ZTE Nubia Neo 3 5G vs Tecno Pova 7 4G

57 out of 100
ZTE Nubia Neo 3 5G
VS
59 out of 100
Tecno Pova 7 4G

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.8-inch ZTE Nubia Neo 3 5G (with Unisoc T8300) that was released on March 3, 2025, against the Tecno Pova 7 4G, which is powered by MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate and came out 3 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the ZTE Nubia Neo 3 5G
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
  • 11% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (639K versus 573K)
  • 21% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 880 and 727 points
Reasons to consider the Tecno Pova 7 4G
  • Water-resistant body (IP64 classification)
  • Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
  • Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 2048GB
  • Supports higher wattage charging (45W versus 33W)
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • Has a built-in infrared port

Review

Evaluation of ZTE Nubia Neo 3 5G and Tecno Pova 7 4G crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 128 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
110.1
(Excellent)
Value Index
239.5
(Excellent)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.8 inches 6.78 inches
Resolution 1080 x 2392 pixels 1080 x 2460 pixels
Aspect ratio - 21:9
PPI 386 ppi 396 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1000 nits -
HDR support No No
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 0% 83.1%
Display features - DCI-P3 - DCI-P3

Design and build

Height 167.5 mm (6.59 inches) 168.6 mm (6.64 inches)
Width 76.3 mm (3 inches) 76.6 mm (3.02 inches)
Thickness 8.4 mm (0.33 inches) 9.3 mm (0.37 inches)
Weight 209 g (7.37 oz) 203 g (7.16 oz)
Waterproof No IP64
Rear material Plastic Plastic
Frame material Plastic Plastic
Colors Black, Silver, Gold Black, Silver, Gray
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-button
Repairability Good (3/5) -
Drop resistance Average (D) Β· 80 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of ZTE Nubia Neo 3 5G and Tecno Pova 7 4G
SoC
Chipset Unisoc T8300 MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate
Max clock 2200 MHz 2200 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A78
- 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
GPU
Graphics Mali-G57 MP2 Mali-G57 MP2
GPU shading units 64 64
GPU clock 950 MHz 1000 MHz
FLOPS ~121.6 GFLOPS ~128 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of ZTE Nubia Neo 3 5G and Tecno Pova 7 4G
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
880
727
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
2073
2014
Compute Score (GPU)
1589
1478
Compute Score (GPU) 1589 1478
Single-core score 880 727
Multi-core score 2073 2014
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
639225
573915
CPU 264705 221558
GPU 41859 48472
Memory 131183 146250
UX 201478 157635
Total score 639225 573915
Samples Less than 3 [15 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Graphics test - 1 FPS
Graphics score - 145
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 10353
Video editing - 6319
Photo editing - 24389
Data manipulation - 6530
Writing score - 12196

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
ZTE Nubia Neo 3 5G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 (Thanachot Matarat)Battery lifeSOT 12:24 / 22:00
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 (Thanachot Matarat)AnTuTu 11630373
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-19 (just_arcturus)AnTuTu 11639225
Tecno Pova 7 4G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (Jereil Alvarado)AnTuTu 11582708
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 -> Hehehe_.AnTuTu 11573915
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-02 (Cale)AnTuTu 11587371
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-22 (ZanianZ)AnTuTu 11554531
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-26 (yes)AnTuTu 11557342

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory clock 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2
Memory card No MicroSD
Memory card max size - Up to 2048 GB

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 15
ROM - HIOS 15
OS updates 3 years -
Security updates 3 years -

Battery

Capacity 6000 mAh 7000 mAh
Max charge power 33 W 45 W
Battery type - Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No No
Fast charging Yes Yes
Battery cycles 800 cycles -

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 108 megapixels
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording No No
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 60FPS
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Depth: 2 MP
1) Standard: 108 MP
2) Depth: 2 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 108 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.7
Focal length - 23 mm
Pixel size - 0.7 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 16 megapixels 8 megapixels
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length - 26 mm
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.2
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
NFC* Depends on the region Yes
Infrared port No Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes No

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack Yes Yes
FM radio - Yes
Dolby Atmos No Yes

Other

Category Mid-range Budget
Announced March 2025 June 2025
Release date May 2025 June 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $240 $120
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 33 W Yes, 45 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the battery life, design, and sound are more important to you, then choose the Tecno Pova 7 4G. But if the performance, gaming, and software are more of a priority – go for the ZTE Nubia Neo 3 5G.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
52 (65.8%)
27 (34.2%)
Total votes: 79

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Nirrgga June 24, 2026 at 02:34 AM
The nubia Neo 3 4G actually has better specs than the 5G version in some areas. It uses a Mali-G57 MC4 GPU (4 cores) which handles gaming better than the 5G model's MC2 (2 cores). Plus, the 4G variant actually supports 4K video recording/playback, while the 5G version maxes out at 1080p and why didn't they put the nubia neo 3 4g in this site
0 Reply
Avatar
Rayzer March 2, 2026 at 04:39 PM
The Tecno Pova 7 4g has a bypass charging and reverse charging and idk why you put no in there but yeah
0 Reply