Dimensity 9600M vs Kirin 9035

We compared the 8-core MediaTek Dimensity 9600M (Mali-G1 Ultra MP12) with the newer 9-core HiSilicon Kirin 9035 (Maleoon 935) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9600M
  • Shows significantly better (up to 2.2x) AnTuTu 11 score – 4011K vs 1811K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 5 nm)
  • 48% higher CPU clock speed (4210 vs 2850 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture
  • Supports 11% higher memory bandwidth (85.3 against 76.8 GB/s)
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 9035
  • Has 1 more cores

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
4011932
1811490
CPU 1043247 541759
GPU 1510982 508312
Memory 667254 453112
UX 790449 308307
Total score 4011932 1811490
Samples Less than 3 Less than 3

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
3302
1398
Multi-Core Score
10240
5510
Compute Score (GPU)
25801
8098

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 9600M and Kirin 9035

CPU

Architecture 1x 4.21 GHz – C1-Ultra
3x 3.5 GHz – C1-Premium
4x 2.7 GHz – C1-Pro
1x 2.85 GHz –
4x 2.27 GHz –
4x 1.72 GHz –
Cores 8 9
Frequency 4210 MHz 2850 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.3-A ARMv8-A
L1 cache 192 KB -
L2 cache 2 MB -
L3 cache 16 MB -
Process 3 nanometers 5 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 9 W -
Manufacturing TSMC SMIC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 Maleoon 935
Architecture Valhall 5th gen Maleoon
GPU frequency 1716 MHz -
Pipelines 12 6
Shading units 128 256
Total shaders 1536 1536
FLOPS 5271.5 Gigaflops -
Vulkan version 1.4 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 990 Da Vinci
NPU theoretical performance 100 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 5333 MHz 4800 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 85.3 Gb/s 76.8 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1
Max display resolution - 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP -
Video capture 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Balong 6000
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 10700 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 6.0 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced September 2026 October 2026
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number MT6994 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 9035 and Dimensity 9600M, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!