Sony Xperia 1 VIII vs Oppo Find X9 Pro
87
out of 100
VS
94
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.5-inch Sony Xperia 1 VIII (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on May 13, 2026, against the Oppo Find X9 Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9500 and came out 7 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Sony Xperia 1 VIII
- Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 2048GB
- 10% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3842K versus 3508K)
- The phone is 7 months newer
- Weighs 24 grams less
- Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X9 Pro
- Comes with 2500 mAh larger battery capacity: 7500 vs 5000 mAh
- Delivers 28% higher peak brightness (1810 against 1417 nits)
- Supports higher wattage charging (80W versus 30W)
- The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- Slow-motion recording at 480FPS
- Has 2 SIM card slots
- 14% higher pixel density (450 vs 396 PPI)
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
- Has a built-in infrared port
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | OLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.5 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels | 1264 x 2780 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 396 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1500 nits | 1800 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 2200 nits | 3600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.5% | 90% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 97.5% | 98.3% |
| PWM | 240 Hz | 354 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 7 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | ∞ Infinity |
Screen space comparison
Find X9 Pro
6.78″ (20:9 ratio) = 17.2 in2
Xperia 1 VIII
6.5″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 16.1 in2
~7% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 162 mm (6.38 inches) | 161.26 mm (6.35 inches) |
| Width | 74 mm (2.91 inches) | 76.46 mm (3.01 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm (0.33 inches) | 8.25 mm (0.32 inches) |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 224 g (7.9 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Silver, Gold, Red | White, Gray, Red |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-button | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | - | Good (3.82/5) |
| Drop resistance | - | Good (C) · 90 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| Max clock | 4610 MHz | 4210 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance - 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime |
- 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro - 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium - 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 16 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | MediaTek NPU 990 |
| Graphics | Adreno 840 | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 1716 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS | ~5271.5 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 28578 | 26944 |
| Single-core score | 3522 | 3422 |
| Multi-core score | 9923 | 10065 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 1085245 | 1098383 |
| GPU | 1325452 | 1275843 |
| Memory | 568742 | 378116 |
| UX | 863443 | 756339 |
| Total score | 3842882 | 3508681 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [17 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 52% |
| Graphics test | - | 22 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 3009 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | - | 51 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 55 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 52 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 43 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 13319 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 11183 |
| Video editing | - | 5850 |
| Photo editing | - | 22747 |
| Data manipulation | - | 13395 |
| Writing score | - | 19055 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (27th and 39th place)
Recent User Tests
Sony Xperia 1 VIII
No benchmark results yet
Oppo Find X9 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-07-26 -> FrostbyteX | AnTuTu | 3454088 |
| 📘 2026-07-14 (7kxlz) | AnTuTu | 3520797 |
| 📘 2026-05-23 (Valerij) | AnTuTu | 3562181 |
| 📘 2026-05-23 (Awie97#) | AnTuTu | 3515251 |
| 📘 2026-04-29 (Alijka) | AnTuTu | 3473300 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 5300 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | No |
| Memory card max size | Up to 2048 GB | - |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| ROM | - | ColorOS 16 |
| OS size | 45 GB | 58 GB |
| OS updates | 4 years | 5 years |
| Security updates | 6 years | 6 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 5000 mAh | 7500 mAh |
| Max charge power | 30 W | 80 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (50% in 30 min) | Yes (54% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:25 hr | 1:20 hr |
| Battery cycles | - | 1300 cycles |
| Web browsing | - | 19:04 hr |
| Watching video | - | 25:00 hr |
| Gaming | - | 10:24 hr |
| Standby | - | 107 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#13th place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 48 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8000 x 6000 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 2.9x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 120FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 120 FPS (1080p) | 480 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | - | 120° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 48 MP 2) Telephoto: 48 MP 3) Ultrawide: 48 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 200 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.5 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX888 | Sony LYT-828 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.35" (≈ 0.74 inch) | 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 1.22 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 48 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.1 |
| Focal length | 70 mm | 70 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX 906 | Samsung ISOCELL HP5 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 0.5 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 16 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX906 | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | - | 180 |
| Zoom | - | 131 |
| Samples | - | Photo samples of Oppo Find X9 Pro from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 12 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX663 | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.9" (≈ 0.34 inch) | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.22 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | No | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | May 2026 | October 2025 |
| Release date | June 2026 | October 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | $1299 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 80 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Oppo Find X9 Pro. It has a better camera, battery life, and sound.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 7