Xiaomi 17 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S25

91 out of 100
Xiaomi 17 Pro
VS
81 out of 100
Samsung Galaxy S25

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.3-inch Xiaomi 17 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on September 25, 2025, against the Samsung Galaxy S25, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and came out 8 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 17 Pro
  • Comes with 2300 mAh larger battery capacity: 6300 vs 4000 mAh
  • The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 25W)
  • Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
  • 22% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3569K versus 2920K)
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • 12% higher pixel density (464 vs 416 PPI)
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S25
  • Delivers 34% higher peak brightness (1393 against 1039 nits)
  • Weighs 30 grams less
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi 17 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S25 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
91*
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
91*
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 128 GB
38.6
(Mediocre)
Value Index
47.7
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type AMOLED Dynamic AMOLED
Size 6.3 inches 6.2 inches
Resolution 1220 x 2656 pixels 1080 x 2340 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
PPI 464 ppi 416 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1200 nits 2600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3500 nits -
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz 240 Hz
Screen protection Dragon Crystal Glass 3 Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Screen-to-body ratio 89.9% 91.1%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space 102.8% 97.4%
PWM 120 Hz 240 Hz
Response time 1 ms 2 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
1039 nits
Galaxy S25 +34%
1393 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 151.1 mm (5.95 inches) 146.9 mm (5.78 inches)
Width 71.8 mm (2.83 inches) 70.5 mm (2.78 inches)
Thickness 8 mm (0.31 inches) 7.2 mm (0.28 inches)
Weight 192 g (6.77 oz) 162 g (5.71 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP68
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Plastic Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Green, Purple Black, Silver, Gray, Blue, Green, Pink
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3.23/5)
Drop resistance - Excellent (A) · 270 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
89.9%
91.1%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi 17 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S25
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Max clock 4610 MHz 4470 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
L3 cache 12 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 840 Adreno 830
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi 17 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S25
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
17 Pro +29%
3871
3012
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
17 Pro +23%
12033
9766
Compute Score (GPU)
17 Pro +38%
27343
19829
Compute Score (GPU) 27343 19829
Single-core score 3871 3012
Multi-core score 12033 9766
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
17 Pro +22%
3569354
2920032
CPU 1004041 899843
GPU 1307517 1139434
Memory 470024 330975
UX 787772 549780
Total score 3569354 2920032
Samples [4 tests] [44 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
17 Pro +8%
2404
2216
Stability 81% 59%
Graphics test 18 FPS 16 FPS
Graphics score 2404 2216
3DMark Solar Bay
17 Pro +7%
10752
10045
Graphics test 41 FPS 38 FPS
Section 1 49 FPS 48 FPS
Section 2 41 FPS 37 FPS
Section 3 34 FPS 29 FPS
Graphics score 10752 10045
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
n/a
5664
Stability 71% 51%
Graphics test - 33 FPS
Graphics score - 5664
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
18486
20022
Web score 17802 21815
Video editing 8078 8619
Photo editing 37143 34466
Data manipulation 17701 17708
Writing score 24706 27109
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (40th and 116th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi 17 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-05-30 (Mmm.)AnTuTu 113569354
📘 2026-03-27 (Mm)AnTuTu 113433545
📘 2026-02-28 (aabdy)AnTuTu 113705564
📘 2026-01-09 (.)AnTuTu 113554073
📘 2025-12-13 -> JuubidaraGeekbench 6 CPU3860 / 12136
Samsung Galaxy S25
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-18 (S25 owner)AnTuTu 123476989
📘 2026-08-23 (S25 owner)AnTuTu 113149606
📘 2026-08-14 (Atharva0999)AnTuTu 113027002
📘 2026-08-04 (Abn)AnTuTu 112514474
📘 2026-07-08 (Plastyrrr)AnTuTu 112482132

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM HyperOS 3 One UI 8.0
OS size 54 GB 30.1 GB
OS updates 6 years 7 years
Security updates 6 years 7 years

Battery

Capacity 6300 mAh 4000 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 25 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) Yes (15 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes (70% in 30 min) Yes (56% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:47 hr 1:17 hr
Battery cycles - 2000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing - 09:09 hr
Watching video - 17:15 hr
Gaming - 05:32 hr
Standby - 108 hr
General battery life
n/a
24:10 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8160 x 6120
Zoom Optical, 5x Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 1920 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 102° 120°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 10 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.7 f/1.8
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Sensor Omnivision 950L LightHunter Samsung ISOCELL S5KGN3
Sensor size 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1.22 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 10 MP
Aperture f/3.0 f/2.4
Focal length 115 mm 67 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN5 Samsung ISOCELL S5K3K1
Sensor size 1/2.0" (≈ 0.5 inch) 1/3.94" (≈ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 1 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.2
Focal length 17 mm 13 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV50M Sony IMX564
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 1.4 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 12 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 4000 x 3000
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 21 mm 26 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV50M Samsung S5K3LU
Sensor size 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch) 1/3.2" (≈ 0.31 inch)
Pixel size 0.61 micron 1.12 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes, DP 1.2
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
85.6 dB
91.7 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced September 2025 January 2025
Release date September 2025 February 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $899 $799
Successor - - Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus (Snapdragon)
SAR (head) - 1.29 W/kg
SAR (body) - 1.36 W/kg
Sensors - Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 100 W Not included
Further details
Notes on Galaxy S25:
    - Supports up to 2 eSIMs. The international model has 2 physical SIM slots, while the U.S. model has 1.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi 17 Pro is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
36 (73.5%)
13 (26.5%)
Total votes: 49

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!