Vivo iQOO 15 vs iQOO 13

93 out of 100
Vivo iQOO 15
VS
85 out of 100
Vivo iQOO 13

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.85-inch Vivo iQOO 15 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on October 20, 2025, against the Vivo iQOO 13, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and came out 11 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO 15
  • Shows 29% longer battery life (39:26 vs 30:28 hours)
  • Delivers 63% higher peak brightness (2928 against 1798 nits)
  • Handles wireless charging up to 40W
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
  • Comes with 850 mAh larger battery capacity: 7000 vs 6150 mAh
  • 25% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3950K versus 3150K)
  • The phone is 11 months newer
  • Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO 13
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 100W)

Review

Evaluation of Vivo iQOO 15 and iQOO 13 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
89*
78*
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
100
88
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
93*
85*
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
63.4
(Average)
Value Index
60.5
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.85 inches 6.82 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3168 pixels 1440 x 3168 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 508 ppi 510 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-144 Hz)
Max rated brightness 2600 nits 1800 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 6000 nits 4500 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate - 360 Hz
Screen protection Tempered glass Schott Xensation Alpha
Screen-to-body ratio 90.2% 89.6%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 100% -
PWM 561 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Peak brightness test (auto)
iQOO 15 +63%
2928 nits
1798 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 163.65 mm (6.44 inches) 163.37 mm (6.43 inches)
Width 76.8 mm (3.02 inches) 76.71 mm (3.02 inches)
Thickness 8.1 mm (0.32 inches) 8.13 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 220 g (7.76 oz) 213 g (7.51 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Blue White, Black, Silver, Green
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio
iQOO 15 +1%
90.2%
89.6%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo iQOO 15 and Vivo iQOO 13
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Max clock 4610 MHz 4320 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
L3 cache 12 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 840 Adreno 830
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo iQOO 15 and Vivo iQOO 13
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
iQOO 15 +19%
3584
3008
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
iQOO 15 +20%
11143
9297
Compute Score (GPU)
iQOO 15 +10%
27247
24763
Compute Score (GPU) 27247 24763
Single-core score 3584 3008
Multi-core score 11143 9297
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
iQOO 15 +25%
3950082
3150555
CPU 1112833 903944
GPU 1494722 1153744
Memory 442350 415491
UX 900177 677376
Total score 3950082 3150555
Samples [24 tests] [33 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
iQOO 15 +12%
2806
2509
Stability 54% 77%
Graphics test 21 FPS 19 FPS
Graphics score 2806 2509
3DMark Solar Bay
iQOO 15 +6%
12156
11463
Graphics test 46 FPS 44 FPS
Section 1 52 FPS 49 FPS
Section 2 46 FPS 44 FPS
Section 3 40 FPS 37 FPS
Graphics score 12156 11463
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
iQOO 15 +8%
6752
6250
Graphics test 40 FPS 37 FPS
Graphics score 6752 6250
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
iQOO 15 +8%
16959
15763
Web score 14169 14234
Video editing 6652 6801
Photo editing 35337 39527
Data manipulation 14682 13253
Writing score 29367 20704
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (30th and 83rd place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo iQOO 15
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-11 (Rtesh)AnTuTu 113886893
📘 2026-09-10 (Ranit)AnTuTu 113974227
📘 2026-08-07 (tt:shikazik)AnTuTu 114017492
📘 2026-07-17 (Skarvinarn)AnTuTu 113902163
📘 2026-07-03 (cA27)AnTuTu 114140036
Vivo iQOO 13
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-25 (Asuna)AnTuTu 113203192
📘 2026-09-24 (Fenix)AnTuTu 123343403
📘 2026-08-15 (Kh)AnTuTu 113166164
📘 2026-08-03 (ShiNo_Maebure)AnTuTu 113090760
📘 2026-07-08 (Edward)AnTuTu 113239284

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM OriginOS 6 Funtouch 16
OS size 57 GB -
OS updates 5 years 4 years
Security updates 7 years 5 years

Battery

Capacity 7000 mAh 6150 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 120 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (40 W) No
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) No
Bypass charging Yes No
Fast charging Yes (60% in 30 min) Yes (91% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:52 hr 0:32 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 18:52 hr 14:22 hr
Watching video 27:27 hr 17:57 hr
Gaming 09:04 hr 08:12 hr
Standby 147 hr 129 hr
General battery life
iQOO 15 +29%
39:26 hr
30:28 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 2x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 960 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 107° 119°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.9
Focal length 23 mm 23 mm
Sensor Sony IMX921 Sony IMX921
Sensor size 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.7 f/1.9
Focal length 85 mm 50 mm
Sensor Sony IMX882 Sony IMX816
Sensor size 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) 1/2.51" (≈ 0.4 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.1 f/2.0
Focal length 15 mm 15 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Samsung S5KJN1
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 6528 x 4896 6528 x 4896
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 21 mm 28 mm
Sensor GalaxyCore GC32E1 GalaxyCore GC32E1
Sensor size 1/3.1" (≈ 0.32 inch) 1/3.1" (≈ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 0.7 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No No
Speakers test
Max loudness
84.1 dB
n/a

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced October 2025 October 2024
Release date October 2025 November 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $699 $650
Successor - - Vivo iQOO 15
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 100 W Yes, 120 W
Further details
Notes on iQOO 13:
    - Only the 16/512 GB variant has UFS 4.1 storage; the rest use UFS 4.0.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo iQOO 15 is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
221 (79.8%)
56 (20.2%)
Total votes: 277

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!