Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.9-inch Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on November 26, 2025, against the Huawei Mate 80 Pro, which is powered by HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
  • 2.2x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3862K versus 1725K)
  • The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 12
  • Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
  • Comes with 750 mAh larger battery capacity: 6500 vs 5750 mAh
  • More energy-efficient CPU – Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  • 2.6x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3604 and 1362 points
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Huawei Mate 80 Pro
  • 11% higher pixel density (460 vs 416 PPI)
  • CPU with a higher amount of cores (+1)

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra and Huawei Mate 80 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
48.5
(Average)
Value Index
32.7
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED OLED
Size 6.9 inches 6.75 inches
Resolution 1200 x 2608 pixels 1280 x 2832 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
PPI 416 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 2000 nits -
Max rated brightness in HDR 3500 nits 3000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz 300 Hz
Screen protection Poco Shield Glass Huawei Kunlun Glass 2
Screen-to-body ratio 91.9% 90.9%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.6% -
PWM 120 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Peak brightness test (auto)
3527 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 163.33 mm (6.43 inches) 161.85 mm (6.37 inches)
Width 77.82 mm (3.06 inches) 76 mm (2.99 inches)
Thickness 7.9 mm (0.31 inches) 7.95 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 218 g (7.69 oz) 219 g (7.72 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP68
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material - Plastic
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Blue White, Black, Gold, Green
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-button
Repairability Average (2.63/5) -
Drop resistance Excellent (A) Β· 270 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio
91.9%
90.9%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra and Huawei Mate 80 Pro
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
Max clock 4600 MHz 2750 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 9 (1 + 4 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.61 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
- 4 cores at 1.72 GHz: Taishan v124 Little
- 4 cores at 2.27 GHz: Taishan v124 Mid
- 1 core at 2.75 GHz: Taishan v124 Big
L3 cache 12 MB 12 MB
Manufacturing TSMC SMIC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 5 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Da Vinci
GPU
Graphics Adreno 840 Maleoon 935
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1200 MHz 933 MHz
FLOPS ~3686.4 GFLOPS ~2866.1 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra and Huawei Mate 80 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
3604
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
10752
Compute Score (GPU)
27501
Compute Score (GPU) 27501 8043
Single-core score 3604 1362
Multi-core score 10752 5169
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
3862914
1725229
CPU 1113289 515961
GPU 1452771 484107
Memory 507250 431535
UX 789604 293626
Total score 3862914 1725229
Samples [36 tests] Less than 3

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-04 (Bestiqooguyidk)AnTuTu3812038
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-27 (Miguelmangake)GeekBench GPU24095
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-27 (Miguelmangake)GeekBench CPU3549 / 10648
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-27 (Miguelmangake)AnTuTu4004181
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-25 (freqr)AnTuTu3737293
Huawei Mate 80 Pro
No benchmark results yet

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 12
ROM HyperOS 3 EMUI 15
OS size 36 GB -
OS updates 4 years -
Security updates 6 years -

Battery

Capacity 6500 mAh 5750 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 100 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) Yes (80 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging No No
Fast charging Yes (78% in 15 min) Yes (50% in 13 min)
Full charging time 0:39 hr 0:32 hr
Battery cycles 1000 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 15:14 hr -
Watching video 22:44 hr -
Gaming 08:06 hr -
Standby 124 hr -
General battery life
32:38 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 5x Optical, 4x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 1920 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 102Β° 120Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 48 MP
3) Ultrawide: 40 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.7 f/1.4 - 4.0
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Sensor Omnivision Light Hunter 950 -
Sensor size 1/1.31" (β‰ˆ 0.76 inch) 1/1.28" (β‰ˆ 0.78 inch)
Pixel size 1.2 micron 1.6 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 48 MP
Aperture f/3.0 f/2.1
Focal length 115 mm 93 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN5 -
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/2.55" (β‰ˆ 0.39 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron -
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 40 MP
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.2
Focal length 18 mm 13 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV50M40 Omnivision OV40A
Sensor size 1/2.88" (β‰ˆ 0.35 inch) 1/1.7" (β‰ˆ 0.59 inch)
Pixel size 0.61 micron 1 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 13 megapixels
Image resolution - 4160 x 3120
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 21 mm 18 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV32D CMOS
Sensor size 1/3.44" (β‰ˆ 0.29 inch) -
Pixel size 0.64 micron -
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No Yes

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.1
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes, DP 1.2
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Depends on the region Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers 2.1 Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced November 2025 November 2025
Release date November 2025 November 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $729 $1099
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Face recognition sensor
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 100 W Yes, 100 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
4 (57.1%)
3 (42.9%)
Total votes: 7

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!