Tecno Pova 8 Pro 5G vs Oppo Reno 16 F 5G

66 out of 100
Tecno Pova 8 Pro 5G
VS
70 out of 100
Oppo Reno 16 F 5G

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.78-inch Tecno Pova 8 Pro 5G (with MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate) that was released on August 13, 2026, against the Oppo Reno 16 F 5G, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy and came out 1 month before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Tecno Pova 8 Pro 5G
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Handles wireless charging up to 30W
  • 26% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (994K versus 789K)
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 16 F 5G
  • The rear camera has a 3.5x optical zoom
  • Expandable storage via MicroSD card
  • Supports higher wattage charging (80W versus 45W)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 3.1 versus UFS 2.2
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Tecno Pova 8 Pro 5G and Oppo Reno 16 F 5G crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
61.3
(Average)
Value Index
70.7
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.78 inches 6.57 inches
Resolution 1208 x 2644 pixels 1080 x 2372 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
PPI 429 ppi 397 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1600 nits 1400 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 4500 nits -
HDR support No No
Touch sampling rate - 240 Hz
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 7i Crystal Guardd
Screen-to-body ratio 89.9% 88%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Screen space comparison
Pova 8 Pro 5G
6.78″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 17.5 in2
Reno 16 F 5G
6.57″ (20:9 ratio) = 16.2 in2
~8% more screen space

Design and build

Height 162.48 mm (6.4 inches) 158.16 mm (6.23 inches)
Width 77.27 mm (3.04 inches) 74.93 mm (2.95 inches)
Thickness 7.39 mm (0.29 inches) 8.44 mm (0.33 inches)
Weight 189 g (6.67 oz) 195 g (6.88 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling - Vapor chamber
Rear material - Glass
Frame material Plastic Plastic
Colors White, Black, Green White, Purple
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio
89.9%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Tecno Pova 8 Pro 5G and Oppo Reno 16 F 5G
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy
Max clock 2600 MHz 2500 MHz
CPU cores 8 (4 + 4) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A78
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.5 GHz: Cortex-A78
L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 655 MediaTek APU 655
GPU
Graphics Mali-G615 MP2 Mali-G615 MP2
GPU shading units 256 256
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1047 MHz
FLOPS ~665.6 GFLOPS ~536.1 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Tecno Pova 8 Pro 5G and Oppo Reno 16 F 5G
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
1050
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
3200
Compute Score (GPU)
3034
Compute Score (GPU) 3034 2443
Single-core score 1050 1008
Multi-core score 3200 2891
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
994646
789658
CPU 352241 212573
GPU 169204 206226
Memory 185069 179540
UX 288132 191319
Total score 994646 789658
Samples Less than 3 Less than 3

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory clock 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 3.1
Memory card No MicroSD

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM HIOS 16 ColorOS 16
OS updates - 3 years
Security updates - 4 years

Battery

Capacity 6500 mAh 7000 mAh
Max charge power 45 W 80 W
Battery type Li-Po Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (30 W) No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging Yes No
Fast charging Yes (50% in 27 min) Yes (50% in 30 min)
Full charging time 1:07 hr 1:02 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital Optical, 3.5x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion - 240 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens - 116°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.8
Focal length - 26 mm
Sensor size 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) 1/2.0" (≈ 0.5 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution - 50 MP
Aperture - f/2.8
Focal length - 92 mm
Sensor size - 1/3.13" (≈ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size - 0.56 micron
Stabilization - Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture - f/2.2
Focal length - 16 mm
Sensor size - 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch)
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 13 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution - 8192 x 6144
Aperture - f/2.0
Focal length - 18 mm
Sensor - CMOS
Sensor size - 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch)
Pixel size - 0.61 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Depends on the region
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced August 2026 June 2026
Release date August 2026 July 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $480 $480
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 45 W -
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the camera and battery life are more important to you, then choose the Oppo Reno 16 F 5G. But if the design and sound are more of a priority – go for the Tecno Pova 8 Pro 5G.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
0 (0%)
1 (100%)
Total votes: 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!