OnePlus Pad Go 2 vs Motorola Moto Pad (2026)
67
out of 100
VS
58
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 12.1-inch OnePlus Pad Go 2 (with MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra) that was released on December 17, 2025, against the Motorola Moto Pad (2026), which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 6300 and came out 3 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the OnePlus Pad Go 2
- 92% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1011K versus 527K)
- Delivers 113% higher peak brightness (835 against 392 nits)
- Has a 1.1 inches larger screen size
- Comes with 3010 mAh larger battery capacity: 10050 vs 7040 mAh
- Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- Supports higher wattage charging (33W versus 20W)
Reasons to consider the Motorola Moto Pad (2026)
- Water-resistant body (IP52 classification)
- Much smaller footprint: 18% more compact case (65.6 vs 79.5 square inches)
- Weighs 117 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 12.1 inches | 11 inches |
| Resolution | 1980 x 2800 pixels | 1600 x 2560 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 7:5 | 16:10 |
| PPI | 283 ppi | 274 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (30-120 Hz) | - |
| Max rated brightness | 600 nits | 500 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 900 nits | - |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | - |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.1% | 82.9% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | - | 97.3% |
| PWM | - | Not detected |
| Response time | - | 28 ms |
| Contrast | - | 918:1 |
Screen space comparison
Pad Go 2
12.1″ (7:5 ratio) = 69.2 in2
Moto Pad (2026)
11″ (16:10 ratio) = 54.4 in2
~27% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 266.01 mm (10.47 inches) | 254.6 mm (10.02 inches) |
| Width | 192.77 mm (7.59 inches) | 166.2 mm (6.54 inches) |
| Thickness | 6.83 mm (0.27 inches) | 7 mm (0.28 inches) |
| Weight | 597 g (21.06 oz) | 480 g (16.93 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | IP52 |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Silver, Purple | Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 513 cm2 (79.5 inches2) | 423 cm2 (65.5 inches2) |
| Repairability | Good (3.49/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Bad (E) · 10 drops | - |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (77th and 100th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (58th and 75th place)
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 |
| Max clock | 2500 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 4 cores at 2.5 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
- 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek APU 655 | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G615 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
| GPU shading units | 256 | 64 |
| GPU clock | 1047 MHz | 1072 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~536.1 GFLOPS | ~137.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 2561 | - |
| Single-core score | 1003 | 762 |
| Multi-core score | 3112 | 1981 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 348327 | 224047 |
| GPU | 129975 | 46184 |
| Memory | 216404 | 102991 |
| UX | 316570 | 154049 |
| Total score | 1011282 | 527271 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | Less than 3 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 9698 | - |
| Video editing | 5011 | - |
| Photo editing | 19645 | - |
| Data manipulation | 8103 | - |
| Writing score | 13352 | - |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 1024 GB | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| ROM | OxygenOS 16 | - |
| OS size | - | 28 GB |
| OS updates | 5 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 10050 mAh | 7040 mAh |
| Max charge power | 33 W | 20 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | - |
| Bypass charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (33% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full charging time | 1:50 hr | - |
| Battery cycles | 800 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | 11:12 hr | - |
| Watching video | 13:48 hr | - |
| Gaming | 07:33 hr | - |
| Standby | 215 hr | - |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | - |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | - |
| Sensor | CMOS | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | - |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | December 2025 | April 2026 |
| Release date | December 2025 | April 2026 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | $280 |
| Sensors | - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
- Proximity sensor - Accelerometer - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | - |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the OnePlus Pad Go 2 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1