Xiaomi Poco C85 vs itel RS4

53 out of 100
Xiaomi Poco C85
VS
47 out of 100
itel RS4

Here we compared two budget smartphones: the 6.9-inch Xiaomi Poco C85 (with MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra) that was released on September 1, 2025, against the itel RS4, which is powered by MediaTek Helio G99 Ultimate and came out 1 year and 5 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco C85
  • Water-resistant body (IP64 classification)
  • Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
  • Has a 0.34 inch larger screen size
  • More recent OS version: Android 15 versus 13
  • The phone is 1 year and 5 months newer
Reasons to consider the itel RS4
  • 64% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (565K versus 345K)
  • More energy-efficient CPU – Helio G99 Ultimate
  • Stereo speakers
  • Has 33% more RAM: 8GB versus 6GB
  • Supports higher wattage charging (45W versus 33W)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 2.2 versus eMMC 5.1
  • 72% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 701 and 408 points

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Poco C85 and itel RS4 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
54*
41*
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
81*
62*
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
53*
47*
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
6 / 128 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
158.4
(Excellent)
Value Index
102.8
(Excellent)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 6.9 inches 6.56 inches
Resolution 720 x 1600 pixels 720 x 1612 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 254 ppi 269 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 810 nits 1300 nits
HDR support No No
Touch sampling rate - 240 Hz
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 84.3% 84.2%
Screen space comparison
Poco C85
6.9β€³ (20:9 ratio) = 17.8 in2
itel RS4
6.56β€³ (20:9 ratio) = 16.1 in2
~10% more screen space

Design and build

Height 171.56 mm (6.75 inches) 163.5 mm (6.44 inches)
Width 79.47 mm (3.13 inches) 75.5 mm (2.97 inches)
Thickness 7.99 mm (0.31 inches) 8.15 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 205 g (7.23 oz) 198 g (6.98 oz)
Waterproof IP64 No
Rear material Plastic Plastic
Frame material Plastic Plastic
Colors Black, Green, Purple White, Black
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-button Yes, in-button
Repairability Average (2.63/5) -
Drop resistance Excellent (A) Β· 270 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio
84.3%
84.2%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Poco C85 and itel RS4
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra MediaTek Helio G99 Ultimate
Max clock 2000 MHz 2200 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 6 cores at 1.7 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 2 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A75
- 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 12 nanometers 6 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
GPU
Graphics Mali-G52 MP2 Mali-G57 MC2
GPU shading units 48 64
GPU clock 820 MHz 1000 MHz
FLOPS ~78.7 GFLOPS ~128 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Poco C85 and itel RS4
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
408
itel RS4 +72%
701
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
1375
itel RS4 +33%
1829
Compute Score (GPU)
Poco C85 +19%
971
818
Compute Score (GPU) 971 818
Single-core score 408 701
Multi-core score 1375 1829
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
345034
itel RS4 +64%
565979
CPU 129030 216069
GPU 23451 44802
Memory 93441 139079
UX 99112 166029
Total score 345034 565979
Samples [2 tests] [6 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
itel RS4 +87%
129
Stability - 87%
Graphics test 1 FPS 1 FPS
Graphics score 69 129
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
8690
itel RS4 +26%
10989
Web score 9820 10623
Video editing 5867 6335
Photo editing 17247 26138
Data manipulation 5547 6943
Writing score 9311 13147

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Poco C85
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-10 (Owen)AnTuTu 11345034
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-03 (Owen)AnTuTu 11322504
itel RS4
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-14 -> ZallAnTuTu 11560837
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-14 (Z@!!)AnTuTu 11560837
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-29 (Kns)AnTuTu 11571132
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-01 (Tashpe)AnTuTu 11572079
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-04 (QotorZR)AnTuTu 11565979

Memory

RAM
RAM size 6 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory clock 1800 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 128 GB
Storage type eMMC 5.1 UFS 2.2
Memory card MicroSD MicroSD
Memory card max size Up to 1024 GB -

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 13
ROM HyperOS 2.0 itel OS 13
OS updates 2 years -
Security updates 2 years -

Battery

Capacity 6000 mAh 5000 mAh
Max charge power 33 W 45 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes -
Fast charging Yes (50% in 31 min) Yes (80% in 30 min)
Full charging time 1:38 hr 1:13 hr
Battery cycles 1000 cycles -

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8160 x 6144 -
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording No No
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 60FPS
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Depth
1) Standard: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.6
Focal length 28 mm -
Sensor Samsung S5KJNS -
Sensor size 1/2.96" (β‰ˆ 0.34 inch) -
Pixel size 0.64 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 8 megapixels 8 megapixels
Aperture f/2.0 -
Sensor CMOS -
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization No No
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.1
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Galileo
NFC* Depends on the region Yes
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support No No

Sound

Speakers Mono Stereo
Headphone audio jack Yes Yes
FM radio Yes -
Dolby Atmos No No

Other

Category Budget Budget
Announced September 2025 April 2024
Release date September 2025 April 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $110 $110
Sensors - Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 45 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Poco C85 is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
1 (16.7%)
5 (83.3%)
Total votes: 6

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!