Tecno Camon 40 vs Infinix GT 30 5G
56
out of 100
VS
62
out of 100
Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.78-inch Tecno Camon 40 (with MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate) that was released on March 3, 2025, against the Infinix GT 30 5G, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 7400 and came out 5 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Tecno Camon 40
- Optical image stabilization
- Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1024GB
- Water-resistant body (IP66 classification)
Reasons to consider the Infinix GT 30 5G
- 68% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (963K versus 575K)
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
- 12% higher pixel density (440 vs 393 PPI)
- More energy-efficient CPU – Dimensity 7400
- 46% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1061 and 726 points
- The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2436 pixels | 1224 x 2720 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 393 ppi | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 1300 nits | 1600 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | - | 4500 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | - | 240 Hz |
| Screen protection | Panda King Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.7% | 89.5% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Design and build
| Height | 164.1 mm (6.46 inches) | 163.7 mm (6.44 inches) |
| Width | 74.6 mm (2.94 inches) | 75.8 mm (2.98 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm (0.29 inches) | 7.99 mm (0.31 inches) |
| Weight | 177.2 g (6.25 oz) | 187 g (6.6 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP66 | IP64 |
| Advanced cooling | - | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | White, Gray, Blue, Green | White, Blue, Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 |
| Max clock | 2200 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 4 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
| L3 cache | - | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| GPU shading units | 64 | 256 |
| GPU clock | 1000 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~128 GFLOPS | ~665.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 1460 | 3069 |
| Single-core score | 726 | 1061 |
| Multi-core score | 1986 | 3185 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 220368 | 356733 |
| GPU | 47993 | 157115 |
| Memory | 148214 | 156620 |
| UX | 158538 | 292956 |
| Total score | 575113 | 963424 |
| Samples | [13 tests] | [18 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 97% | 98% |
| Graphics test | 1 FPS | 3 FPS |
| Graphics score | 146 | 430 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 10711 | 12644 |
| Video editing | 6289 | 6213 |
| Photo editing | 24286 | 38708 |
| Data manipulation | 6552 | 9333 |
| Writing score | 12715 | 19146 |
Recent User Tests
Tecno Camon 40
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-07 (Keoboris ezz) | AnTuTu 11 | 613830 |
| 📘 2026-07-13 (vbruh27) | AnTuTu 11 | 570340 |
| 📘 2026-05-26 (golam rabbi) | AnTuTu 11 | 623340 |
| 📘 2026-04-27 (Aldo) | AnTuTu 11 | 606119 |
| 📘 2026-04-25 -> 221133221133ilya | CPU Throttle | 93% |
Infinix GT 30 5G
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-23 (ArdanaReviewer) | AnTuTu 12 | 1015923 |
| 📘 2026-09-19 (xxaru) | AnTuTu 11 | 978469 |
| 📘 2026-09-19 -> JudeSYFM | AnTuTu 11 | 986696 |
| 📘 2026-09-17 (Marcos borsegui) | AnTuTu 12 | 1013086 |
| 📘 2026-09-15 (Joseph) | AnTuTu 12 | 1041460 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | - |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | No |
| Memory card max size | Up to 1024 GB | - |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| ROM | HIOS 15 | XOS 15 |
| OS updates | - | 2 years |
| Security updates | - | 3 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 5200 mAh | 5500 mAh |
| Max charge power | 45 W | 45 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (51% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full charging time | 1:05 hr | - |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 64 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8160 x 6144 | - |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Angle of widest lens | - | 111° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 64 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-700C | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) | 1/1.73" (≈ 0.58 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | - | 25 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | - |
Other
| Category | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | March 2025 | August 2025 |
| Release date | May 2025 | August 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $200 |
| Successor | - Tecno Camon 50 4G | - |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 45 W | Yes, 45 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Infinix GT 30 5G is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 10