Xiaomi Redmi K80 Ultra vs K80 Pro

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.83-inch Xiaomi Redmi K80 Ultra (with MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus) that was released on June 26, 2025, against the Xiaomi Redmi K80 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and came out 7 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi K80 Ultra
  • Comes with 1410 mAh larger battery capacity: 7410 vs 6000 mAh
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
  • The phone is 7 months newer
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi K80 Pro
  • The rear camera has a 2.5x optical zoom
  • Handles wireless charging up to 50W
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
  • 18% higher pixel density (526 vs 447 PPI)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 100W)

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi K80 Ultra and K80 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
99.8
(Very good)
Value Index
53.8
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type OLED AMOLED
Size 6.83 inches 6.67 inches
Resolution 1280 x 2772 pixels 1440 x 3200 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
PPI 447 ppi 526 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1800 nits 1800 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3200 nits 3200 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz 480 Hz
Screen protection Tempered glass Longjing glass 2
Screen-to-body ratio 90% 89.4%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming

Design and build

Height 163.4 mm (6.43 inches) 160.26 mm (6.31 inches)
Width 77.9 mm (3.07 inches) 74.95 mm (2.95 inches)
Thickness 8.2 mm (0.32 inches) 8.39 mm (0.33 inches)
Weight 219 g (7.72 oz) 212 g (7.48 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP68
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Gray, Blue, Green White, Black, Green
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi K80 Ultra and Xiaomi Redmi K80 Pro
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Max clock 3630 MHz 4320 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.73 GHz: Cortex-X925
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
L3 cache 12 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 890 Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 Adreno 830
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1612 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS ~4952.1 GFLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi K80 Ultra and Xiaomi Redmi K80 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 23887 23881
Single-core score 2877 3049
Multi-core score 9174 9184
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
2926668
3068164
CPU 880310 876628
GPU 988809 1108143
Memory 415150 438174
UX 642399 645219
Total score 2926668 3068164
Samples [16 tests] [8 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability - 80%
Graphics test - 17 FPS
Graphics score - 2250
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test - 39 FPS
Section 1 - 43 FPS
Section 2 - 39 FPS
Section 3 - 33 FPS
Graphics score - 10173
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Stability - 75%
Graphics test - 34 FPS
Graphics score - 5841
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 21924
Video editing - 8128
Photo editing - 37071
Data manipulation - 18264
Writing score - 21828
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (123rd and 101st place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi K80 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-24 -> Tablet2023Battery lifeSOT 8:43 / 34:56
📘 2026-09-24 -> Tablet2023Battery lifeSOT 8:43 / 28:46
📘 2026-09-19 -> Syed Shahzaib SubhaniAnTuTu 123103556
📘 2026-09-14 (1mpressa)AnTuTu 122956884
📘 2026-08-22 (DinoXSMAX)AnTuTu 113046337
Xiaomi Redmi K80 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-01 (Reza)AnTuTu 113315848
📘 2026-05-15 (Asura)AnTuTu 113385729
📘 2026-05-06 (Mine_Tuan271)AnTuTu 113068164
📘 2026-03-17 (AsuraVN)AnTuTu 113014660
📘 2026-03-16 (AsuraVN)AnTuTu 112978441

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5333 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM HyperOS 2.0 HyperOS 3
OS updates - 4 years
Security updates - 5 years

Battery

Capacity 7410 mAh 6000 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 120 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No Yes (50 W)
Reverse charging Yes Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging No No
Fast charging Yes Yes (50% in 11 min)
Full charging time - 0:28 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital Optical, 2.5x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 24FPS
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) 1920 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens 119° 120°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 32 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.6
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV50 Light Hunter 800 OmniVision Light Hunter 800
Sensor size 1/1.55" (≈ 0.65 inch) 1/1.55" (≈ 0.65 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution - 50 MP
Aperture - f/2.0
Focal length - 60 mm
Sensor - Samsung S5KJN5
Sensor size - 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size - 0.64 micron
Stabilization - Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 32 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length - 15 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV08F Samsung ISOCELL S5KKD1
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) 1/3.44" (≈ 0.29 inch)
Pixel size - 0.7 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 20 megapixels 20 megapixels
Sensor Omnivision OV20B Omnivision OV20B
Sensor size 1/2.0" (≈ 0.5 inch) 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size - 0.8 micron
Autofocus - No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version - 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort - No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio - No
Dolby Atmos No No

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced June 2025 November 2024
Release date June 2025 November 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $399 $510
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 100 W Yes, 120 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Xiaomi Redmi K80 Pro. It has a better camera, connectivity, and software.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
94 (29.8%)
221 (70.2%)
Total votes: 315

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Edward devtoun November 27, 2025 at 10:54 AM
K80 is perfect because it has telephoto camera
+16 Reply
Avatar
RandomAccessMemory October 29, 2025 at 07:10 PM
Redmi K80 pro is for all around performance quality Redmi K80 ultra(extreme edition) is Gaming focus efficiency
+5 Reply
Avatar
kem July 13, 2025 at 12:36 PM
K80 Pro is better in overall specs. How in the fk is it called Ultra if the Pro is better and the Pro is more expensive than Ultra? 🫨
+10 Reply
Serhii July 15, 2025 at 07:00 AM
According to official specs, Pro is better. It even doesn't have telephoto camera
+19 Reply
Avatar
Saidbilol October 16, 2025 at 05:11 AM
Because, K80 ultra actually called extreme edition in China, so it's not ultra
+2 Reply
Avatar
Sean ッ July 6, 2025 at 03:28 AM
I think the price is Incorrect. K80 Ultra is 350$, not 900$
+16 Reply