Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 4G vs Vivo T4 5G
60
out of 100
VS
67
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.77-inch Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 4G (with MediaTek Helio G100 Ultra) that was released on December 18, 2025, against the Vivo T4 5G, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 and came out 8 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 4G
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
- Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 2048GB
- Stereo speakers
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- The phone is 8 months newer
- Weighs 15.3 grams less
Reasons to consider the Vivo T4 5G
- 80% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1043K versus 581K)
- Comes with 1300 mAh larger battery capacity: 7300 vs 6000 mAh
- Optical image stabilization
- Water-resistant body (IP65 classification)
- Supports higher wattage charging (55W versus 33W)
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
- Has 33% more RAM: 8GB versus 6GB
- The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.77 inches | 6.77 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels | 1080 x 2392 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 388 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 800 nits | 1300 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 3200 nits | 5000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10 | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 240 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Shield Glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.5% | 88.7% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99% | - |
| PWM | 119 Hz | - |
| Response time | 1 ms | - |
| Contrast | β Infinity | - |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 164.03 mm (6.46 inches) | 163.4 mm (6.43 inches) |
| Width | 75.42 mm (2.97 inches) | 76.4 mm (3.01 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.94 mm (0.31 inches) | 7.89 mm (0.31 inches) |
| Weight | 183.7 g (6.48 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP64 | IP65 |
| Rear material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green, Purple | Gray, Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | Average (2.63/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Excellent (A) Β· 270 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 |
| Max clock | 2200 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520) - 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720) - 1 core at 2.5 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720) |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Adreno 810 |
| GPU shading units | 64 | 256 |
| GPU clock | 1000 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~128 GFLOPS | ~537.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 1325 | 4470 |
| Single-core score | 697 | 1149 |
| Multi-core score | 1705 | 3190 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 200727 | 424135 |
| GPU | 44524 | 174238 |
| Memory | 161347 | 160587 |
| UX | 174636 | 284565 |
| Total score | 581234 | 1043525 |
| Samples | [5 tests] | [4 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Graphics test | - | 3 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 379 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 9801 |
| Video editing | - | 6277 |
| Photo editing | - | 22681 |
| Data manipulation | - | 9303 |
| Writing score | - | 14366 |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 4G
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-06-14 (Javier) | AnTuTu | 575630 |
| π 2026-05-31 (Aditya) | AnTuTu | 581234 |
| π 2026-05-02 -> BogdanMUIY | GeekBench CPU | 697 / 1705 |
| π 2026-05-02 -> BogdanMUIY | AnTuTu | 581234 |
| π 2026-05-02 (BogdanMUIY) | AnTuTu | 581234 |
Vivo T4 5G
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-06-05 (Mrinal) | AnTuTu | 1049495 |
| π 2026-01-21 (VISHAL..) | AnTuTu | 1024476 |
| π 2025-12-20 (Pardeep Singh) | AnTuTu | 1043525 |
| π 2025-12-19 (Pardeep) | AnTuTu | 1043525 |
Memory
| RAM size | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | No |
| Memory card max size | Up to 2048 GB | - |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 15 |
| ROM | HyperOS 3 | FuntouchOS 15 |
| OS size | 45 GB | - |
| OS updates | 3 years | - |
| Security updates | 6 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 6000 mAh | 7300 mAh |
| Max charge power | 33 W | 55 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Bypass charging | No | - |
| Fast charging | Yes (50% in 40 min) | Yes (60% in 45 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:30 hr | 1:15 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1000 cycles | - |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 108 MP 2) Depth: 2 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Depth: 2 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | - |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HM9 | Sony IMX882 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.67" (β 0.6 inch) | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 20 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV02F | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/5" (β 0.2 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.75 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Depends on the region | No |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | Yes | No |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | December 2025 | April 2025 |
| Release date | January 2026 | April 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $240 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 90 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo T4 5G is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 1
Related comparisons
1.
Vivo T4 5G vs Oppo K13 5G (4)