Vivo X100 Ultra vs Oppo Find X7 Ultra

80 out of 100
Vivo X100 Ultra
VS
81 out of 100
Oppo Find X7 Ultra

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.78-inch Vivo X100 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3) that was released on May 13, 2024, against the Oppo Find X7 Ultra, which is powered by the same chip and came out 4 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X100 Ultra
  • Delivers 55% higher peak brightness (1814 against 1172 nits)
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X7 Ultra
  • Shows 13% longer battery life (25:51 vs 22:58 hours)
  • The rear camera has a 6x optical zoom
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 80W)

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X100 Ultra and Oppo Find X7 Ultra crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
40.6
(Average)
Value Index
34.6
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.78 inches 6.82 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3200 pixels 1440 x 3168 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 517 ppi 510 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes
Max rated brightness - 2600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3000 nits 4500 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz 240 Hz
Screen protection Tempered glass Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Screen-to-body ratio 89.5% 89.7%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space - 97.9%
PWM - 91 Hz
Response time - 2 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
X100 Ultra +55%
1814 nits
1172 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 164.1 mm (6.46 inches) 164.3 mm (6.47 inches)
Width 75.6 mm (2.98 inches) 76.2 mm (3 inches)
Thickness 9.2 mm (0.36 inches) 9.5 mm (0.37 inches)
Weight 229 g (8.08 oz) 221 g (7.8 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP68
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Gray Black, Blue, Brown
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X100 Ultra and Oppo Find X7 Ultra
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Max clock 3300 MHz 3300 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2)
Architecture - 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache 12 MB 12 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 750 Adreno 750
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 903-1000 MHz 903-1000 MHz
FLOPS ~2774 GFLOPS ~2774 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X100 Ultra and Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2119
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
6486
Compute Score (GPU)
14403
14791
Compute Score (GPU) 14403 14791
Single-core score 2119 2030
Multi-core score 6486 6160
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
2294102
2402592
CPU 695131 667687
GPU 685799 814281
Memory 402587 353947
UX 510585 566677
Total score 2294102 2402592
Samples Less than 3 [3 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
1642
1681
Stability 83% 61%
Graphics test 12 FPS 12 FPS
Graphics score 1642 1681
3DMark Solar Bay
8230
8534
Stability - 56%
Graphics test 31 FPS 32 FPS
Section 1 35 FPS 36 FPS
Section 2 32 FPS 33 FPS
Section 3 27 FPS 28 FPS
Graphics score 8230 8534
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
4738
4895
Stability 76% 57%
Graphics test 28 FPS 29 FPS
Graphics score 4738 4895
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
14201
14344
Web score 10974 11514
Video editing 6450 6235
Photo editing 33109 31190
Data manipulation 12481 14496
Writing score 18970 19406
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (196th and 164th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo X100 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2025-01-12 (kyroskoh)Geekbench 6 GPU14403
📘 2025-01-12 (kyroskoh)Geekbench 6 CPU2119 / 6486
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-03-26 (Vadim)AnTuTu 112402592
📘 2026-02-02 (ice_angels)AnTuTu 112411236
📘 2025-09-29 -> 310710AlAnTuTu 112189333
📘 2024-07-23 (Nick)Geekbench 6 GPU14791
📘 2024-07-23 (Nick)Geekbench 6 CPU2030 / 6160

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 4200 MHz 4266 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 15) Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM OriginOS 5 ColorOS 15
OS updates 3 years 4 years
Security updates 3 years 5 years

Battery

Capacity 5500 mAh 5000 mAh
Max charge power 80 W 100 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (30 W) Yes (50 W)
Reverse charging Yes Yes, (wireless)
Fast charging Yes (65% in 30 min) Yes (70% in 15 min)
Full charging time 0:48 hr 0:25 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 10:19 hr 11:41 hr
Watching video 14:26 hr 17:53 hr
Gaming 05:35 hr 05:12 hr
Standby 99 hr 105 hr
General battery life
22:58 hr
25:51 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3.7x Optical, 6x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) 480 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens 116° 123°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 200 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Telephoto: 50 MP
4) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.8
Focal length 23 mm 23 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-900 Sony LYT-900
Sensor size 1/0.98" (≈ 1.02 inch) 1/0" (≈ Infinity inch)
Pixel size 1.6 micron 1.6 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 200 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.7 f/2.6
Focal length 85 mm 65 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL HP9 Sony IMX890
Sensor size 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 0.56 micron 1 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 14 mm 14 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-600 Sony LYT-600
Sensor size 1/2.0" (≈ 0.5 inch) 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh - 85
Preview - 79
Zoom - 156
Samples - Photo samples of Oppo Find X7 Ultra from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 6560 x 4928
Aperture f/2.5 f/2.4
Focal length 24 mm 21 mm
Sensor - Sony LYT-506
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.74" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size - 0.8 micron
Autofocus - Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes, DP 1.4
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes -
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced May 2024 January 2024
Release date May 2024 January 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $900 $850
Successor - Vivo X200 Ultra - Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 80 W Yes, 100 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Oppo Find X7 Ultra. It has a better battery life and software.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
310 (48.1%)
335 (51.9%)
Total votes: 645

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Tai March 11, 2025 at 02:43 AM
You don't have money bro
+11 Reply