Xiaomi Redmi K90 Pro Max vs Honor Magic 8 Pro Air

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.9-inch Xiaomi Redmi K90 Pro Max (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on October 23, 2025, against the Honor Magic 8 Pro Air, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9500 and came out 3 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi K90 Pro Max
  • Has a 0.59 inch larger screen size
  • Comes with 2060 mAh larger battery capacity: 7560 vs 5500 mAh
  • The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 80W)
  • 10% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3687 and 3366 points
Reasons to consider the Honor Magic 8 Pro Air
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • 14% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4430K versus 3897K)
  • 11% higher pixel density (461 vs 416 PPI)
  • Weighs 63 grams less
  • Better grip in hands – the body is 5.92 mm narrower
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi K90 Pro Max and Honor Magic 8 Pro Air crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
101.2
(Excellent)
Value Index
22.6
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type OLED OLED
Size 6.9 inches 6.31 inches
Resolution 1200 x 2608 pixels 1216 x 2640 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
PPI 416 ppi 461 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness - 1800 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3500 nits 6000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz -
Screen protection Xiaomi Dragon Crystal Glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 91.9% 90.4%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Screen space comparison
Redmi K90 Pro Max
6.9β€³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 18.1 in2
Magic 8 Pro Air
6.31β€³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 15.1 in2
~19% more screen space

Design and build

Height 163.33 mm (6.43 inches) 150.5 mm (5.93 inches)
Width 77.82 mm (3.06 inches) 71.9 mm (2.83 inches)
Thickness 7.9 mm (0.31 inches) 6.1 mm (0.24 inches)
Weight 218 g (7.69 oz) 155 g (5.47 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Blue White, Black, Gold, Orange
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi K90 Pro Max and Honor Magic 8 Pro Air
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
Max clock 4600 MHz 4210 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
- 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro
- 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium
- 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra
L3 cache 12 MB 16 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon MediaTek NPU 990
GPU
Graphics Adreno 840 Mali-G1 Ultra MP12
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1716 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~5271.5 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi K90 Pro Max and Honor Magic 8 Pro Air
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 27658 24660
Single-core score 3687 3366
Multi-core score 11219 10603
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
4430255
CPU 1131610 1302546
GPU 1407372 1820346
Memory 516269 457631
UX 842570 849732
Total score 3897821 4430255
Samples [3 tests] [2 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 78% -
Graphics test 19 FPS -
Graphics score 2613 -
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 47 FPS -
Section 1 54 FPS -
Section 2 47 FPS -
Section 3 39 FPS -
Graphics score 12330 -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Graphics test 38 FPS -
Graphics score 6490 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 15760 -
Video editing 8107 -
Photo editing 35534 -
Data manipulation 18051 -
Writing score 23843 -
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (25th and 6th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi K90 Pro Max
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-03 (Xioami)GeekBench CPU3713 / 11324
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-03 (DARK)GeekBench CPU3760 / 11149
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-18 (Xiaomi User)GeekBench CPU3685 / 11205
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (WoW !!)GeekBench CPU3676 / 11184
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-12 (Kazuki)AnTuTu3699282
Honor Magic 8 Pro Air
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Miklos)AnTuTu3617298
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-02 (gaerly)AnTuTu4430255

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 -
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM HyperOS 3 MagicOS 10
OS updates - 7 years
Security updates - 7 years

Battery

Capacity 7560 mAh 5500 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 80 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable Yes No
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) Yes (50 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) -
Bypass charging Yes -
Fast charging Yes Yes

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 5x Optical, 3.2x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 102Β° 112Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 64 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.7 f/1.6
Focal length 23 mm 23 mm
Sensor Omnivision Light Hunter 950 -
Sensor size 1/1.31" (β‰ˆ 0.76 inch) 1/1.3" (β‰ˆ 0.77 inch)
Pixel size 1.2 micron 1.2 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 64 MP
Aperture f/3.0 f/2.6
Focal length 115 mm 74 mm
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/2" (β‰ˆ 0.5 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron -
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.2
Focal length 18 mm 16 mm
Sensor size 1/2.88" (β‰ˆ 0.35 inch) -
Pixel size 0.61 micron -
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution - 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 21 mm 21 mm
Sensor CMOS -
Sensor size 1/3.44" (β‰ˆ 0.29 inch) 1/2.93" (β‰ˆ 0.34 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.6 micron
Autofocus - Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes -
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers 2.1 Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos - No

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced October 2025 January 2026
Release date October 2025 January 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $560 -
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Face recognition sensor
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 100 W Yes, 80 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Xiaomi Redmi K90 Pro Max. It has a better battery life and sound.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
2 (25%)
6 (75%)
Total votes: 8

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!