ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 12 Pro

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.8-inch ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3) that was released on November 23, 2023, against the Vivo iQOO 12 Pro, which is powered by the same chip. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9 Pro
  • Comes with 1400 mAh larger battery capacity: 6500 vs 5100 mAh
  • Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO 12 Pro
  • Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
  • The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
  • Has 2x more RAM: 16GB versus 8GB
  • 30% higher pixel density (518 vs 400 PPI)
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Handles wireless charging up to 50W
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 80W)
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • More recent OS version: Android 15 versus 14

Review

Evaluation of ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9 Pro and Vivo iQOO 12 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 256 GB
VS
16 / 256 GB
48.0
(Average)
Value Index
23.9
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.8 inches 6.78 inches
Resolution 1116 x 2480 pixels 1440 x 3200 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 400 ppi 518 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes
Max rated brightness 1600 nits 3000 nits
HDR support No Yes, HDR10+
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 5 Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 89.1% 89.4%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.5% -
PWM 60 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Peak brightness test (auto)
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 164 mm (6.46 inches) 164.63 mm (6.48 inches)
Width 76.4 mm (3.01 inches) 75.4 mm (2.97 inches)
Thickness 8.9 mm (0.35 inches) 8.58 mm (0.34 inches)
Weight 229 g (8.08 oz) 205 g (7.23 oz)
Waterproof No IP68
Advanced cooling Active fan Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass -
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Silver White, Black, Red
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9 Pro and Vivo iQOO 12 Pro
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Max clock 3300 MHz 3300 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2)
Architecture - 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache 12 MB 12 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 750 Adreno 750
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 903-1000 MHz 903-1000 MHz
FLOPS ~2774 GFLOPS ~2774 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9 Pro and Vivo iQOO 12 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 14905 -
Single-core score 2233 2280
Multi-core score 6869 7034
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
2433337
CPU 662661 728229
GPU 823958 796294
Memory 361209 409678
UX 561916 499136
Total score 2409744 2433337
Samples [5 tests] Less than 3
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 92% 80%
Graphics test 13 FPS 12 FPS
Graphics score 1727 1615
3DMark Solar Bay
Stability 99% 72%
Graphics test 33 FPS 31 FPS
Section 1 36 FPS 36 FPS
Section 2 33 FPS 31 FPS
Section 3 29 FPS 26 FPS
Graphics score 8666 8190
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Stability 90% 77%
Graphics test 30 FPS 27 FPS
Graphics score 5156 4525
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 20450 10146
Video editing 8590 6433
Photo editing 50380 31181
Data manipulation 14699 12232
Writing score 26447 19999
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (157th and 153rd place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-19 (mitchi)AnTuTu 112432142
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-08 (PsIx0pAt)AnTuTu 112320412
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-18 (Anonymous)AnTuTu 112408843
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-01 (Shuller)AnTuTu 112500131
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-06 (Vall)AnTuTu 112409744
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro
No benchmark results yet

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 16 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 4800 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 14 Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 15)
ROM Redmagic OS 9 Funtouch 15
OS size 25 GB -

Battery

Capacity 6500 mAh 5100 mAh
Max charge power 80 W 120 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No Yes (50 W)
Reverse charging No Yes
Fast charging Yes (84% in 30 min) Yes
Full charging time 0:42 hr -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 09:54 hr -
Watching video 21:54 hr -
Gaming 08:25 hr -
Standby 134 hr -
General battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8160 x 6120 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital Optical, 3x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 960 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 122Β° 119Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 50 MP
3) Macro: 2 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 64 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/1.7
Focal length - 23 mm
Sensor Samsung GN5 Omnivision OV50H
Sensor size 1/1.57" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch) 1/1.3" (β‰ˆ 0.77 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1.2 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution - 64 MP
Aperture - f/2.6
Focal length - 70 mm
Sensor - Omnivision OV64B
Sensor size - 1/2.0" (β‰ˆ 0.5 inch)
Pixel size - 0.7 micron
Stabilization - Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length - 15 mm
Sensor - Samsung S5KJN1
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital
Macro lens
Image resolution 2 MP -
Aperture f/2.4 -
Stabilization Digital -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Image resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.5
Sensor Omnivision OV16E1Q Samsung S5K3P9
Sensor size 1/2.8" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/3.1" (β‰ˆ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1 micron
Autofocus No -
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes, DP 1.2 -
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* 20 20
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack Yes No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No -
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced November 2023 November 2023
Release date November 2023 November 2023
Launch price (MSRP) $649 $810
Successor - ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro -
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 80 W Yes, 120 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the camera, battery life, and sound are more important to you, then choose the ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9 Pro. But if the display, software, and design are more of a priority – go for the Vivo iQOO 12 Pro.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
11 (14.3%)
66 (85.7%)
Total votes: 77

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!