Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro vs F7 Pro

85 out of 100
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
VS
79 out of 100
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.59-inch Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite) that was released on November 26, 2025, against the Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and came out 9 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
  • Delivers 137% higher peak brightness (3473 against 1466 nits)
  • The rear camera has a 2.5x optical zoom
  • 36% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3124K versus 2301K)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
  • 36% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3013 and 2209 points
  • The phone is 9 months newer
  • Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
  • 26% higher pixel density (526 vs 419 PPI)
  • Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro and F7 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
85.3
(Very good)
Value Index
71.7
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.59 inches 6.67 inches
Resolution 1156 x 2510 pixels 1440 x 3200 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
PPI 419 ppi 526 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 2000 nits 1800 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3500 nits 3200 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz 480 Hz
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 7i Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Screen-to-body ratio 90% 89.4%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.8% 99.4%
PWM 120 Hz 120 Hz
Response time 1 ms 1 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
Poco F8 Pro +137%
3473 nits
1466 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 157.5 mm (6.2 inches) 160.26 mm (6.31 inches)
Width 75.2 mm (2.96 inches) 74.95 mm (2.95 inches)
Thickness 8 mm (0.31 inches) 8.12 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 199 g (7.02 oz) 206 g (7.27 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP68
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Silver, Blue Black, Silver, Blue
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Average (2.63/5) Average (2.61/5)
Drop resistance Very good (B) · 180 drops Good (C) · 90 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
90%
89.4%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro and Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Max clock 4470 MHz 3300 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
- 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache 8 MB 12 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 830 Adreno 750
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1100 MHz 903-1000 MHz
FLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS ~2774 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro and Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
3013
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
9287
Compute Score (GPU)
18324
17029
Compute Score (GPU) 18324 17029
Single-core score 3013 2209
Multi-core score 9287 6642
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
3124552
2301212
CPU 947041 662841
GPU 1160694 780484
Memory 387566 345533
UX 629251 512354
Total score 3124552 2301212
Samples [32 tests] [33 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability - 82%
Graphics test - 11 FPS
Graphics score - 1506
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test - 29 FPS
Section 1 - 32 FPS
Section 2 - 29 FPS
Section 3 - 25 FPS
Graphics score - 7581
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 16536
Video editing - 7905
Photo editing - 31248
Data manipulation - 14260
Writing score - 19168
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (90th and 197th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-05 (poco f8 pro)AnTuTu 123478780
📘 2026-09-20 (Kain Le Main)AnTuTu 123251600
📘 2026-08-07 -> Jayjellyjafetjessy_88AnTuTu 113084676
📘 2026-07-31 (Takehashi)AnTuTu 113167640
📘 2026-07-22 (Chilliadx)AnTuTu 113043142
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-02 (fx)AnTuTu 122392357
📘 2026-09-30 (EA Fran)AnTuTu 122452758
📘 2026-09-29 -> Alejandro SorinAnTuTu 122597186
📘 2026-09-16 (Jepp)AnTuTu 122526342
📘 2026-07-05 -> Alejandro SorinAnTuTu 112301212

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz 4800 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM HyperOS 3 HyperOS 3.0
OS size - 27.9 GB
OS updates 5 years 6 years
Security updates - 6 years

Battery

Capacity 6210 mAh 6000 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 90 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging No No
Fast charging Yes (80% in 30 min) Yes (50% in 16 min)
Full charging time 0:39 hr 0:37 hr
Battery cycles 1000 cycles 1000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 12:55 hr 13:00 hr
Watching video 21:09 hr 14:33 hr
Gaming 07:36 hr 06:14 hr
Standby 122 hr 141 hr
General battery life
30:03 hr
28:39 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 2.5x Digital, 20x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 24FPS
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) 1920 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens 120° -
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.6
Focal length 24 mm 24 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV50 Light Hunter 800 OmniVision OVX8000
Sensor size 1/1.55" (≈ 0.65 inch) 1/1.55" (≈ 0.65 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP -
Aperture f/2.2 -
Focal length 60 mm -
Sensor Omnivision OV50M -
Sensor size 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch) -
Pixel size 0.612 micron -
Stabilization Digital -
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm 15 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV08F OmniVision OV08D
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size - 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 20 megapixels 20 megapixels
Image resolution - 5184 x 3888
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 21 mm 21 mm
Sensor CMOS OmniVision OV20B
Sensor size 1/2" (≈ 0.5 inch) 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.7 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version - 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort - No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
93 dB
90.9 dB

Other

Category Flagship Mid-range
Announced November 2025 March 2025
Release date November 2025 April 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $579 $499
Successor - - Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 100 W Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro. It has a better camera, performance, gaming, and connectivity.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
240 (75.9%)
76 (24.1%)
Total votes: 316

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Hani November 29, 2025 at 12:07 AM
Please Correct the performance Correct the battery It is good that u corrected the gaming
+10 Reply
Avatar
Hani November 27, 2025 at 11:42 PM
Again and again What is wrong ??????! Performance and gaming !!!!!!!!!¡!!!!!!
+15 Reply