Vivo X100 vs Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.78-inch Vivo X100 (with MediaTek Dimensity 9300) that was released on November 13, 2023, against the Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos), which is powered by Exynos 2400 and came out 2 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo X100
- Has a 0.58 inch larger screen size
- Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 25W)
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
- 21% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2447K versus 2029K)
- Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- Has 2 SIM card slots
- Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
- Handles wireless charging up to 15W
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- CPU with a higher amount of cores (+2)
- Weighs 39 grams less
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 inches | 6.2 inches |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels | 1080 x 2340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | 453 ppi | 416 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (24-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 3000 nits | 2600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 90.9% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| RGB color space | - | 98.9% |
| PWM | - | 483 Hz |
| Response time | - | 1 ms |
| Contrast | - | ∞ Infinity |
Screen space comparison
Vivo X100
6.78″ (20:9 ratio) = 17.2 in2
Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
6.2″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 14.6 in2
~17% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 164.05 mm (6.46 inches) | 147 mm (5.79 inches) |
| Width | 75.19 mm (2.96 inches) | 70.6 mm (2.78 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.49 mm (0.33 inches) | 7.6 mm (0.3 inches) |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 167 g (5.89 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP68 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Blue, Red | Black, Gray, Blue, Green, Orange, Purple, Yellow |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | - | Good (3.23/5) |
| Drop resistance | - | Excellent (A) · 270 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
| Max clock | 3250 MHz | 3210 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 10 (1 + 2 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 3 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 2 cores at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 790 | Yes |
| Graphics | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Xclipse 940 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 1095 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS | ~3406.8 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 15081 | 16248 |
| Single-core score | 2186 | 2055 |
| Multi-core score | 7422 | 6402 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 740213 | 714085 |
| GPU | 789881 | 633949 |
| Memory | 362038 | 224924 |
| UX | 555582 | 456877 |
| Total score | 2447714 | 2029835 |
| Samples | [6 tests] | [30 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 50% | 67% |
| Graphics test | 14 FPS | 13 FPS |
| Graphics score | 1877 | 1769 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Stability | 53% | 61% |
| Graphics test | 29 FPS | 32 FPS |
| Section 1 | 32 FPS | 36 FPS |
| Section 2 | 30 FPS | 32 FPS |
| Section 3 | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| Graphics score | 7740 | 8314 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | 41% | 61% |
| Graphics test | 28 FPS | 21 FPS |
| Graphics score | 4700 | 3564 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 11741 | 16695 |
| Video editing | 5651 | 8032 |
| Photo editing | 28882 | 35055 |
| Data manipulation | 12096 | 14884 |
| Writing score | 22861 | 21619 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#141st place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo X100
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-08-29 (Bhumit) | AnTuTu | 2262755 |
| 📘 2026-08-08 (holu096) | GeekBench CPU | 2186 / 7422 |
| 📘 2026-08-08 (holu096) | AnTuTu | 2517701 |
| 📘 2026-06-17 (lnz) | GeekBench CPU | 2253 / 7347 |
| 📘 2026-06-17 (lnz) | AnTuTu | 2447714 |
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-07-29 (Ant) | GeekBench CPU | 2152 / 6936 |
| 📘 2026-07-29 (Ant) | AnTuTu | 2073670 |
| 📘 2026-07-28 (Ant) | GeekBench CPU | 2115 / 6826 |
| 📘 2026-07-21 (Rakson2468) | AnTuTu | 2056392 |
| 📘 2026-07-09 (Edward) | AnTuTu | 2067450 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 4200 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 15) | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | Funtouch 15 | One UI 8.0 |
| OS size | - | 24.1 GB |
| OS updates | 3 years | 4 years |
| Security updates | 3 years | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 120 W | 25 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes (15 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | - | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (50% in 11 min) | Yes (50% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:21 hr | 1:15 hr |
| Battery cycles | - | 2000 cycles |
| Web browsing | - | 06:54 hr |
| Watching video | - | 12:01 hr |
| Gaming | - | 03:59 hr |
| Standby | - | 108 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8160 x 6120 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | Up to 30FPS |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (1080p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 119° | 120° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 64 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 10 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | - | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX920 | Samsung ISOCELL GN3 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.49" (≈ 0.67 inch) | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.2 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 64 MP | 10 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 70 mm | 67 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV64B | Samsung ISOCELL S5K3K1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.0" (≈ 0.5 inch) | 1/3.94" (≈ 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 1 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Sony IMX564 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 1.4 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6528 x 4896 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KGD2 | Samsung S5K3LU |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/3.2" (≈ 0.31 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes, DP 1.2 |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | - |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | - | 20 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | - | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | November 2023 | January 2024 |
| Release date | November 2023 | January 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $569 | $799 |
| Successor | - Vivo X300 | - |
| SAR (head) | - | 0.87 W/kg |
| SAR (body) | - | 1.35 W/kg |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Hall-effect sensor - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 120 W | Not included |
Further details
Notes on Vivo X100:
- The top version with 16 GB of RAM comes with LPDDR5T memory type, while the others utilize LPDDR5X.
Notes on Galaxy S24 (Exynos):
- The 128 GB variant features UFS 3.1 memory, other models have UFS 4.0.
- There are two models: one with dual Nano SIM, and the other with 1 Nano SIM + eSIM.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the performance, gaming, and battery life are more important to you, then choose the Vivo X100. But if the connectivity, software, design, and sound are more of a priority – go for the Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos).
Cast your vote
Total votes: 75
Related comparisons
2.
Vivo X100 vs Vivo iQOO 12 (2)