Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs Oppo Reno 14 Pro

83 out of 100
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
VS
76 out of 100
Oppo Reno 14 Pro

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.67-inch Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite) that was released on March 27, 2025, against the Oppo Reno 14 Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8450 and came out 1 month after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
  • 49% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3060K versus 2048K)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 80W)
  • Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
  • Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • 17% higher pixel density (526 vs 450 PPI)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 3.1
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • 70% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2753 and 1617 points
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 14 Pro
  • Comes with 900 mAh larger battery capacity: 6200 vs 5300 mAh
  • The rear camera has a 3.5x optical zoom
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra and Oppo Reno 14 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
59.4
(Average)
Value Index
40.9
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.67 inches 6.83 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3200 pixels 1272 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 -
PPI 526 ppi 450 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes
Max rated brightness 1800 nits 600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3200 nits 1200 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz -
Screen protection Poco Shield Glass Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Screen-to-body ratio 89.4% 90.1%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.3% -
PWM 120 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Peak brightness test (auto)
1608 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 160.26 mm (6.31 inches) 163.4 mm (6.43 inches)
Width 74.95 mm (2.95 inches) 77 mm (3.03 inches)
Thickness 8.39 mm (0.33 inches) 7.5 mm (0.3 inches)
Weight 212 g (7.48 oz) 201 g (7.09 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Yellow White, Black, Purple
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Average (2.61/5) -
Drop resistance Average (D) · 45 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio
90.1%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra and Oppo Reno 14 Pro
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 8450
Max clock 4320 MHz 3250 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
- 4 cores at 2.1 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-A725
L3 cache 8 MB 6 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon MediaTek NPU 880
GPU
Graphics Adreno 830 Mali-G720 MP7
GPU shading units 1536 896
GPU clock 1100 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS ~2329.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra and Oppo Reno 14 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2753
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
8410
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 16908 -
Single-core score 2753 1617
Multi-core score 8410 6406
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
3060993
2048465
CPU 876139 652185
GPU 1135602 646177
Memory 434324 264179
UX 614928 485924
Total score 3060993 2048465
Samples [10 tests] [3 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 77% -
Graphics test 16 FPS -
Graphics score 2190 -
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 38 FPS -
Section 1 43 FPS -
Section 2 39 FPS -
Section 3 33 FPS -
Graphics score 10116 -
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
19302
17957
Web score 22176 24385
Video editing 8080 7667
Photo editing 36202 37896
Data manipulation 18123 11708
Writing score 23212 22929

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-23 (Yunon)AnTuTu 113042275
📘 2026-09-14 (LocDoge)AnTuTu 123269338
📘 2026-09-09 (Yunon)AnTuTu 123213348
📘 2026-09-09 (Yunon)AnTuTu 123118621
📘 2026-08-31 (CarlosSM)AnTuTu 113250834
Oppo Reno 14 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-05-05 (Rutam)AnTuTu 112108697
📘 2025-12-24 (DiZhàn)AnTuTu 112048465
📘 2025-12-05 (DiZhàn)AnTuTu 111983406

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock - 4266 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 3.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 15
ROM HyperOS 3.0 ColorOS 15
OS size 33 GB -
OS updates 4 years -
Security updates 6 years -

Battery

Capacity 5300 mAh 6200 mAh
Max charge power 120 W 80 W
Battery type Li-Po Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) Yes (50 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes
Bypass charging No -
Fast charging Yes (60% in 15 min) Yes (73% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:30 hr 0:53 hr
Battery cycles 1000 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 11:39 hr -
Watching video 14:46 hr -
Gaming 05:50 hr -
Standby 124 hr -
General battery life
26:17 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 2.5x Optical, 3.5x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 24FPS No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 1920 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 120° 116°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 32 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.6 f/1.8
Focal length 24 mm 24 mm
Sensor OmniVision OVX8000 -
Sensor size 1/1.55" (≈ 0.65 inch) 1/1.55" (≈ 0.65 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.8
Focal length 60 mm 80 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN5 Samsung S5KJN5
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.6 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 32 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 15 mm 16 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KKD1 -
Sensor size 1/3.44" (≈ 0.29 inch) -
Pixel size 0.7 micron -
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 6528 x 4896 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 24 mm 21 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KKD1 Samsung S5KJN5
Sensor size 1/3.42" (≈ 0.29 inch) 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.6 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Flagship Mid-range
Announced March 2025 May 2025
Release date April 2025 May 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $649 $550
Successor - Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra - Oppo Reno 15 Pro
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 80 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
9 (40.9%)
13 (59.1%)
Total votes: 22

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!