Xiaomi 18 Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 7.58-inch Xiaomi 18 Fold (with XRing O3) that was released on September 7, 2026, against the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and came out 1 year and 2 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 18 Fold
  • Comes with 1600 mAh larger battery capacity: 6000 vs 4400 mAh
  • 71% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (5228K versus 3065K)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • The rear camera has a 3.5x optical zoom
  • Waterproof body (IP59 classification)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (67W versus 25W)
  • The phone is 1 year and 2 months newer
  • More recent OS version: Android 17 versus 16
  • Better grip in hands – the body is 25.4 mm narrower
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
  • Has a 0.42 inch larger screen size
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi 18 Fold and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
23.9
(Mediocre)
Value Index
18.3
(Bad)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED Dynamic AMOLED
Size 7.58 inches 8 inches
Resolution 2364 x 1672 pixels 1968 x 2184 pixels
Aspect ratio 3:2 -
PPI 382 ppi 368 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness - 1300 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 4000 nits 2600 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Screen protection Xiaomi Dragon Crystal Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2
Screen-to-body ratio 88.7% 90%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space - 100%
PWM - 240 Hz
Response time - 1 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
n/a
1421 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 163.8 mm (6.45 inches) 158.4 mm (6.24 inches)
Width 117.8 mm (4.64 inches) 143.2 mm (5.64 inches)
Thickness 5.02 mm (0.2 inches) 4.2 mm (0.17 inches)
Weight 219 g (7.72 oz) 215 g (7.58 oz)
Waterproof IP59 IP48
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Silver, Gray, Red, Rose gold Black, Silver, Blue, Green
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-button Yes, in-button
Repairability - Average (2.97/5)
Drop resistance - Very good (B) Β· 210 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
88.7%
90%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi 18 Fold and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
SoC
Chipset XRing O3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Max clock 4350 MHz 4470 MHz
CPU cores 10 (2 + 4 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4 cores at 3.15 GHz: C1-Pro
- 4 cores at 3.68 GHz: C1-Premium
- 2 cores at 4.35 GHz: C1-Ultra
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
L3 cache 16 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Mali-G2 Ultra NX MP16 Adreno 830
GPU shading units 2048 1536
GPU clock 1600 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS ~6554 GFLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi 18 Fold and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
18 Fold +14%
3636
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
18 Fold +35%
13491
Compute Score (GPU)
18 Fold +80%
34901
Compute Score (GPU) 34901 19371
Single-core score 3636 3181
Multi-core score 13491 10029
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
18 Fold +71%
5228014
3065623
CPU 1359147 939230
GPU 2143582 1190171
Memory 941063 376287
UX 784222 559935
Total score 5228014 3065623
Samples Less than 3 [5 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability - 66%
Graphics test - 15 FPS
Graphics score - 2053
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test - 35 FPS
Section 1 - 43 FPS
Section 2 - 34 FPS
Section 3 - 28 FPS
Graphics score - 9285
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Graphics test - 29 FPS
Graphics score - 4885
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 17835
Video editing - 8623
Photo editing - 33817
Data manipulation - 13345
Writing score - 25306
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (2nd and 101st place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi 18 Fold
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 -> manvanconggggAnTuTu 124862080
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-21 -> SenzawaGeekbench 6 GPU19371
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-21 -> SenzawaGeekbench 6 CPU3056 / 9666
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-21 -> SenzawaAnTuTu 112995728
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-09 (RiF0706)Geekbench 6 CPU3181 / 10029
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-29 (SigmaPocoyo67)AnTuTu 113137252

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock - 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 17 Android 16
ROM HyperOS 4 One UI 8
OS size - 32.4 GB
OS updates - 7 years
Security updates - 7 years

Battery

Capacity 6000 mAh 4400 mAh
Max charge power 67 W 25 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) Yes (15 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes Yes (53% in 30 min)
Full charging time - 1:27 hr
Battery cycles - 2000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing - 06:57 hr
Watching video - 13:14 hr
Gaming - 05:48 hr
Standby - 114 hr
General battery life
n/a
21:26 hr

Main camera

Matrix 200 megapixels 200 megapixels
Image resolution - 16320 x 12240
Zoom Optical, 3.5x Optical, 3x
Flash - LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording - Up to 30FPS
4K video recording - Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording - Up to 240FPS
Slow motion - 960 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens - 120Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 10 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
Camera features - - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 200 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/1.7 f/1.7
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL HP5 Samsung ISOCELL HP2
Sensor size 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch) 1/1.3" (β‰ˆ 0.77 inch)
Pixel size 0.5 micron 0.6 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 10 MP
Aperture f/2.8 f/2.4
Focal length 80 mm 67 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN5 Samsung S5K3K1
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/3.94" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 1 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.2
Focal length - 13 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV50M Sony IMX564
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/2.55" (β‰ˆ 0.39 inch)
Pixel size 0.61 micron 1.4 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Image resolution - 3648 x 2736
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 21 mm 23 mm
Sensor - Sony IMX374
Sensor size - 1/3.0" (β‰ˆ 0.33 inch)
Pixel size - 1.12 micron
Autofocus - No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution - 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Additional lens 16 MP, f/21 10 MP, Sony IMX374, f/23, 1/3.0"
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
n/a
89.5 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced September 2026 July 2025
Release date September 2026 July 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $1640 $1999
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 67 W Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi 18 Fold is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!