Vivo v60e vs iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro
65
out of 100
VS
77
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.77-inch Vivo v60e (with Mediatek Dimensity 7360 Turbo) that was released on October 7, 2025, against the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 and came out 5 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo v60e
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- Weighs 16 grams less
- The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro
- 2.8x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2391K versus 859K)
- Higher display refresh rate β 144 Hz
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
- Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 90W)
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- 17% higher pixel density (453 vs 388 PPI)
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 2.2
- 2.1x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2195 and 1029 points
- Reverse charging feature
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.77 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels | 1260 x 2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 388 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 1600 nits | 2000 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 5000 nits | 4400 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Screen protection | Diamond Shield Glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.9% | 89.3% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Design and build
| Height | 163.5 mm (6.44 inches) | 163.72 mm (6.45 inches) |
| Width | 77 mm (3.03 inches) | 75.88 mm (2.99 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm (0.3 inches) | 8.09 mm (0.32 inches) |
| Weight | 190 g (6.7 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP65 |
| Advanced cooling | - | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Plastic | - |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | Gold, Purple | White, Black, Gold, Orange |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7360 Turbo | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 |
| Max clock | 2500 MHz | 3210 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 2 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A715 |
- 2 cores at 2.02 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek APU 657 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G615 MP2 | Adreno 825 |
| GPU shading units | - | 1024 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~665.6 GFLOPS | ~2355.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 2507 | 19064 |
| Single-core score | 1029 | 2195 |
| Multi-core score | 2906 | 7107 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 333745 | 699508 |
| GPU | 127093 | 840348 |
| Memory | 136246 | 334664 |
| UX | 262779 | 516644 |
| Total score | 859863 | 2391144 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [52 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 38% |
| Graphics test | - | 13 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 1811 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | - | 29 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 34 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 29 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 25 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 7641 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 10048 |
| Video editing | - | 6057 |
| Photo editing | - | 24879 |
| Data manipulation | - | 10200 |
| Writing score | - | 13775 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#170th place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo v60e
No benchmark results yet
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-10-01 (Yorik) | AnTuTu 11 | 2477638 |
| π 2026-08-13 (Jit) | AnTuTu 11 | 2418217 |
| π 2026-07-11 (son im crine) | AnTuTu 11 | 2411737 |
| π 2026-07-07 (son im crine) | AnTuTu 11 | 2355809 |
| π 2026-06-07 -> NDuck | AnTuTu 11 | 2442579 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| ROM | Funtouch OS 15 | OriginOS 5 |
| OS updates | 3 years | - |
| Security updates | 3 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 6500 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 120 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | Yes |
| Bypass charging | - | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (50% in 21 min) | Yes (50% in 13 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:00 hr | 0:33 hr |
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Quad LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Angle of widest lens | 120Β° | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 200 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | - |
| Sensor | - | Sony LYT-600 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 0.7 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | - | GalaxyCore GC08A8 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/4" (β 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 1.12 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | - |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | 22 mm | - |
| Sensor | CMOS | GalaxyCore GC16B3C |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) | 1/3.1" (β 0.32 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | October 2025 | April 2025 |
| Release date | October 2025 | April 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $350 | $350 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 90 W | Yes, 120 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 1