Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro vs Huawei Enjoy 90 Pro Max

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.59-inch Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra) that was released on March 17, 2026, against the Huawei Enjoy 90 Pro Max, which is powered by HiSilicon Kirin 8000. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
  • 2.6x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2085K versus 804K)
  • Optical image stabilization
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 40W)
  • Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
  • More energy-efficient CPU – Dimensity 8500 Ultra
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • 77% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1707 and 962 points
  • Weighs 30.5 grams less
Reasons to consider the Huawei Enjoy 90 Pro Max
  • Comes with 2000 mAh larger battery capacity: 8500 vs 6500 mAh
  • Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro and Huawei Enjoy 90 Pro Max crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
145.9
(Excellent)
Value Index
153.1
(Excellent)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED OLED
Size 6.59 inches 6.84 inches
Resolution 1268 x 2756 pixels 1272 x 2756 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
PPI 460 ppi 444 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (30-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 2000 nits -
Max rated brightness in HDR 3500 nits 4000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz -
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 7i Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 90% 90.1%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.5% -
PWM 120 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Screen space comparison
Enjoy 90 Pro Max
6.84β€³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 17.8 in2
Poco X8 Pro
6.59β€³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 16.5 in2
~7% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 157.53 mm (6.2 inches) 163.3 mm (6.43 inches)
Width 75.19 mm (2.96 inches) 78 mm (3.07 inches)
Thickness 8.38 mm (0.33 inches) 8 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 201.5 g (7.11 oz) 232 g (8.18 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP65
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber -
Rear material Glass Plastic
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Green White, Black, Gold, Blue
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-button
Repairability Average (2.63/5) -
Drop resistance Excellent (A) Β· 270 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro and Huawei Enjoy 90 Pro Max
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra HiSilicon Kirin 8000
Max clock 3400 MHz 2400 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 3 cores at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 1 core at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 4 cores at 1.84 GHz: A55
- 3 cores at 2.19 GHz: 1xA77 L
- 1 core at 2.4 GHz: 1xA77 H
L3 cache 6 MB -
Manufacturing TSMC SMIC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 7 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 880 Yes
GPU
Graphics Mali-G720 MP8 Mali-G610 MP4
GPU shading units 1024 -
GPU clock 1508 MHz 864 MHz
FLOPS ~3088.4 GFLOPS ~442.3 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro and Huawei Enjoy 90 Pro Max
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Poco X8 Pro +158%
6611
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 13461 -
Single-core score 1707 962
Multi-core score 6611 2558
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Poco X8 Pro +159%
2085754
CPU 621995 292137
GPU 630489 106992
Memory 372899 194207
UX 460371 211037
Total score 2085754 804373
Samples [59 tests] Less than 3

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (ghostrider)AnTuTu 122411267
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-13 (Flisfy)AnTuTu 122130144
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 (Kunmeow22)Geekbench 6 CPU1547 / 6536
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (Ste69)AnTuTu 111906081
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 (Gb)AnTuTu 112193549
Huawei Enjoy 90 Pro Max
No benchmark results yet

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory clock - 2133 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 -
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 HarmonyOS 6
ROM HyperOS 3.0 -
OS size 34 GB -
OS updates 5 years -
Security updates 6 years -

Battery

Capacity 6500 mAh 8500 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 40 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging No No
Fast charging Yes (75% in 30 min) Yes
Full charging time 0:41 hr -
Battery cycles 1000 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 11:43 hr -
Watching video 20:29 hr -
Gaming 07:35 hr -
Standby 113 hr -
General battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 30FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) -
Angle of widest lens 120Β° -
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.5 f/1.9
Focal length 26 mm -
Sensor Sony LYT-600 -
Sensor size 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch) 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Digital
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP -
Aperture f/2.2 -
Focal length 15 mm -
Sensor SmartSens SC821CS -
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Stabilization Digital -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 20 megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution 5184 x 3888 3264 x 2448
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 25 mm -
Sensor OmniVision OV20B CMOS
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 0.7 micron -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
NFC* Depends on the region Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced March 2026 March 2026
Release date March 2026 April 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $329 $245
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 100 W Yes, 40 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!