Vivo X100 Ultra vs Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.78-inch Vivo X100 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3) that was released on May 13, 2024, against the Oppo Find X7 Ultra, which is powered by the same chip and came out 4 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo X100 Ultra
- Delivers 55% higher peak brightness (1814 against 1172 nits)
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X7 Ultra
- Shows 13% longer battery life (25:51 vs 22:58 hours)
- The rear camera has a 6x optical zoom
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 80W)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 inches | 6.82 inches |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels | 1440 x 3168 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 517 ppi | 510 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | - | 2600 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 3000 nits | 4500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.5% | 89.7% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | - | 97.9% |
| PWM | - | 91 Hz |
| Response time | - | 2 ms |
| Contrast | - | ∞ Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 164.1 mm (6.46 inches) | 164.3 mm (6.47 inches) |
| Width | 75.6 mm (2.98 inches) | 76.2 mm (3 inches) |
| Thickness | 9.2 mm (0.36 inches) | 9.5 mm (0.37 inches) |
| Weight | 229 g (8.08 oz) | 221 g (7.8 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP68 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Gray | Black, Blue, Brown |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Max clock | 3300 MHz | 3300 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) |
| Architecture | - 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 750 | Adreno 750 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 903-1000 MHz | 903-1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~2774 GFLOPS | ~2774 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 14403 | 14791 |
| Single-core score | 2119 | 2030 |
| Multi-core score | 6486 | 6160 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 695131 | 667687 |
| GPU | 685799 | 814281 |
| Memory | 402587 | 353947 |
| UX | 510585 | 566677 |
| Total score | 2294102 | 2402592 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [3 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 83% | 61% |
| Graphics test | 12 FPS | 12 FPS |
| Graphics score | 1642 | 1681 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Stability | - | 56% |
| Graphics test | 31 FPS | 32 FPS |
| Section 1 | 35 FPS | 36 FPS |
| Section 2 | 32 FPS | 33 FPS |
| Section 3 | 27 FPS | 28 FPS |
| Graphics score | 8230 | 8534 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | 76% | 57% |
| Graphics test | 28 FPS | 29 FPS |
| Graphics score | 4738 | 4895 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 10974 | 11514 |
| Video editing | 6450 | 6235 |
| Photo editing | 33109 | 31190 |
| Data manipulation | 12481 | 14496 |
| Writing score | 18970 | 19406 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (196th and 164th place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo X100 Ultra
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2025-01-12 (kyroskoh) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 14403 |
| 📘 2025-01-12 (kyroskoh) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2119 / 6486 |
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-03-26 (Vadim) | AnTuTu 11 | 2402592 |
| 📘 2026-02-02 (ice_angels) | AnTuTu 11 | 2411236 |
| 📘 2025-09-29 -> 310710Al | AnTuTu 11 | 2189333 |
| 📘 2024-07-23 (Nick) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 14791 |
| 📘 2024-07-23 (Nick) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2030 / 6160 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 4200 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 15) | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | OriginOS 5 | ColorOS 15 |
| OS updates | 3 years | 4 years |
| Security updates | 3 years | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 5500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 80 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (30 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes, (wireless) |
| Fast charging | Yes (65% in 30 min) | Yes (70% in 15 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:48 hr | 0:25 hr |
| Web browsing | 10:19 hr | 11:41 hr |
| Watching video | 14:26 hr | 17:53 hr |
| Gaming | 05:35 hr | 05:12 hr |
| Standby | 99 hr | 105 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#141st place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.7x | Optical, 6x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (1080p) | 480 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 116° | 123° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 200 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Telephoto: 50 MP 4) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-900 | Sony LYT-900 |
| Sensor size | 1/0.98" (≈ 1.02 inch) | 1/0" (≈ Infinity inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.6 micron | 1.6 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.7 | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | 85 mm | 65 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP9 | Sony IMX890 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.56 micron | 1 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 14 mm | 14 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-600 | Sony LYT-600 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.0" (≈ 0.5 inch) | 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | - | 85 |
| Preview | - | 79 |
| Zoom | - | 156 |
| Samples | - | Photo samples of Oppo Find X7 Ultra from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 6560 x 4928 |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | - | Sony LYT-506 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/2.74" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | - | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes, DP 1.4 |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | - |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | May 2024 | January 2024 |
| Release date | May 2024 | January 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $900 | $850 |
| Successor | - Vivo X200 Ultra | - Oppo Find X8 Ultra |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 80 W | Yes, 100 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Oppo Find X7 Ultra. It has a better battery life and software.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 645