Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs Oppo Reno 14 Pro
Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.67-inch Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite) that was released on March 27, 2025, against the Oppo Reno 14 Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8450 and came out 1 month after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
- 49% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3060K versus 2048K)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
- Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 80W)
- Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
- Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- 17% higher pixel density (526 vs 450 PPI)
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 3.1
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- 70% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2753 and 1617 points
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 14 Pro
- Comes with 900 mAh larger battery capacity: 6200 vs 5300 mAh
- The rear camera has a 3.5x optical zoom
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 inches | 6.83 inches |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels | 1272 x 2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | - |
| PPI | 526 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | 600 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 3200 nits | 1200 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 480 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Poco Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | 90.1% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.3% | - |
| PWM | 120 Hz | - |
| Response time | 1 ms | - |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | - |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 160.26 mm (6.31 inches) | 163.4 mm (6.43 inches) |
| Width | 74.95 mm (2.95 inches) | 77 mm (3.03 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.39 mm (0.33 inches) | 7.5 mm (0.3 inches) |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Yellow | White, Black, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | Average (2.61/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Average (D) · 45 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 8450 |
| Max clock | 4320 MHz | 3250 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M) - 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L) |
- 4 cores at 2.1 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-A725 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 6 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | MediaTek NPU 880 |
| Graphics | Adreno 830 | Mali-G720 MP7 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 896 |
| GPU clock | 1100 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3379.2 GFLOPS | ~2329.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 16908 | - |
| Single-core score | 2753 | 1617 |
| Multi-core score | 8410 | 6406 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 876139 | 652185 |
| GPU | 1135602 | 646177 |
| Memory | 434324 | 264179 |
| UX | 614928 | 485924 |
| Total score | 3060993 | 2048465 |
| Samples | [10 tests] | [3 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 77% | - |
| Graphics test | 16 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 2190 | - |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 38 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 43 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 39 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 33 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 10116 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 22176 | 24385 |
| Video editing | 8080 | 7667 |
| Photo editing | 36202 | 37896 |
| Data manipulation | 18123 | 11708 |
| Writing score | 23212 | 22929 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#99th place)
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-23 (Yunon) | AnTuTu 11 | 3042275 |
| 📘 2026-09-14 (LocDoge) | AnTuTu 12 | 3269338 |
| 📘 2026-09-09 (Yunon) | AnTuTu 12 | 3213348 |
| 📘 2026-09-09 (Yunon) | AnTuTu 12 | 3118621 |
| 📘 2026-08-31 (CarlosSM) | AnTuTu 11 | 3250834 |
Oppo Reno 14 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-05-05 (Rutam) | AnTuTu 11 | 2108697 |
| 📘 2025-12-24 (DiZhàn) | AnTuTu 11 | 2048465 |
| 📘 2025-12-05 (DiZhàn) | AnTuTu 11 | 1983406 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | - | 4266 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 15 |
| ROM | HyperOS 3.0 | ColorOS 15 |
| OS size | 33 GB | - |
| OS updates | 4 years | - |
| Security updates | 6 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 5300 mAh | 6200 mAh |
| Max charge power | 120 W | 80 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (50 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes |
| Bypass charging | No | - |
| Fast charging | Yes (60% in 15 min) | Yes (73% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:30 hr | 0:53 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1000 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | 11:39 hr | - |
| Watching video | 14:46 hr | - |
| Gaming | 05:50 hr | - |
| Standby | 124 hr | - |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#129th place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 2.5x | Optical, 3.5x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 24FPS | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 1920 FPS (720p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 120° | 116° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 32 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OVX8000 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.55" (≈ 0.65 inch) | 1/1.55" (≈ 0.65 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.8 |
| Focal length | 60 mm | 80 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.6 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 16 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KKD1 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/3.44" (≈ 0.29 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6528 x 4896 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KKD1 | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.42" (≈ 0.29 inch) | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.6 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | March 2025 | May 2025 |
| Release date | April 2025 | May 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $550 |
| Successor | - Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra | - Oppo Reno 15 Pro |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 80 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 22