Xiaomi 17 Ultra vs Realme GT 8 Pro

93 out of 100
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
VS
92 out of 100
Realme GT 8 Pro

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.9-inch Xiaomi 17 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on December 25, 2025, against the Realme GT 8 Pro, which is powered by the same chip and came out 2 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 17 Ultra
  • The rear camera has a 4.3x optical zoom
  • Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
Reasons to consider the Realme GT 8 Pro
  • Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Shows 11% longer battery life (37:13 vs 33:23 hours)
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 90W)
  • 10% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4024K versus 3667K)
  • Delivers 9% higher peak brightness (4034 against 3687 nits)
  • 22% higher pixel density (508 vs 416 PPI)

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi 17 Ultra and Realme GT 8 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 512 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
29.9
(Mediocre)
Value Index
33.0
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type AMOLED OLED
Size 6.9 inches 6.79 inches
Resolution 1200 x 2608 pixels 1440 x 3136 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
PPI 416 ppi 508 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes
Max rated brightness 1200 nits 2000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3500 nits 7000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz -
Screen protection Xiaomi Shield Glass 3.0 60-120
Screen-to-body ratio 92.4% 91%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 100% -
PWM 121 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Peak brightness test (auto)
3687 nits
GT 8 Pro +9%
4034 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 162.9 mm (6.41 inches) 161.8 mm (6.37 inches)
Width 77.6 mm (3.06 inches) 76.87 mm (3.03 inches)
Thickness 8.29 mm (0.33 inches) 8.2 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 218.4 g (7.7 oz) 214 g (7.55 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material - Plastic
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Green, Purple White, Blue, Green
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Average (2.63/5) Good (3.24/5)
Drop resistance Excellent (A) · 270 drops Average (D) · 60 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
17 Ultra +2%
92.4%
91%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi 17 Ultra and Realme GT 8 Pro
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Max clock 4610 MHz 4600 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
- 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
L3 cache 12 MB 12 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 840 Adreno 840
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi 17 Ultra and Realme GT 8 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
3711
3711
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
17 Ultra +1%
11259
11175
Compute Score (GPU)
27219
GT 8 Pro +3%
28004
Compute Score (GPU) 27219 28004
Single-core score 3711 3711
Multi-core score 11259 11175
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
3667711
GT 8 Pro +10%
4024736
CPU 1064371 1129296
GPU 1296835 1516328
Memory 518366 465192
UX 788139 913920
Total score 3667711 4024736
Samples [7 tests] [14 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
2370
GT 8 Pro +27%
3001
Stability 81% -
Graphics test 18 FPS 22 FPS
Graphics score 2370 3001
3DMark Solar Bay
10845
GT 8 Pro +20%
12974
Graphics test 41 FPS 49 FPS
Section 1 46 FPS 57 FPS
Section 2 41 FPS 49 FPS
Section 3 36 FPS 42 FPS
Graphics score 10845 12974
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
18833
GT 8 Pro +39%
26260
Web score 16855 30905
Video editing 8052 7273
Photo editing 40273 69025
Data manipulation 15949 18371
Writing score 26073 43824
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (32nd and 15th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-13 (H1roshi)AnTuTu3530859
📘 2026-07-04 (...)AnTuTu3582442
📘 2026-06-26 (ALBAY)AnTuTu3913603
📘 2026-04-18 (UsusWarteg)AnTuTu3828672
📘 2026-03-17 (KosmosTer)AnTuTu3527804
Realme GT 8 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-18 (Mj.)AnTuTu4016269
📘 2026-08-03 (Gulhark)AnTuTu3957182
📘 2026-07-23 (Zergo)AnTuTu3898421
📘 2026-07-16 (Vladsmesh)AnTuTu4243822
📘 2026-05-14 (mrt)AnTuTu4379440

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 512 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM HyperOS 3 Realme UI 7.0
OS size 36 GB -
OS updates 6 years 4 years
Security updates 6 years 4 years

Battery

Capacity 6000 mAh 7000 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 120 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) Yes (50 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes (72% in 30 min) Yes (86% in 15 min)
Full charging time 0:50 hr 0:40 hr
Battery cycles 1000 cycles 1100 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 16:09 hr 16:17 hr
Watching video 22:41 hr 24:49 hr
Gaming 08:02 hr 08:34 hr
Standby 125 hr 157 hr
General battery life
33:23 hr
GT 8 Pro +11%
37:13 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 4.3x Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 1920 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 115° 112°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 200 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 200 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.67 f/1.9
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Sensor OmniVision OVX10500 -
Sensor size 1/1" (≈ 1 inch) 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1.6 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 200 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/2.4 - 3.0 f/2.6
Focal length 100 mm 65 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL HPE Samsung ISOCELL S5KHP5
Sensor size 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 0.56 micron 0.5 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 14 mm 16 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN5 OmniVision OV50D
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
170
n/a
Video quality
157
n/a
Generic main camera score
166
n/a
Bokeh 175 -
Zoom 169 -
Samples Photo samples of Xiaomi 17 Ultra from DxOMark -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 6528 x 4896
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.4
Focal length 21 mm 24 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV50M CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch) 1/3.1" (≈ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size 0.61 micron 0.7 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
84.7 dB
n/a

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced December 2025 October 2025
Release date March 2026 November 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $1199 $999
Sensors - Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 120 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the camera, connectivity, software, design, and sound are more important to you, then choose the Xiaomi 17 Ultra. But if the display, gaming, and battery life are more of a priority – go for the Realme GT 8 Pro.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
35 (29.4%)
84 (70.6%)
Total votes: 119

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!