Vivo X Fold6 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

89 out of 100
Vivo X Fold6
VS
81 out of 100
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 8.02-inch Vivo X Fold6 (with Mediatek Dimensity 9500 Super) that was released on June 26, 2026, against the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and came out 7 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X Fold6
  • Comes with 1400 mAh larger battery capacity: 7000 vs 5600 mAh
  • 59% higher pixel density (425 vs 268 PPI)
  • Waterproof body (IP58 classification)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (80W versus 45W)
  • 23% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3593K versus 2926K)
  • Better grip in hands – the body is 68.44 mm narrower
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
  • Has a 1.98 inches larger screen size
  • Has 33% more RAM: 16GB versus 12GB
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X Fold6 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
16 / 512 GB
15.6
(Bad)
Value Index
8.7
(Bad)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED Dynamic AMOLED
Size 8.02 inches 10 inches
Resolution 2312 x 2504 pixels 1584 x 2160 pixels
Aspect ratio 4:3.69 4:3
PPI 425 ppi 268 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes
Max rated brightness 500 nits 1600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 5000 nits -
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 240 Hz -
Screen protection - Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2
Screen-to-body ratio 90.3% 90.9%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Screen space comparison
Galaxy Z TriFold
10″ (4:3 ratio) = 48 in2
Vivo X Fold6
8.02″ (4:3.69 ratio) = 32.1 in2
~49% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)

Design and build

Height 157.16 mm (6.19 inches) 159.2 mm (6.27 inches)
Width 145.66 mm (5.73 inches) 214.1 mm (8.43 inches)
Thickness 4.4 mm (0.17 inches) 3.9 mm (0.15 inches)
Weight 228 g (8.04 oz) 309 g (10.9 oz)
Waterproof IP58 IP48
Rear material Plastic -
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Blue Black
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-button Yes, in-button
Screen-to-body ratio
90.3%
90.9%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X Fold6 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SoC
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 9500 Super Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Max clock 4210 MHz 4470 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro
- 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium
- 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
L3 cache 16 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 990 Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 Adreno 830
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1716 MHz 1200 MHz
FLOPS ~5271.5 GFLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X Fold6 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 26418 -
Single-core score 3288 3018
Multi-core score 9498 9710
Sources: Geekbench [3]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
3593349
CPU 972680 803775
GPU 1331646 964888
Memory 520511 494729
UX 768512 663140
Total score 3593349 2926532
Samples Less than 3 Less than 3
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#133rd place)

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 16 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock - 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 512 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 17 Android 16 (Can be upgraded to Android 17)
ROM OriginOS 7 Fold One UI 9.0
OS updates 5 years 7 years
Security updates 7 years 7 years

Battery

Capacity 7000 mAh 5600 mAh
Max charge power 80 W 45 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (40 W) Yes (15 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging No Yes
Fast charging Yes (62% in 30 min) Yes (50% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:59 hr -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 08:59 hr -
Watching video 19:58 hr -
Gaming 06:37 hr -
Standby 121 hr -
General battery life

Main camera

Matrix 200 megapixels 200 megapixels
Image resolution - 16320 x 12240
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 3x
Flash - LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording - Up to 30FPS
4K video recording - Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording - Up to 60FPS
Slow motion - 120 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens - 120°
Lenses 1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 10 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
Camera features - - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 200 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/1.7 f/1.7
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL HPB Samsung ISOCELL HP2
Sensor size 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) 1/1.3" (≈ 0.77 inch)
Pixel size 0.56 micron 0.6 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 10 MP
Aperture f/2.6 f/2.4
Focal length 70 mm 67 mm
Sensor Sony IMX885 -
Sensor size 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) 1/3.94" (≈ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 1 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.1 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm 13 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL JN1 -
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 1.4 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 20 megapixels 10 megapixels
Image resolution - 3648 x 2736
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.2
Focal length 21 mm 18 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV32D -
Sensor size 1/3.6" (≈ 0.28 inch) 1/3.0" (≈ 0.33 inch)
Pixel size 0.61 micron 1.12 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution - 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Additional lens 20 MP, OmniVision OV32D, f/21, 1/3.6" 10 MP, f/24, 1/3.0"
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 -
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No Yes

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced June 2026 December 2025
Release date July 2026 December 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $2199 $2899
Sensors - Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 80 W Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo X Fold6 is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!