° | 120Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL GN3 | Samsung ISOCELL GN8 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.57" (β 0.64 inch) | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 12 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 13 mm | - |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL 3LU | Sony IMX258 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.2" (β 0.31 inch) | 1/3.0" (β 0.33 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 10 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6528 x 4896 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL 3J1 | OmniVision OV32B |
| Sensor size | 1/3.0" (β 0.33 inch) | 1/3.14" (β 0.32 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.22 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | - |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | July 2025 | April 2025 |
| Release date | July 2025 | May 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1099 | $699 |
| Sensors | - Hall-effect sensor - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Hall-effect sensor - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Not included |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 22