Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.67-inch Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra) that was released on January 9, 2025, against the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, which is powered by Exynos 2400e and came out 3 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
  • Comes with 1300 mAh larger battery capacity: 6000 vs 4700 mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 25W)
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • 16% higher pixel density (446 vs 385 PPI)
  • Weighs 18 grams less
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
  • The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
  • Handles wireless charging up to 15W
  • Delivers 9% higher peak brightness (1368 against 1259 nits)
  • CPU with a higher amount of cores (+2)
  • 30% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2045 and 1573 points
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
107.5
(Excellent)
Value Index
67.9
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED Dynamic AMOLED
Size 6.67 inches 6.7 inches
Resolution 1220 x 2712 pixels 1080 x 2340 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
PPI 446 ppi 385 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1400 nits 1300 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3200 nits 1900 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz -
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 7i Gorilla Glass Victus Plus
Screen-to-body ratio 88.8% 88%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space 99.6% 100%
PWM 120 Hz 120 Hz
Response time 1 ms 2 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
1259 nits
1368 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 160.75 mm (6.33 inches) 162 mm (6.38 inches)
Width 75.24 mm (2.96 inches) 77.3 mm (3.04 inches)
Thickness 8.29 mm (0.33 inches) 8 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 195 g (6.88 oz) 213 g (7.51 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP68
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Plastic Glass
Frame material Plastic Metal
Colors Black, Green, Yellow Black, Gray, Blue, Green, Yellow
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3.11/5)
Drop resistance - Excellent (A) · 270 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
88.8%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra Samsung Exynos 2400e
Max clock 3250 MHz 3110 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 10 (1 + 2 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.1 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 3 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 2 cores at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.11 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache 6 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 880 Yes
GPU
Graphics Mali-G720 MC7 Xclipse 940
GPU shading units 896 768
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1095 MHz
FLOPS ~2329.6 GFLOPS ~3406.8 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2045
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
6397
Compute Score (GPU)
12162
16611
Compute Score (GPU) 12162 16611
Single-core score 1573 2045
Multi-core score 6102 6397
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
1930851
1977269
CPU 621813 675682
GPU 602568 670589
Memory 295421 229976
UX 411049 401022
Total score 1930851 1977269
Samples [212 tests] [55 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
1769
Stability 80% 70%
Graphics test 10 FPS 13 FPS
Graphics score 1285 1769
3DMark Solar Bay
7699
Graphics test 23 FPS 29 FPS
Section 1 24 FPS 35 FPS
Section 2 23 FPS 28 FPS
Section 3 20 FPS 24 FPS
Graphics score 5931 7699
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
13994
16227
Web score 14924 15997
Video editing 6707 8031
Photo editing 23231 33878
Data manipulation 12242 12347
Writing score 18327 19836

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-24 (Xann)AnTuTu 122143962
📘 2026-09-23 (AYS)AnTuTu 122192420
📘 2026-09-21 (JenKenny)AnTuTu 112063774
📘 2026-09-20 (POCOMAN)AnTuTu 122112771
📘 2026-09-16 (Alex)AnTuTu 112004654
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-21 (Vishnu)AnTuTu 122276561
📘 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShCPU Throttle81%
📘 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShAnTuTu 122134029
📘 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShCPU Throttle0%
📘 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShGeekbench 6 CPU2014 / 6373

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 4200 MHz 4200 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM HyperOS 3.0 One UI 8.0
OS size - 23.5 GB
OS updates 3 years 4 years
Security updates 4 years 7 years

