Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs Poco F7 Ultra
74
out of 100
VS
83
out of 100
Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.83-inch Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5) that was released on August 27, 2026, against the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and came out 1 year and 5 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
- Comes with 4700 mAh larger battery capacity: 10000 vs 5300 mAh
- Shows 89% longer battery life (49:44 vs 26:17 hours)
- Delivers 115% higher peak brightness (3443 against 1598 nits)
- The phone is 1 year and 5 months newer
- The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
- Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
- 3x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3060K versus 1007K)
- The rear camera has a 2.5x optical zoom
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Handles wireless charging up to 50W
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- 18% higher pixel density (526 vs 447 PPI)
- Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 100W)
- 2.5x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2753 and 1099 points
- Weighs 17.5 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.83 inches | 6.67 inches |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2772 pixels | 1440 x 3200 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 447 ppi | 526 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1060 nits | 1800 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 3500 nits | 3200 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 240 Hz | 480 Hz |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Poco Shield Glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.5% | 89.4% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | - | 99.3% |
| PWM | - | 120 Hz |
| Response time | - | 1 ms |
| Contrast | - | ∞ Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 163.4 mm (6.43 inches) | 160.26 mm (6.31 inches) |
| Width | 78.3 mm (3.08 inches) | 74.95 mm (2.95 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm (0.34 inches) | 8.39 mm (0.33 inches) |
| Weight | 229.5 g (8.1 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP68 |
| Advanced cooling | - | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | - | Glass |
| Frame material | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green, Purple | Black, Yellow |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | - | Average (2.61/5) |
| Drop resistance | - | Average (D) · 45 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Max clock | 2600 MHz | 4320 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 4 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M) - 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L) |
| L3 cache | - | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 812 | Adreno 830 |
| GPU shading units | 256 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | - | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | - | ~3379.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 4250 | 16908 |
| Single-core score | 1099 | 2753 |
| Multi-core score | 3481 | 8410 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 348694 | 876139 |
| GPU | 119297 | 1135602 |
| Memory | 267736 | 434324 |
| UX | 271413 | 614928 |
| Total score | 1007140 | 3060993 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [10 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 77% |
| Graphics test | - | 16 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 2190 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | - | 38 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 43 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 39 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 33 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 10116 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 22176 |
| Video editing | - | 8080 |
| Photo editing | - | 36202 |
| Data manipulation | - | 18123 |
| Writing score | - | 23212 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#103rd place)
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
No benchmark results yet
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-10-09 (RuxeLV) | Geekbench 7 GPU | 14153 |
| 📘 2026-10-09 (RuxeLV) | Geekbench 7 CPU | 2548 / 8876 |
| 📘 2026-10-09 (RuxeLV) | AnTuTu 12 | 3512055 |
| 📘 2026-10-06 (RuxeLV) | AnTuTu 11 | 3193869 |
| 📘 2026-09-28 (Yunon) | AnTuTu 12 | 3325373 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Channels | - | 4 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | HyperOS 3 | HyperOS 3.0 |
| OS size | - | 33 GB |
| OS updates | - | 4 years |
| Security updates | - | 6 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 10000 mAh | 5300 mAh |
| Max charge power | 100 W | 120 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (57% in 30 min) | Yes (60% in 15 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:01 hr | 0:30 hr |
| Battery cycles | - | 1000 cycles |
| Web browsing | 20:44 hr | 11:39 hr |
| Watching video | 33:14 hr | 14:46 hr |
| Gaming | 09:29 hr | 05:50 hr |
| Standby | 223 hr | 124 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (1st and 129th place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8160 x 6120 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 2.5x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | Up to 24FPS |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | - | 1920 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 120° | 120° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 32 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.6 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | OmniVision OVX8000 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/1.55" (≈ 0.65 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | - | 50 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | - | 60 mm |
| Sensor | - | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | - | Optical |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | - | Samsung S5KKD1 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) | 1/3.44" (≈ 0.29 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 6528 x 4896 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | - | 24 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | Samsung S5KKD1 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/3.42" (≈ 0.29 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.61 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Depends on the region | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | August 2026 | March 2025 |
| Release date | August 2026 | April 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | - | $649 |
| Successor | - | - Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 100 W | Not included |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 1