Tecno Spark Slim vs Motorola Moto G67 Power
57
out of 100
VS
63
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.78-inch Tecno Spark Slim (with MediaTek Helio G200) that was released on September 2, 2025, against the Motorola Moto G67 Power, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 and came out 2 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Tecno Spark Slim
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- 13% higher pixel density (440 vs 391 PPI)
- AMOLED display (versus competitor's IPS LCD)
- Supports higher wattage charging (45W versus 30W)
- Reverse charging feature
- Weighs 54 grams less
- Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Motorola Moto G67 Power
- Comes with 1840 mAh larger battery capacity: 7000 vs 5160 mAh
- 43% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (848K versus 591K)
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- More energy-efficient CPU – Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
- 42% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1021 and 718 points
- Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
- The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.78 inches | 6.7 inches |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2720 pixels | 1080 x 2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 440 ppi | 391 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 4500 nits | 1050 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.1% | 85.2% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 |
Design and build
| Height | 164.2 mm (6.46 inches) | 166.23 mm (6.54 inches) |
| Width | 75.9 mm (2.99 inches) | 76.5 mm (3.01 inches) |
| Thickness | 5.93 mm (0.23 inches) | 8.6 mm (0.34 inches) |
| Weight | 156 g (5.5 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP64 | IP64 |
| Rear material | - | Eco-leather |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | White, Black | Blue, Green, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G200 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 |
| Max clock | 2200 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
- 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Adreno 710 |
| GPU shading units | 64 | 256 |
| GPU clock | 1100 MHz | 940 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~140.8 GFLOPS | ~481.3 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 1480 | - |
| Single-core score | 718 | 1021 |
| Multi-core score | 1985 | 2988 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 220476 | 324416 |
| GPU | 48665 | 133504 |
| Memory | 149900 | 145758 |
| UX | 172511 | 244684 |
| Total score | 591552 | 848362 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [2 tests] |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 10809 | 16867 |
| Video editing | 6392 | 8358 |
| Photo editing | 24311 | 34309 |
| Data manipulation | 6221 | 10692 |
| Writing score | 12529 | 14748 |
Recent User Tests
Tecno Spark Slim
No benchmark results yet
Motorola Moto G67 Power
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-07-17 (Solo) | AnTuTu 11 | 848362 |
| 📘 2026-07-16 (PacmaceYT) | AnTuTu 11 | 812894 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | HIOS 15 | Hello UI |
| OS updates | - | 1 year |
| Security updates | - | 3 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 5160 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 45 W | 30 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (52% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full charging time | 0:57 hr | - |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8160 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | - | 120 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | - | 118° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | - | 25 mm |
| Sensor | - | Sony LYT-600 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Image resolution | - | 8 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | - | 12 mm |
| Sensor size | - | 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 1.12 micron |
| Stabilization | - | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 13 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Aperture | - | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Pixel size | - | 0.7 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Depends on the region |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | Yes |
| FM radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | September 2025 | November 2025 |
| Release date | October 2025 | November 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $190 | $180 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 45 W | - |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Motorola Moto G67 Power is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 1