Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Huawei Mate XT Ultimate

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 10-inch Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite) that was released on December 2, 2025, against the Huawei Mate XT Ultimate, which is powered by HiSilicon Kirin 9010 and came out 1 year and 3 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
  • Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
  • More energy-efficient CPU – Snapdragon 8 Elite
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • The phone is 1 year and 3 months newer
  • 2.1x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3018 and 1438 points
  • Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Huawei Mate XT Ultimate
  • 42% higher pixel density (381 vs 269 PPI)
  • The rear camera has a 5.5x optical zoom
  • Supports higher wattage charging (66W versus 45W)
  • Has a built-in infrared port

Review

Evaluation of Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Huawei Mate XT Ultimate crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
16 / 512 GB
VS
16 / 256 GB
8.7
(Bad)
Value Index
6.9
(Bad)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type Dynamic AMOLED OLED
Size 10 inches 10.2 inches
Resolution 1584 x 2160 pixels 2232 x 3184 pixels
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
PPI 269 ppi 381 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1600 nits 5000 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate - 240 Hz
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2 -
Screen-to-body ratio 90.9% 91.9%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming

Design and build

Height 159.2 mm (6.27 inches) 156.7 mm (6.17 inches)
Width 214.1 mm (8.43 inches) 219 mm (8.62 inches)
Thickness 3.9 mm (0.15 inches) 3.6 mm (0.14 inches)
Weight 309 g (10.9 oz) 298 g (10.51 oz)
Waterproof IP48 -
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black Black, Red
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-button Yes, in-button
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Huawei Mate XT Ultimate
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite HiSilicon Kirin 9010
Max clock 4470 MHz 2300 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
- 4 cores at 1.55 GHz: Cortex-A510
- 3 cores at 2.18 GHz: TaiShan V121
- 1 core at 2.3 GHz: TaiShan V121
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC SMIC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 7 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Da Vinci
GPU
Graphics Adreno 830 Maleoon 910
GPU shading units 1536 1024
GPU clock 1100 MHz 750 MHz
FLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS ~1536 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Huawei Mate XT Ultimate
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) - 1415
Single-core score 3018 1438
Multi-core score 9710 4365
Sources: Geekbench [3]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
CPU 803775 -
GPU 964888 -
Memory 494729 -
UX 663140 -
Total score 2926532 -
Samples Less than 3 Less than 3
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#124th place)

Memory

RAM
RAM size 16 GB 16 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz 4200 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 512 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 -
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 HarmonyOS 4.2
ROM One UI 8.0 -
OS updates 7 years 2 years
Security updates 7 years 3 years

Battery

Capacity 5600 mAh 5600 mAh
Max charge power 45 W 66 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (15 W) Yes (50 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes -
Fast charging Yes (50% in 30 min) Yes

Main camera

Matrix 200 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 16320 x 12240 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 5.5x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 120 FPS (1080p) -
Angle of widest lens 120° 12°
Lenses 1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 10 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 12 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 200 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.7 f/1.4
Focal length 24 mm 24 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL HP2 -
Sensor size 1/1.3" (≈ 0.77 inch) 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 0.6 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 10 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.4 f/3.4
Focal length 67 mm 125 mm
Sensor size 1/3.94" (≈ 0.25 inch) 1/3.6" (≈ 0.28 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron -
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 12 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 13 mm 13 mm
Sensor size 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch) 1/2.9" (≈ 0.34 inch)
Pixel size 1.4 micron -
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 10 megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution 3648 x 2736 -
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 18 mm -
Sensor size 1/3.0" (≈ 0.33 inch) 1/3.6" (≈ 0.28 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Autofocus No -
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Additional lens 10 MP, f/24, 1/3.0" -
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.2
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version - 3.1
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes, DP 1.2
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port No Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes -

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced December 2025 September 2024
Release date December 2025 September 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $2899 $2800
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 66 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
103 (68.7%)
47 (31.3%)
Total votes: 150

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!