Home > Smartphone comparison > iQOO Z11 Turbo vs Reno 15 – which one to choose?

Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo vs Oppo Reno 15

86 out of 100
Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo
VS
75 out of 100
Oppo Reno 15
Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo
Oppo Reno 15

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.59-inch Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5) that was released on January 15, 2026, against the Oppo Reno 15, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 and came out 1 month before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo
  • 2.2x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3068K versus 1394K)
  • Comes with 1100 mAh larger battery capacity: 7600 vs 6500 mAh
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • Slow-motion recording at 240FPS
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 80W)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 3.1
  • 2.2x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2732 and 1270 points
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 15
  • The rear camera has a 3.5x optical zoom
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo and Oppo Reno 15 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 256 GB
102.5
(Excellent)
Value Index
58.3
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
iQOO Z11 Turbo
vs
Reno 15

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.59 inches 6.59 inches
Resolution 1260 x 2750 pixels 1256 x 2760 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
PPI 466 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 2000 nits 600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 5500 nits 1200 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 360 Hz -
Screen protection Tempered glass Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Screen-to-body ratio 90.8% 88.5%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Peak brightness test (auto)
iQOO Z11 Turbo
n/a
Reno 15
1312 nits

Design and build

Height 157.61 mm (6.21 inches) 158.3 mm (6.23 inches)
Width 74.42 mm (2.93 inches) 74.83 mm (2.95 inches)
Thickness 7.9 mm (0.31 inches) 7.77 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 202 g (7.13 oz) 197 g (6.95 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Blue, Pink White, Blue
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio
iQOO Z11 Turbo +3%
90.8%
Reno 15
88.5%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo and Oppo Reno 15
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
Max clock 3800 MHz 2800 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 4 + 3)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.32 GHz: Oryon Performance
- 2 cores at 3.8 GHz: Oryon Prime		 - 3 cores at 1.84 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-520)
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-720)
- 1 core at 2.8 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-720)
L3 cache 6 MB 3 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Yes
GPU
Graphics Adreno 829 Adreno 722
GPU shading units 1024 512
GPU clock 1225 MHz 1150 MHz
FLOPS ~2508.8 GFLOPS ~1177.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo and Oppo Reno 15
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
iQOO Z11 Turbo +115%
2732
Reno 15
1270
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
iQOO Z11 Turbo +122%
9106
Reno 15
4106
Compute Score (GPU)
iQOO Z11 Turbo +174%
21211
Reno 15
7750
Compute Score (GPU) 21211 7750
Single-core score 2732 1270
Multi-core score 9106 4106
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
iQOO Z11 Turbo +120%
3068959
Reno 15
1394716
CPU 926038 481018
GPU 1050943 327987
Memory 404976 249030
UX 687002 336681
Total score 3068959 1394716
Samples [16 tests] Less than 3
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Graphics test 14 FPS -
Graphics score 1823 -
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 35 FPS -
Section 1 40 FPS -
Section 2 35 FPS -
Section 3 29 FPS -
Graphics score 9094 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 18849 -
Video editing 7194 -
Photo editing 40238 -
Data manipulation 15237 -
Writing score 25119 -
Submit your benchmark results

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-02 -> Vivo IqooAnTuTu3154986
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-06 (Π‘ΡƒΠ±Π°)AnTuTu3135649
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-02 -> paco_ratertaAnTuTu3075422
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-29 (Dior)AnTuTu2867447
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-21 -> paco_ratertaGeekBench CPU2732 / 9106
Add View all (17)
Oppo Reno 15
No benchmark results yet
Add

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 3.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM OriginOS 6 ColorOS 16
OS updates 5 years -
Security updates 5 years -

Battery

Capacity 7600 mAh 6500 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 80 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes (50% in 27 min) Yes (68% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:56 hr 0:57 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing - 11:50 hr
Watching video - 17:46 hr
Gaming - 06:35 hr
Standby - 139 hr
General battery life
iQOO Z11 Turbo
n/a
Reno 15
29:05 hr
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 200 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 16320 x 12240 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital (lossless), 4x Optical, 3.5x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 120 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 119Β° 116Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support		 - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 200 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.8
Focal length 23 mm 26 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL S5KHP5 Sony LYT-600
Sensor size 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch) 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 0.8 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution - 50 MP
Aperture - f/2.8
Focal length - 85 mm
Sensor - Samsung ISOCELL JN5
Sensor size - 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size - 0.64 micron
Stabilization - Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length - 15 mm
Sensor - OmniVision OV08D
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size - 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 6528 x 4896 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length - 18 mm
Sensor GalaxyCore GC32E1 Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN5
Sensor size 1/3.1" (β‰ˆ 0.32 inch) 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 0.64 micron
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Depends on the region
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No No

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced January 2026 January 2026
Release date January 2026 January 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $469 $549
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint		 - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 100 W Yes, 80 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
9 (81.8%)
2 (18.2%)
Total votes: 11

Related comparisons

1. Oppo Reno 15 vs Vivo V60
2. Oppo Reno 15 vs Oppo Reno 15 Pro
3. Oppo Reno 15 vs Vivo V50 5G
4. Oppo Reno 15 vs Oppo Reno 14 (6)
5. Oppo Reno 15 vs OnePlus Nord 5
6. Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo vs OnePlus Ace 6T (5)
7. Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo vs Vivo iQOO 15R (3)
8. Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
9. Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo vs Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 Max
10. Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China)
Compare other phones (860+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский