Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra vs Vivo X300 E

90 out of 100
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
VS
86 out of 100
Vivo X300 E

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.9-inch Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on November 26, 2025, against the Vivo X300 E, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 and came out 9 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
  • The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
  • Handles wireless charging up to 50W
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Has a 0.31 inch larger screen size
  • 34% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3862K versus 2886K)
  • Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
  • 28% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3604 and 2813 points
  • Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Vivo X300 E
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • Comes with 700 mAh larger battery capacity: 7200 vs 6500 mAh
  • 10% higher pixel density (459 vs 416 PPI)
  • The phone is 9 months newer
  • Weighs 18 grams less

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra and Vivo X300 E crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
47.3
(Average)
Value Index
66.9
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.9 inches 6.59 inches
Resolution 1200 x 2608 pixels 1260 x 2750 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
PPI 416 ppi 459 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes
Max rated brightness 2000 nits 1800 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3500 nits 5000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz 300 Hz
Screen protection Poco Shield Glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 91.9% 91.1%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.6% -
PWM 120 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Screen space comparison
Poco F8 Ultra
6.9β€³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 18.1 in2
X300 E
6.59β€³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 16.5 in2
~9% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
3533 nits
n/a
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 163.33 mm (6.43 inches) 157.5 mm (6.2 inches)
Width 77.82 mm (3.06 inches) 74.3 mm (2.93 inches)
Thickness 7.9 mm (0.31 inches) 7.8 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 218 g (7.69 oz) 200 g (7.05 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material - Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Blue White, Gray, Orange
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Average (2.63/5) -
Drop resistance Excellent (A) Β· 270 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio
91.9%
91.1%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra and Vivo X300 E
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
Max clock 4600 MHz 3800 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
- 6 cores at 3.32 GHz: Oryon Performance
- 2 cores at 3.8 GHz: Oryon Prime
L3 cache 8 MB 6 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 840 Adreno 829
GPU shading units 1536 1024
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1225 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~2508.8 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra and Vivo X300 E
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
3604
2813
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
10752
9056
Compute Score (GPU)
27501
17022
Compute Score (GPU) 27501 17022
Single-core score 3604 2813
Multi-core score 10752 9056
Sources: Geekbench [3]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
3862914
2886527
CPU 1113289 887251
GPU 1452771 951094
Memory 507250 384303
UX 789604 663879
Total score 3862914 2886527
Samples [36 tests] Less than 3
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (37th and 126th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (Johnnis)AnTuTu 123903835
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 (Π›Π°ΠΏΠΊΠ°)AnTuTu 123944588
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-22 -> ChubzueyAnTuTu 124214043
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-13 -> ChubzueyAnTuTu 124143093
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-04 (Bestiqooguyidk)AnTuTu 113812038
Vivo X300 E
No benchmark results yet

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM HyperOS 3 OriginOS 6
OS size 36 GB -
OS updates 4 years -
Security updates 6 years -

Battery

Capacity 6500 mAh 7200 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 90 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) No
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes
Bypass charging No -
Fast charging Yes (78% in 15 min) Yes
Full charging time 0:39 hr -
Battery cycles 1000 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 15:14 hr -
Watching video 22:44 hr -
Gaming 08:06 hr -
Standby 124 hr -
General battery life
32:38 hr
n/a

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 5x Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 1920 FPS (720p) 960 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 102Β° 110Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.7 f/1.9
Focal length 23 mm -
Sensor Omnivision Light Hunter 950 -
Sensor size 1/1.31" (β‰ˆ 0.76 inch) -
Pixel size 1.2 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/3.0 f/2.6
Focal length 115 mm 70 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN5 Sony IMX882
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.8 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.2
Focal length 18 mm 15 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV50M40 -
Sensor size 1/2.88" (β‰ˆ 0.35 inch) 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 0.61 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution - 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 21 mm 21 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV32D Samsung S5KJN1
Sensor size 1/3.44" (β‰ˆ 0.29 inch) 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.64 micron
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Depends on the region Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers 2.1 Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
89.6 dB
n/a

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced November 2025 July 2026
Release date November 2025 July 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $729 $710
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 100 W Yes, 90 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the performance, gaming, connectivity, software, design, and sound are more important to you, then choose the Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra. But if the display is more of a priority – go for the Vivo X300 E.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
1 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!