Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro vs Realme 16 Pro Plus

80 out of 100
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
VS
76 out of 100
Realme 16 Pro Plus

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.67-inch Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3) that was released on March 27, 2025, against the Realme 16 Pro Plus, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 and came out 9 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
  • 65% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2301K versus 1392K)
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
  • Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • 16% higher pixel density (526 vs 453 PPI)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 80W)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 3.1
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • 61% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2209 and 1374 points
Reasons to consider the Realme 16 Pro Plus
  • The rear camera has a 3.5x optical zoom
  • Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
  • Shows 22% longer battery life (34:57 vs 28:39 hours)
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Delivers 33% higher peak brightness (1962 against 1470 nits)
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • The phone is 9 months newer
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro and Realme 16 Pro Plus crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
73.7
(Good)
Value Index
57.8
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED OLED
Size 6.67 inches 6.8 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3200 pixels 1280 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
PPI 526 ppi 453 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes
Max rated brightness 1800 nits 1800 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3200 nits 6500 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz 240 Hz
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 7i Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Screen-to-body ratio 89.4% 91.6%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.4% -
PWM 120 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Peak brightness test (auto)
1470 nits
1962 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 160.26 mm (6.31 inches) 162.5 mm (6.4 inches)
Width 74.95 mm (2.95 inches) 76.3 mm (3 inches)
Thickness 8.12 mm (0.32 inches) 8.1 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 206 g (7.27 oz) 198 g (6.98 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber -
Rear material Glass Eco-leather
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Silver, Blue Gold, Gray, Pink
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Average (2.61/5) Good (3.2/5)
Drop resistance Good (C) Β· 90 drops Good (C) Β· 90 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
89.4%
91.6%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro and Realme 16 Pro Plus
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
Max clock 3300 MHz 2800 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) 8 (1 + 4 + 3)
Architecture - 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 3 cores at 1.84 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-520)
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-720)
- 1 core at 2.8 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-720)
L3 cache 12 MB 3 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Yes
GPU
Graphics Adreno 750 Adreno 722
GPU shading units 1536 512
GPU clock 903-1000 MHz 1150 MHz
FLOPS ~2774 GFLOPS ~1177.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro and Realme 16 Pro Plus
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2209
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
6642
Compute Score (GPU)
Poco F7 Pro +118%
17029
Compute Score (GPU) 17029 7820
Single-core score 2209 1374
Multi-core score 6642 4363
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
2301212
1392392
CPU 662841 504281
GPU 780484 321491
Memory 345533 209587
UX 512354 357033
Total score 2301212 1392392
Samples [33 tests] [5 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 82% -
Graphics test 11 FPS -
Graphics score 1506 -
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 29 FPS -
Section 1 32 FPS -
Section 2 29 FPS -
Section 3 25 FPS -
Graphics score 7581 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 16536 -
Video editing 7905 -
Photo editing 31248 -
Data manipulation 14260 -
Writing score 19168 -
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#184th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-05 -> Alejandro SorinAnTuTu2301212
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-06 (pop:3)AnTuTu2320179
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-05 (Π’ΡƒΡ€Π±ΠΎ)AnTuTu2488975
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-25 (Alejandro sorin)AnTuTu2421859
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-21 (Alejandro sorin)GeekBench GPU17142
Realme 16 Pro Plus
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-14 (Wal)AnTuTu1393909
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-20 -> PhilAnTuTu1396562
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-19 (febrycitizen)AnTuTu1392392
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-17 -> PhilAnTuTu1391276
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-13 -> PhilAnTuTu1359701

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 4800 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 3.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 16
ROM HyperOS 3.0 Realme UI 7.0
OS size 27.9 GB -
OS updates 6 years 5 years
Security updates 6 years 5 years

Battery

Capacity 6000 mAh 7000 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 80 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging No Yes
Fast charging Yes (50% in 16 min) Yes (62% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:37 hr 1:04 hr
Battery cycles 1000 cycles 1300 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 13:00 hr 18:05 hr
Watching video 14:33 hr 20:08 hr
Gaming 06:14 hr 08:00 hr
Standby 141 hr 140 hr
General battery life
28:39 hr
34:57 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 200 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 -
Zoom Digital, 20x Optical, 3.5x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 24FPS No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 1920 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens - 116Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/1.6 f/1.9
Focal length 24 mm 23 mm
Sensor OmniVision OVX8000 Samsung ISOCELL S5KHP5
Sensor size 1/1.55" (β‰ˆ 0.65 inch) 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 0.5 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution - 50 MP
Aperture - f/2.8
Focal length - 80 mm
Sensor - Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN5
Sensor size - 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size - 0.64 micron
Stabilization - Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm 15 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV08D OmniVision OV08D
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) 1/4" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 20 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 5184 x 3888 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.4
Focal length 21 mm 22 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV20B OmniVision OV50D
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) 1/2.88" (β‰ˆ 0.35 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 0.61 micron
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes No
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
90.9 dB

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced March 2025 January 2026
Release date April 2025 January 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $499 $445
Successor - Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro -
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 80 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the performance, gaming, connectivity, software, and sound are more important to you, then choose the Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro. But if the camera, battery life, and design are more of a priority – go for the Realme 16 Pro Plus.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
8 (33.3%)
16 (66.7%)
Total votes: 24

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!