Battery

Capacity 6000 mAh 4700 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 25 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No Yes (15 W)
Reverse charging Yes Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging No No
Fast charging Yes (50% in 17 min) Yes (56% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:42 hr 1:10 hr
Battery cycles - 2000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 10:29 hr 07:20 hr
Watching video 15:22 hr 13:33 hr
Gaming 05:54 hr 05:11 hr
Standby 93 hr 129 hr
General battery life
23:02 hr
23:02 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8160 x 6120
Zoom Digital Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 120FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) 960 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens - 123°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 8 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.5 f/1.8
Focal length 26 mm 24 mm
Sensor Sony IMX882 Samsung ISOCELL S5KGN3
Sensor size 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) 1/1.57" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution - 8 MP
Aperture - f/2.4
Focal length - 75 mm
Sensor - OmniVision OV08A10
Sensor size - 1/4.4" (≈ 0.23 inch)
Pixel size - 1 micron
Stabilization - Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm 13 mm
Sensor Smartsens SC820CS Samsung S5K3L6
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) 1/3.0" (≈ 0.33 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh - 60
Preview - 69
Zoom - 126
Samples - Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S24 FE from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 20 megapixels 10 megapixels
Image resolution 5184 x 3888 3648 x 2736
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.4
Focal length 21 mm 26 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV20B Samsung S5K3J1
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) 1/2.65" (≈ 0.38 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 1.22 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Depends on the region Yes
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* - 20
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
91.5 dB
91.9 dB

Other

Category Mid-range Flagship
Announced January 2025 September 2024
Release date January 2025 October 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $299 $649
Successor - Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max - Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
SAR (head) 0.99 W/kg 0.86 W/kg
SAR (body) 0.99 W/kg 1.29 W/kg
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Not included
Further details
Notes on Poco X7 Pro:
    - The eco-leather version is thicker at 8.43 mm and weighs 198 grams.
Notes on Galaxy S24 FE:
    - The 128 GB variant features UFS 3.1 memory, other models have UFS 4.0.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the performance, gaming, connectivity, and design are more important to you, then choose the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE. But if the battery life is more of a priority – go for the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
531 (51%)
510 (49%)
Total votes: 1041

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Actually Smart Guy September 21, 2025 at 01:00 AM
People who pick Poco X7 Pro are biased xiaomi fans who think they know it all lol. Samsung S24 FE is significantly better. I have one and comparing it to Poco X7 Pro makes a massive difference. The POCO feels cheap while the Samsung feels premium. Not to mention I bought the Samsung S24 FE for like 7$ more the price ofa POCO X7 Pro in an absolutely brand new condition. Not only that, they only focus on battery size and charging speed. First off, anything above 45 watts is extremely unnecessary and dangerous for your battery. Second, optimized 4500 mAh >>> unoptimized 6000 mAh. The POCO might feel longer lasting at first, but after 3 months MAX, it's battery is gonna drain significantly faster than the Samsung. And as we can see, the performance and gaming experience are infact much better than POCO, so there's that for "performance beast" lol. So if you're smart, buy Samsung. If you're easily brainwashed, by POCO
+6 Reply
Avatar
anonymous July 1, 2025 at 05:17 PM
s24 fe destroys the x7 pro EASILY as shown in the specification list
+14 Reply
Avatar
some guy July 11, 2025 at 03:06 AM
Yeah but for the poco is half the price, and it is still able to compete with a flagship killer as a midrange
+12 Reply
Avatar
HAa June 7, 2025 at 12:55 PM
In my country two devices same price...
+8 Reply
Avatar
Me £ January 31, 2025 at 06:55 PM
S24 FE has a better camera, performance, software, films 8K30 and 4K60 on the front camera, and better features.
+47 Reply
Avatar
Nerdnolifeloser January 29, 2025 at 02:38 PM
X7 pro users are emotionally immature. Why vote for x7 pro while s24fe is obviously much better im everything.
+67 Reply
Avatar
Reza June 11, 2025 at 05:49 PM
1. I can see pixels in s24fe with my eyes you are blind 2. Battery backup is very low 3. Charging is so slowly in 2025 4. No charger 5. Ion battery in 2025!!!! I never pay for brand
+13 Reply
Avatar
Miguel July 28, 2025 at 10:47 AM
Reza, Even so, s24 fe being absurdly better for 2500 reais while the poco x7 pro having to use a cooler, choose the option you want then
0 Reply
Avatar
Actually Smart Guy September 21, 2025 at 01:01 AM
Reza, You can't actually be serious, right???
0 Reply