Xiaomi 17T Pro vs Honor 600 Pro

92 out of 100
Xiaomi 17T Pro
VS
89 out of 100
Honor 600 Pro

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.83-inch Xiaomi 17T Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 9500) that was released on May 28, 2026, against the Honor 600 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and came out 1 month before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 17T Pro
  • Shows 23% longer battery life (36:42 vs 29:53 hours)
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
  • Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 80W)
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • 9% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3334 and 3058 points
Reasons to consider the Honor 600 Pro
  • Delivers 73% higher peak brightness (6060 against 3507 nits)
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • Weighs 19 grams less

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi 17T Pro and Honor 600 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
88*
88*
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
100
86
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
92*
89*
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
56.8
(Average)
Value Index
45.7
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.83 inches 6.57 inches
Resolution 1280 x 2772 pixels 1264 x 2728 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
PPI 447 ppi 458 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-144 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1100 nits 1800 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3500 nits 8000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz 360 Hz
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 7i Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 91.1% 90.9%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.7% -
PWM 120 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Screen space comparison
17T Pro
6.83β€³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 17.7 in2
600 Pro
6.57β€³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 16.4 in2
~8% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
3507 nits
600 Pro +73%
6060 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 162.2 mm (6.39 inches) 156 mm (6.14 inches)
Width 77.5 mm (3.05 inches) 74.7 mm (2.94 inches)
Thickness 8.25 mm (0.32 inches) 7.8 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 219 g (7.72 oz) 200 g (7.05 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Blue, Purple White, Black, Orange
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio
91.1%
90.9%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi 17T Pro and Honor 600 Pro
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9500 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Max clock 4210 MHz 4470 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro
- 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium
- 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
L3 cache 16 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 990 Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 Adreno 830
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1716 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS ~5271.5 GFLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi 17T Pro and Honor 600 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
17T Pro +9%
3334
3058
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
17T Pro +10%
10348
9377
Compute Score (GPU)
22721
600 Pro +6%
23977
Compute Score (GPU) 22721 23977
Single-core score 3334 3058
Multi-core score 10348 9377
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
17T Pro +9%
3323591
3038473
CPU 933780 968049
GPU 1300550 1129416
Memory 397001 325572
UX 692260 615436
Total score 3323591 3038473
Samples [25 tests] [3 tests]
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (61st and 106th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi 17T Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (hi)AnTuTu 123413066
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 (Zloto120)AnTuTu 123448034
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-22 (MΓ‘ximo)AnTuTu 123660205
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 (hi)AnTuTu 123291469
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-22 (Querty)AnTuTu 113415483
Honor 600 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (Peltsi)AnTuTu 123198303
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-31 (thor)AnTuTu 113101294
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (FuSi)AnTuTu 112975404
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-20 (JIUCH)AnTuTu 113104319
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-04 (Alexis)AnTuTu 113038473

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5333 MHz 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM HyperOS 3 MagicOS 10
OS size 35.4 GB -
OS updates 5 years 6 years
Security updates 6 years 6 years

Battery

Capacity 7000 mAh 7000 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 80 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) Yes (50 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging No Yes
Fast charging Yes (72% in 30 min) Yes (71% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:44 hr 0:48 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 18:30 hr 11:25 hr
Watching video 24:44 hr 19:55 hr
Gaming 09:34 hr 08:33 hr
Standby 131 hr 136 hr
General battery life
17T Pro +23%
36:42 hr
29:53 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 200 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 16384 x 12288
Zoom Optical, 5x Optical, 3.5x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 1920 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 120Β° 112Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/1.7 f/1.9
Focal length 23 mm -
Sensor Omnivision 950 LightHunter Samsung ISOCELL HP9
Sensor size 1/1.31" (β‰ˆ 0.76 inch) 1/1.4" (β‰ˆ 0.71 inch)
Pixel size 1.2 micron 0.56 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/3.0 f/2.8
Focal length 115 mm -
Sensor Samsung S5KJN5 -
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) -
Pixel size 0.64 micron -
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 12 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm -
Sensor OmniVision OV13B -
Sensor size 1/3.0" (β‰ˆ 0.33 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 6560 x 4928 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 21 mm -
Sensor Samsung S5KKD1 CMOS
Sensor size 1/3.42" (β‰ˆ 0.29 inch) -
Pixel size 0.64 micron -
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
83.6 dB
n/a

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced May 2026 April 2026
Release date May 2026 April 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $899 $999
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Face recognition sensor
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 80 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Xiaomi 17T Pro. It has a better gaming, battery life, and sound.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
237 (65.8%)
123 (34.2%)
Total votes: 360

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!