ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G vs Infinix GT 30 Pro
59
out of 100
VS
68
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.8-inch ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G (with Unisoc T9100) that was released on March 3, 2025, against the Infinix GT 30 Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate and came out 2 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Supports higher wattage charging (80W versus 45W)
- Comes with 800 mAh larger battery capacity: 6000 vs 5200 mAh
- Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Infinix GT 30 Pro
- Water-resistant body (IP64 classification)
- 2.4x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1740K versus 723K)
- Higher display refresh rate β 144 Hz
- Handles wireless charging up to 50W
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
- 14% higher pixel density (440 vs 386 PPI)
- The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
- Has a built-in infrared port
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.8 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels | 1224 x 2720 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | - | 20:9 |
| PPI | 386 ppi | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-144 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1300 nits | 1600 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | - | 4500 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | - | 240 Hz |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 0% | 89.5% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 167.5 mm (6.59 inches) | 163.7 mm (6.44 inches) |
| Width | 76.3 mm (3 inches) | 75.8 mm (2.98 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm (0.33 inches) | 8 mm (0.31 inches) |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | IP64 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | Gray, Yellow | White, Black |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | Good (3/5) | Good (3.67/5) |
| Drop resistance | Average (D) Β· 80 drops | Excellent (A) Β· 270 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc T9100 | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate |
| Max clock | 2700 MHz | 3350 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.1 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 3 cores at 2.3 GHz: Cortex-A76 - 1 core at 2.7 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
- 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 3 cores at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-A715 - 1 core at 3.35 GHz: Cortex-A715 |
| L3 cache | - | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | MediaTek APU 780 |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP4 | Mali-G615 MP6 |
| GPU shading units | 128 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 780 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~199.7 GFLOPS | ~2150.4 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 2645 | 9283 |
| Single-core score | 872 | 1469 |
| Multi-core score | 2451 | 4431 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 292879 | 512281 |
| GPU | 61687 | 433395 |
| Memory | 147055 | 363487 |
| UX | 222204 | 431794 |
| Total score | 723825 | 1740957 |
| Samples | [11 tests] | [78 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 97% | 81% |
| Graphics test | 2 FPS | 9 FPS |
| Graphics score | 233 | 1193 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | - | 18 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 20 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 18 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 16 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 4790 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 14936 | - |
| Video editing | 7599 | - |
| Photo editing | 32237 | - |
| Data manipulation | 9940 | - |
| Writing score | 15432 | - |
Recent User Tests
ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-13 (Vinnzzx67) | AnTuTu 12 | 821056 |
| π 2026-09-12 -> Chizu | AnTuTu 11 | 746898 |
| π 2026-06-22 (Firdausss) | AnTuTu 11 | 754254 |
| π 2026-05-04 -> Gil_lipata33 | AnTuTu 11 | 723825 |
| π 2026-05-04 (Zypher) | AnTuTu 11 | 723825 |
Infinix GT 30 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-28 (Hosh) | AnTuTu 12 | 1987817 |
| π 2026-09-23 (Amooarman) | AnTuTu 12 | 1904000 |
| π 2026-09-20 (Hosh) | AnTuTu 11 | 1909681 |
| π 2026-09-14 (Unknown) | AnTuTu 12 | 1907710 |
| π 2026-09-10 (Md. Faizan) | AnTuTu 12 | 1922094 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | - |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| ROM | - | XOS 15 |
| OS updates | 3 years | 2 years |
| Security updates | 3 years | 3 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 6000 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Max charge power | 80 W | 45 W |
| Battery type | - | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse charging | No | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | - | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes (50% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | - | 1:03 hr |
| Battery cycles | 800 cycles | 800 cycles |
| Web browsing | - | 08:11 hr |
| Watching video | - | 15:07 hr |
| Gaming | - | 06:04 hr |
| Standby | - | 104 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 108 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 12000 x 9000 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | - | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | - | 111Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Depth: 2 MP |
1) Standard: 108 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Sensor | - | Samsung ISOCELL HMX |
| Sensor size | - | 1/1.33" (β 0.75 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Image resolution | - | 8 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | - | GalaxyCore GC08A8 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 1 micron |
| Stabilization | - | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 16 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | - | GalaxyCore GC13A0 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/3.1" (β 0.32 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Depends on the region | Yes |
| Infrared port | No | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | No |
| FM radio | - | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | March 2025 | May 2025 |
| Release date | May 2025 | June 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $230 | $310 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 80 W | Yes, 45 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Infinix GT 30 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 65