Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
86
out of 100
VS
70
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.59-inch Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5) that was released on January 15, 2026, against the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate and came out 1 month after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo
- 3.2x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3068K versus 971K)
- Comes with 1450 mAh larger battery capacity: 7600 vs 6150 mAh
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 45W)
- Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 2.2
- 2.6x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2732 and 1035 points
Reasons to consider the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- Weighs 24 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.59 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2750 pixels | 1208 x 2644 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | 466 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 2000 nits | - |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 5500 nits | - |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10 |
| Touch sampling rate | 360 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 90.3% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 157.61 mm (6.21 inches) | 162.4 mm (6.39 inches) |
| Width | 74.42 mm (2.93 inches) | 77 mm (3.03 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm (0.31 inches) | 7.4 mm (0.29 inches) |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | - |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | White, Black, Blue, Pink | Black, Blue, Orange |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate |
| Max clock | 3800 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 3.32 GHz: Oryon Performance - 2 cores at 3.8 GHz: Oryon Prime |
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 4 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | Adreno 829 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| GPU shading units | 1024 | 256 |
| GPU clock | 1225 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~2508.8 GFLOPS | ~665.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 21211 | - |
| Single-core score | 2732 | 1035 |
| Multi-core score | 9106 | 2980 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 926038 | 359514 |
| GPU | 1050943 | 156774 |
| Memory | 404976 | 184436 |
| UX | 687002 | 270357 |
| Total score | 3068959 | 971081 |
| Samples | [16 tests] | [3 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Graphics test | 14 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 1823 | - |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 35 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 40 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 35 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 29 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 9094 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 18849 | - |
| Video editing | 7194 | - |
| Photo editing | 40238 | - |
| Data manipulation | 15237 | - |
| Writing score | 25119 | - |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#96th place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-05 -> paco_raterta | AnTuTu 12 | 3113255 |
| π 2026-08-02 -> Vivo Iqoo | AnTuTu 11 | 3154986 |
| π 2026-07-06 (ΠΡΠ±Π°) | AnTuTu 11 | 3135649 |
| π 2026-07-02 -> paco_raterta | AnTuTu 11 | 3075422 |
| π 2026-06-29 (Dior) | AnTuTu 11 | 2867447 |
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-13 (Ben) | AnTuTu 12 | 990046 |
| π 2026-09-11 -> Lyshwin | AnTuTu 12 | 1064810 |
| π 2026-09-10 (Ivry) | AnTuTu 11 | 949836 |
| π 2026-09-01 (Ko) | AnTuTu 11 | 896448 |
| π 2026-08-01 (ekiz) | AnTuTu 11 | 968989 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 5300 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| ROM | OriginOS 6 | HIOS 16 |
| OS updates | 5 years | 3 years |
| Security updates | 5 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 7600 mAh | 6150 mAh |
| Max charge power | 100 W | 45 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Bypass charging | Yes | - |
| Fast charging | Yes (50% in 27 min) | Yes (42% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:56 hr | 1:20 hr |
| Web browsing | - | 11:44 hr |
| Watching video | - | 21:09 hr |
| Gaming | - | 06:57 hr |
| Standby | - | 100 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#100th place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 16320 x 12240 | 8160 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Digital (lossless), 4x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (1080p) | - |
| Angle of widest lens | 119Β° | 112Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 200 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL S5KHP5 | Sony LYT-700C |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | - | 50 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | - | 70 mm |
| Sensor size | - | 1/2.88" (β 0.35 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 0.61 micron |
| Stabilization | - | Digital |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | - | 14 mm |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 1.12 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | - | 155 |
| Zoom | - | 125 |
| Samples | - | Photo samples of Tecno Camon 50 Ultra from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6528 x 4896 | 8160 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | - | 21 mm |
| Sensor | GalaxyCore GC32E1 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1" (β 0.32 inch) | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | January 2026 | March 2026 |
| Release date | January 2026 | March 2026 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $469 | - |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 100 W | Yes, 45 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 5