Xiaomi 14 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 16

78 out of 100
Xiaomi 14 Pro
VS
92 out of 100
Vivo iQOO 16

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.73-inch Xiaomi 14 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3) that was released on October 26, 2023, against the Vivo iQOO 16, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 and came out 3 years after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 14 Pro
  • The rear camera has a 3.2x optical zoom
  • Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 100W)
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO 16
  • 2.3x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (5498K versus 2397K)
  • Comes with 3520 mAh larger battery capacity: 8400 vs 4880 mAh
  • Higher display refresh rate – 165 Hz
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • More recent OS version: Android 17 versus 16
  • More energy-efficient CPU – Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
  • 77% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3764 and 2129 points

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi 14 Pro and Vivo iQOO 16 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
87
97
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
80*
87*
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
80
98
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
68
99
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
71
99*
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
87
92
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
78*
92*
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

Should I update?
No 79% Yes
Yes, we think most users will notice the upgrade.
Updating from Xiaomi 14 Pro to Vivo iQOO 16 makes sense and should feel noticeably better in daily use.
Main improvements: gaming, battery life, and performance.

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.73 inches 6.85 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3200 pixels 1440 x 3168 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.8:9
PPI 522 ppi 508 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 3000 nits 2800 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR - 10000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 240 Hz 3300 Hz
Screen protection Xiaomi Longjing Glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 89.9% 90.6%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.5% -
PWM 120 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Peak brightness test (auto)
1054 nits
n/a
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 161.4 mm (6.35 inches) 163.75 mm (6.45 inches)
Width 75.3 mm (2.96 inches) 76.9 mm (3.03 inches)
Thickness 8.49 mm (0.33 inches) 8.4 mm (0.33 inches)
Weight 223 g (7.87 oz) 222.5 g (7.85 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Silver, Gray, Green White, Silver, Blue
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio
89.9%
iQOO 16 +1%
90.6%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi 14 Pro and Vivo iQOO 16
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
Max clock 3300 MHz 5010 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) 8 (2 + 3 + 3)
Architecture - 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 3 cores at 3.74 GHz:
- 3 cores at 4.03 GHz:
- 2 cores at 5.01 GHz:
L3 cache 12 MB -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 2 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 750 Adreno 850
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 903-1000 MHz 1450 MHz
FLOPS ~2774 GFLOPS ~4454.4 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi 14 Pro and Vivo iQOO 16
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2129
iQOO 16 +77%
3764
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
6906
iQOO 16 +68%
11619
Compute Score (GPU)
13963
iQOO 16 +119%
30624
Compute Score (GPU) 13963 30624
Single-core score 2129 3764
Multi-core score 6906 11619
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
2397671
iQOO 16 +129%
5498720
CPU 690713 1512400
GPU 829399 2045600
Memory 341008 738900
UX 536551 1201820
Total score 2397671 5498720
Samples [9 tests] Less than 3
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
1589
n/a
Stability 89% -
Graphics test 12 FPS -
Graphics score 1589 -
3DMark Solar Bay
8037
n/a
Stability 85% -
Graphics test 31 FPS -
Section 1 36 FPS -
Section 2 31 FPS -
Section 3 25 FPS -
Graphics score 8037 -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
4526
n/a
Stability 83% -
Graphics test 27 FPS -
Graphics score 4526 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
16058
n/a
Web score 14546 -
Video editing 7908 -
Photo editing 31773 -
Data manipulation 14905 -
Writing score 20028 -
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (169th and 2nd place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi 14 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-21 (Nipple Power)AnTuTu 112320631
📘 2026-08-08 (Shionnnfu)AnTuTu 112413075
📘 2026-08-05 (Sulaiman Samimi)AnTuTu 112304066
📘 2026-04-21 (DecayCat)Geekbench 6 CPU2127 / 6966
📘 2026-04-21 (DecayCat)AnTuTu 112433153
Vivo iQOO 16
No benchmark results yet

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 4200 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 17
ROM HyperOS 3 OriginOS 7
OS updates 4 years 5 years
Security updates 5 years 7 years

Battery

Capacity 4880 mAh 8400 mAh
Max charge power 120 W 100 W
Battery type Li-Po Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) Yes (40 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging - Yes
Fast charging Yes (50% in 8 min) Yes
Full charging time 0:18 hr -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 10:49 hr -
Watching video 16:30 hr -
Gaming 05:10 hr -
Standby 113 hr -
General battery life
25:21 hr
n/a

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3.2x Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 1920 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 115° 107°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.4 - 4.0 f/1.7
Focal length 23 mm -
Sensor Samsung Light Hunter 900 Omnivision OV50Q
Sensor size 1/1.31" (≈ 0.76 inch) 1/1.3" (≈ 0.77 inch)
Pixel size 1.2 micron -
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.7
Focal length 75 mm 85 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Sony LYT-600
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.8 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.1
Focal length 14 mm 15 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 GalaxyCore GC50D1
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.0" (≈ 0.5 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 6528 x 4896 6528 x 4896
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Focal length 22 mm 21 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV32B GalaxyCore GC32E1
Sensor size 1/3" (≈ 0.33 inch) 1/3.1" (≈ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 0.7 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes, DP 1.2 Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* 20 -
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
90.5 dB
n/a

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced October 2023 September 2026
Release date October 2023 September 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $1100 $999
Successor - Xiaomi 15 Pro -
Sensors - Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 120 W Yes, 100 W
Further details
Notes on 14 Pro:
    - New Longjing Glass is used. The frame can be either aluminum or titanium, with a weight difference of 7 grams.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo iQOO 16 is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Dilly October 1, 2026 at 11:32 AM
why nobody talking about wallpaper difference?
0 Reply